What's new

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011!

I wonder if there are Indian lurkers about who are embarassed that everytime statistics describing national indicators are released and India always lags somewhere near the bottom, the more screechy and vocal Indian posters are still brazen enough to disparage the accomplishments of their perceived enemies who are actually leaving India in the dust. It's like the concept of shame is completely lost on Indians. Stop living vicariously through other countries successes and failures, at least then your inferiority complex won't be so transparent.
 
In the event of a war in which the Mainland, Taiwan, HK, Macau or any of the Chinese Territories are affected, there will be mulitiple barrels all aiming at the enemy.:china:

If you say so...:D

Again most of these exports in electronic and machinery are foreign funded enterprises, they counted as Chinese exports but in fact it is the foreign firms are making a killing of Chinese labor to enhanced their own profit, anything even the finished product of multinational firms are Chinese exports as long as they are made in China. The statistic is the same statistic the USA use to launch a trade war against China, even though it is absurd.

Dude, common sense isn't allowed in these threads. :cool:
We all know washing machines are super hi-tech.
 
Lol greater China patents...they point missiles at each other and express love when comes to counting patents :kiss3:
 
Lol greater China patents...they point missiles at each other and express love when comes to counting patents :kiss3:

Thats high IQ stuff... we lesser mortals won't understand...

#as a workaround we can take it as... whatever floats their boat.
 
Patent application alone do not translate to escaping any income trap. If that is the case Taiwan should have been a high income economy long ago, it is not. There's plenty of other economic factors that will determine a countries wealth. To be perfectly honest, China will not have escaped the middle income trap by 2035, or 2050, but it is still possible for a country like Taiwan to do so riding on the back of China's economic growth. Unless there is some massive revolution and innovation in technologies especially ones that will reduce our dependence on fossil fuels completely, China will never escape the middle income trap. Can you imagine 2 billion Chinese and Indians owning 2 cars each, sorry not going to happen ever without a massive technological leap, commercial patents alone won't do it. Besides that point you don't really need to give much credence to such indicators, wealth is just a matter of perception, a better indicator would be those used by Bhutan to measure your gross national happiness, i.e do you have enough to eat, are you living a healthy sustainable life style, are you having a good emotional quality. If i am an optimist and a politician, I did rather have India or China's problem honestly than Japan's problem despite it being more complicated in multitude and the fact that both countries will never reach high income in the foreseeable future, so patents be damn, this thread is another one of those my **** is bigger than yours troll thread.

Good post. Development first and foremost is human development and looking at the quality of posts here in this site, both India and China have a long way to go. Filling the environment with Chemicals, radio-active waste and green-house gases is not development. Finding a sustainable course of economic development and working towards a more humane society with equitable wealth distribution are some good indicators.
 
All i see is little China beating Greater China by a whole lot. Something not exactly to be proud of and another reason why the Taiwanese shouldnt join the People's republic.

This is just US patents, not GLOBAL patents. There's no point in registering a patent in Taiwan. 99% of Taiwanese businessmen have US backgrounds anyhow. Therefore, the US patents granted to Taiwan are not a small fraction of total patents as it is for other countries; it's their total patent portfolio. There's only a point registering in the US if there's heavy business in the US. Otherwise, a WIPO patent is just as good, since the US is required to honor it by both US and international law. In WIPO patents, China at 3rd beats everyone except the US and Japan.

List of countries by patents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Again most of these exports in electronic and machinery are foreign funded enterprises, they counted as Chinese exports but in fact it is the foreign firms are making a killing of Chinese labor to enhanced their own profit, anything even the finished product of multinational firms are Chinese exports as long as they are made in China. The statistic is the same statistic the USA use to launch a trade war against China, even though it is absurd.

Not in machinery. Most of the machinery exports are state owned companies in shipbuilding, steel and power. Over 90% of value added from machinery exports goes to China as opposed to 40% from electronics.
 
Huawei has been granted at least 17,765 patents globally

In comparing international patent applications, all companies are being measured by the same standard. The assumption is that all major corporations will not file an application unless it passes in-house muster and meet a minimum criteria.

As of February 2011, Huawei "has been granted 17,765 [global patents] to date." (See Light Reading - Optical Networking - Huawei's Open Letter to the US - Telecom News Analysis). You cannot escape the fact that Huawei's 17,765 global patents exceed India's meager total of 7,198 U.S. patents in the last twenty-five years.

