What's new

Evidence: Gas attack work of U.S. allies. Rebels had Sarin and used it

Awesome

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
22,023
Reaction score
5
Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies

Video in link

NEW YORK – As the U.S. considers a response to what it calls a chemical weapon attack by Syria’s Bashar al-Assad regime that killed hundreds of civilians, reliable Middle Eastern sources say they have evidence the culprits actually were the rebel forces trying to take over the government.

Secretary of State John Kerry accused the Assad government Monday of covering up the use of chemical weapons in “a cowardly crime” and a “moral obscenity” that shocked the world’s conscience. Kerry claimed the Obama administration had “undeniable” evidence “that the Assad government was culpable in the use of chemical weapons on civilians” in the Aug. 21 attack in Damascus suburbs.

Reports that the Obama administration is considering a military strike against the Assad government continued to circulate Monday. Meanwhile, U.N. weapon inspectors in Syria were fired upon by snipers as they attempted to investigate the site of the Aug. 21 attack.

Assad has rejected charges that his government forces used chemical weapons as “preposterous” and “completely politicized,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

He argues Syrian forces were in the targeted area.

“How is it possible that any country would use chemical weapons, or any weapons of mass destruction, in an area where its own forces are located?” Assad asked in the interview with Izvestia, according to a translation provided by Syria’s official news agency and published by the Los Angeles Times.

“This is preposterous! These accusations are completely politicized and come on the back of the advances made by the Syrian Army against the terrorists.”

Rebel attack?

With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last week’s attack.

A video posted on YouTube, embedded below, shows Free Syrian Army, or FSA, rebel forces launching a Sarin gas attack on a Syrian village.

Another video posted on YouTube shows what appears to be Syrian rebel forces loading a canister of nerve gas on a rocket to fire presumably at civilians and possibly government forces.

As seen below, a screen capture from the video shows rebel civilian forces placing a suspicious blue canister on top of a rocket-launching device.

A separate YouTube video from Syrian television shows a government-captured arsenal of what appears to be nerve gas weapons seized from a rebel stronghold in Jobar, Syria.

This is a hard sell for the United States to anyone other than the usual blind fools that follow the white house administrations edicts on wars like divine revelation.

For me, it is all too reminiscent of Iraq. Where the US went bumbling over itself in order to quickly launch an attack without proof or world buy in. Here again the UN has not concluded its findings. The UN was pulled out due to security concerns because someone mysteriously kept firing on them while the Syrians are insisting on an investigation.

Ridiculous that in a warzone, with Taliban (FSA) as the US allies, the doubt on who used the chemical Weapons (and which chemical weapon btw, has not even been established, what qualifies as a chemical weapon?), the first doubt is on the guy who actually got his army hit by the same attack?

I call shenanigans.
 
Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies

Video in link



This is a hard sell for the United States to anyone other than the usual blind fools that follow the white house administrations edicts on wars like divine revelation.

For me, it is all too reminiscent of Iraq. Where the US went bumbling over itself in order to quickly launch an attack without proof or world buy in. Here again the UN has not concluded its findings. The UN was pulled out due to security concerns because someone mysteriously kept firing on them while the Syrians are insisting on an investigation.

Ridiculous that in a warzone, with Taliban (FSA) as the US allies, the doubt on who used the chemical Weapons (and which chemical weapon btw, has not even been established, what qualifies as a chemical weapon?), the first doubt is on the guy who actually got his army hit by the same attack?

I call shenanigans.

so what do u guys think of the link posted abuve by Awesome? :unsure:

Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies

@Aeronaut @Armstrong BB @Hyperion @KingMamba93 @ZYXW @Talon @Alpha1 @p(-)0ENiX @Dillinger @Secur
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
The evidence in the WND.com article can all be true, yet it seems to be applied to build a lie. The evidence is of the rebels capturing and possessing strange weapons. There is no evidence presented of casualties specifically from a rebel attack.

In the current situation under consideration, however, a chemical attack was made an hour or two before a Syrian government advance into the attacked area. I can't conceive that Syrian government troops would have advanced if they thought the rebels had launched the attack rather than their own forces. The electronic and human intelligence blaming Asad seems like an afterthought by comparison.
 
