What's new

GIDS KLASS 786 Rifles in service within the army

Falcon34

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 9, 2022
Messages
366
Reaction score
-2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Screenshot_20230727-183858_1.jpg

@PanzerKiel @Signalian
 
bro they cant make a car or motorbike or even a decent light bulb.
Bro wrong...they built the AWACS that saab said was beyond repair after the taliban all but destroyed it. Its not the talent but the asswipe generals who are metric pass and likes of showbaaz shareef
 
Last edited:
You can make aircraft, Tanks, drones, satellites, submarimes but you cannot make an assault rifle...don't u think that's fishy?
No, because all those are different systems with different requirements for different situations.

A rocket engineer may not know how to fix his own car. A dentist probably doesn't know how to do heart surgery. A piano player may not be able to play the drums....etc.
 
I was watching a video today how Columbian cartels in South America are hiring engineers from Pakistan to manufacture submersibles/submarines there and transport drugs to USA. There are numerous others examples of our people being ingenious, fixing Saab AWACS for example.

If there's a will to develop a good infantry rifle, there's no reason that we can't make it.
 
I was watching a video today how Columbian cartels in South America are hiring engineers from Pakistan to manufacture submersibles/submarines there and transport drugs to USA. There are numerous others examples of our people being ingenious, fixing Saab AWACS for example.

If there's a will to develop a good infantry rifle, there's no reason that we can't make it.
Problem is that we don't find organic R&D, especially for the sake of learning about the tech. E.g., we won't have a serviceable rocket motor for a good AAM or SAM for years, but if we stick with the R&D we'll get there.

In general Pak military doesn't respect the R&D process. E.g., they're still clueless about what India gained with Tejas (i.e. flight control tech, composites, avionics, design and testing, etc), yet fixate on its timelines.

If we had pursued Sabre II on our own, even as an F-7 variant, we too would hit delays and tech issues. Yet we could've learned a lot about aircraft design, integration, building aerostructures and so on. It might never even enter service, but we would've gained much, much more IMO from an R&D PoV versus JF-17.

Imagine how much toxic culture and lack of vision cost us re: our ballistic missiles. IIRC we had a true indigenous project back in the 1980s, and, expectedly, it struggled hard...yet unlike India, we never stuck to it, and we let generals misdirect R&D attention.


@JamD @SQ8 @Falcon26

@JamD
 
Problem is that we don't find organic R&D, especially for the sake of learning about the tech. E.g., we won't have a serviceable rocket motor for a good AAM or SAM for years, but if we stick with the R&D we'll get there. In general Pak military doesn't respect the R&D process. E.g., they're still clueless about what India gained with Tejas (i.e. flight control tech, composites, avionics, design and testing, etc), yet fixate on its timelines.
India has been learning since the 50s but they are still one of the biggest importers of weapons in the world. They can hardly stand up a squadron of Tejas or a regiment of Arjun. Don’t reinvent the wheel, if you can buy it.
 
@PanzerKiel Sir are these clips of trials which are included in this documentary on Sniper School or they are being inducted.
 

Back
Top Bottom