In conclusion, Huawei is twice the patent power of India.

----------

Story of a Chinese national champion: Huawei's incredible rise

The moral of the story is: if you throw a sufficient number of Chinese engineers at a problem then world industrial leadership is within your grasp.

CKDDv.jpg

Huawei has 15.7 percent market share in telecom equipment and is world #1 this year. The official announcement will come in April.

Reference: Reuters - Top gear: China's Huawei outmuscles Swedish rival

"Annual sales are forecast at around 200 billion yuan ($31.7 billion), around two-thirds of which, some $21 billion, are from telecoms gear, putting it ahead of Ericsson's 2011 network sales of $19.8 billion. Ericsson, which has a market value of more than $31 billion, has led the mobile telecom equipment market for at least the past decade."

Huawei - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History

YJKWl.jpg

Huawei Technology in Shenzhen, China

Early years

Huawei was founded by Ren Zhengfei in 1987, with an initial registered capital of RMB21,000.[13] Established in Shenzhen, Huawei started off as a sales agent for a Hong Kong company producing Private Branch Exchange (PBX) switches. By 1990, Huawei began its own independent research and commercialization of PBX technologies targeting hotels and small enterprises.[14] After accumulating knowledge and resources on PBX business, Huawei achieved its first breakthrough into the mainstream telecommunications market in 1992, when it launched its C&C08 digital telephone switch, which had the largest switching capacity in China at the time. By initially deploying in small cities and rural areas, the company gradually gained market share and made its way into the mainstream market.[15]

In 1994, Huawei established a long distance transmission equipment business, and launched its own SONET integrated access network, combining broadband and narrowband services in a single platform, and SDH product line. Huawei generated sales of RMB1.5 billion in 1995, mainly derived from rural markets in China.[14]

International expansion


In 1997, Huawei won its first overseas contract,[16] providing fixed-line network products to Hong Kong company Hutchison Whampoa.[15] Later that year, Huawei launched its wireless GSM-based products and eventually expanded to offer CDMA and UMTS. In 1999, the company opened a research and development (R&D) center in Bangalore, India to develop a wide range of telecom software.[14] From 1998 to 2003, Huawei contracted with IBM for management consulting, and underwent significant transformation of its management and product development structure. After 2000, Huawei increased its speed of expansion into overseas markets, having achieved international sales of more than US$100 million by 2000[16] and establishing an R&D center in Stockholm, Sweden. In 2001, Huawei established four R&D centers in the United States, divested non-core subsidiary Avansys to Emerson for US$750 million and joined the International Telecommunications Union (ITU). By 2002, Huawei’s international market sales had reached US$552 million.[14]

In 2004 Huawei continued its overseas expansion with a contract to build a third-generation network for Telfort, the Dutch mobile operator.[14] This contract, valued at more than $US25 million, was the first such contract for the company in Europe.[17]

In 2005, Huawei’s international contract orders exceeded its domestic sales for the first time. Huawei signed a Global Framework Agreement with Vodafone. This agreement marked the first time a telecommunications equipment supplier from China had received Approved Supplier status from Vodafone Global Supply Chain. The agreement established the terms and conditions for the supply of Huawei's solutions to any one of the Vodafone operating companies worldwide.[18] Huawei also signed a contract with British Telecom (BT) for the deployment of its multi-service access network (MSAN) and Transmission equipment for BT's 21Century Network (21CN), providing BT and the UK telecommunications industry with infrastructure necessary to support future growth.[19]

In May 2008, Huawei and Optus developed a mobile innovation centre in Sydney, Australia, providing facilities for engineers to develop new wireless and mobile broadband concepts into "ready for market" products.[20] In 2008, the company embarked on its first large scale commercial deployment of UMTS/ HSPA in North America providing TELUS's new next generation wireless network and Bell Canada with high-speed mobile access.[21]

Huawei delivered one of the world’s first LTE/EPC commercial networks for TeliaSonera in Oslo, Norway in 2009. The company launched the world's first end-to-end 100G solution from routers to transmission system that same year, to help meet the rapid growth of network traffic and enhance router efficiency and reliability.[14]