Don't interfere in affairs that don't concern you unless you really have to & instead focus all of your energies inwards in improving your own country ! :)

FSA consists of Taliban. If one of them returns with these chemical weapons and uses them on densely populated Pakistani areas... Are you a gambling man, you like these odds?

Who do you think started the destruction of Holy sites in Syria? Who has a history of doing so?

How much you want to bet, the US won't limit its strikes on Cruise Missiles but F-18s will come into play?

How much you willing to bet, a few more holy sites would be targeted with US blessings to exacerbate the situation further and spread it to other regions including Pakistan.

America now has figured it all out. Play both Shia and Sunni sides and Pakistan is where a large Shia community lives with a larger Sunni community.
 
WND, toilet "news' outlet, doesn't have any evidence, evidently..
 
America now has figured it all out. Play both Shia and Sunni sides and Pakistan is where a large Shia community lives with a larger Sunni community.
Mr. "Lead with my Behind" doesn't think that way; he lets others think, then tags along. That's bad, but I doubt O is the ultimate culprit here.
 
FSA consists of Taliban. If one of them returns with these chemical weapons and uses them on densely populated Pakistani areas... Are you a gambling man, you like these odds?

Who do you think started the destruction of Holy sites in Syria? Who has a history of doing so?

How much you want to bet, the US won't limit its strikes on Cruise Missiles but F-18s will come into play?

How much you willing to bet, a few more holy sites would be targeted with US blessings to exacerbate the situation further and spread it to other regions including Pakistan.

America now has figured it all out. Play both Shia and Sunni sides and Pakistan is where a large Shia community lives with a larger Sunni community.

The Arabs & the Iranians have been doing that for the better part of a few decades - The trick is to work on 'internal stability' !

As for the Taliban being in possession of Chemical Weapons - There is nothing to suggest that ! Not even the extensive Al-Qaeeda network with their tens of millions of dollars, expertise & reach (blackmarket etc.) have been able to introduce Chemical Weapons to the battlefield !

Non-Interventionism doesn't mean wearing Blinders ! Be mindful of the situation but from the periphery & if it figures into our calculus that the AQ has Chemical Weapons in their possession or would soon have them...then deal with it in the best possible way !

Till that time...try to shelter ourselves away from this as best as we can - a little Non-Interventionism in the '80s in Afghanistan & then during the Musharaf Era & we wouldn't be seeing the mess we find ourselves in !
 
Agreed.... and about @Armstrong, he is kidding...... I'm sure of it...... him and his jeffersonian non intervention.... my arse..... put a ban on Nihari tomorrow , and he'll enlist to be the first suicide bomber..... :D

To capture ButtStrong's attention, the terrorists have to starve him first..... :devil:

FSA consists of Taliban. If one of them returns with these chemical weapons and uses them on densely populated Pakistani areas... Are you a gambling man, you like these odds?

Who do you think started the destruction of Holy sites in Syria? Who has a history of doing so?

How much you want to bet, the US won't limit its strikes on Cruise Missiles but F-18s will come into play?

How much you willing to bet, a few more holy sites would be targeted with US blessings to exacerbate the situation further and spread it to other regions including Pakistan.

America now has figured it all out. Play both Shia and Sunni sides and Pakistan is where a large Shia community lives with a larger Sunni community.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agreed.... and about @Armstrong, he is kidding...... I'm sure of it...... him and his jeffersonian non intervention.... my arse..... put a ban on Nihari tomorrow , and he'll enlist to be the first suicide bomber..... :D

To capture ButtStrong's attention, the terrorists have to starve him first..... :devil:

No Khan Sahib I meant what I said ! :undecided:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To awesome U must b an iranian or indian false flagger F$A = TALIBAN ur saying u shud b ashamed of urself the mujahideens of afghanistan r killing american nd nato troops daily for the past 11 years in afghanistan nd their puppets northern alliance drug lords iranian nd indian agents who hve sold afghanistan 2 america nd who r callabarating with america nd killing afghans just like F$A is killing syrians for america nd israel so u shud better write F$A= NORTHERN ALLIANCE DRUG LORDS instead of taliban or the mujahideens of afghanistan shame on u iranian nd indian agent.
 
Back
Top Bottom