In July 2010, Huawei was included in the Global Fortune 500 2010 list published by the U.S. magazine Fortune for the first time, on the strength of annual sales of US$21.8 billion and net profit of US$2.67 billion.[22] In late 2010 it was reported that Huawei is planning to invest around US$500 million (Rs 2,200 crore) to set up a telecom equipment manufacturing facility in Tamil Nadu, India and $US100 million to expand its R&D center in Bangalore.[23][24]

Investment and partnerships

Huawei has focused on expanding its mobile technology and networking solutions through a number of partnerships. In March 2003, Huawei and 3Com Corporation formed a joint venture company, 3Com-Huawei (H3C), which focused on the R&D, production and sales of data networking products. The company later divested a 49% stake in H3C for US$880 million in 2006. In 2005, Huawei began a joint venture with Siemens, called TD Tech, for developing 3G/ TD-SCDMA mobile communication technology products. The US$100 million investment gave the company a 49% stake in the venture, while Siemens held a 51% stake.[14] In 2007, after Nokia and Siemens co-founded Nokia Siemens Networks, Siemens transferred all shares it held in TD Tech to Nokia Siemens Networks. At present, Nokia Siemens Networks and Huawei hold 51% and 49% shares of TD Tech respectively.[25]

In 2006, Huawei established a Shanghai-based joint R&D center with Motorola to develop UMTS technologies.[14] Later that year, Huawei also established a joint venture with Telecom Venezuela, called Industria Electronica Orinoquia, for research and development and sale of telecommunications terminals. Telecom Venezuela holds a 65% stake while Huawei holds the remaining 35% stake.[26]

Huawei and American security firm Symantec announced in May 2007 the formation of a joint-venture company to develop security and storage solutions to market to telecommunications carriers. Huawei owns 51% of the new company, named Huawei Symantec Inc. while Symantec owns the rest. The joint-venture is based in Chengdu.[27]

Grameenphone Ltd. and Huawei won the Green Mobile Award at the GSMA Mobile Awards 2009.[28] In March 2009, the Wimax Forum announced four new members to its Board of Directors including Thomas Lee, the Vice Director of the Industry Standards Department at Huawei.[29]

In 2008, Huawei launched a joint venture with UK-based marine engineering company, Global Marine Systems, to deliver undersea network equipment and related services.[30]

Recent performance

In April 2011, Huawei announced an earnings increase of 30% in 2010, driven by significant growth in overseas markets, with net profit rising to RMB23.76 billion (US$3.64 billion; £2.23 billion) from RMB18.27 billion in 2009.[31] In 2010 sales outside China continued to be the main driver of Huawei’s business. Overseas revenue rose 34% to RMB120.41 billion in 2010 from RMB90.02 billion in 2009, fueled by regions including North America and Russia. Revenues from China rose 9.7% to RMB64.77 billion, as the country's big telecom operators reduced their investment last year.[32]

Huawei's revenues in 2010 accounted for 15.7% of the $78.56 billion global carrier-network-infrastructure market, putting the company second behind the 19.6% share of Telefon AB L.M. Ericsson, according to market-research firm Gartner.[32]"
 
Patent application alone do not translate to escaping any income trap. If that is the case Taiwan should have been a high income economy long ago, it is not. There's plenty of other economic factors that will determine a countries wealth. To be perfectly honest, China will not have escaped the middle income trap by 2035, or 2050, but it is still possible for a country like Taiwan to do so riding on the back of China's economic growth. Unless there is some massive revolution and innovation in technologies especially ones that will reduce our dependence on fossil fuels completely, China will never escape the middle income trap. Can you imagine 2 billion Chinese and Indians owning 2 cars each, sorry not going to happen ever without a massive technological leap, commercial patents alone won't do it. Besides that point you don't really need to give much credence to such indicators, wealth is just a matter of perception, a better indicator would be those used by Bhutan to measure your gross national happiness, i.e do you have enough to eat, are you living a healthy sustainable life style, are you having a good emotional quality. If i am an optimist and a politician, I did rather have India or China's problem honestly than Japan's problem despite it being more complicated in multitude and the fact that both countries will never reach high income in the foreseeable future, so patents be damn, this thread is another one of those my **** is bigger than yours troll thread.

I disagree. I think China is already showing it is escaping the "middle income" trap by exporting commercial aircraft, cars, and becoming bigger than Exxon.

----------

China sells 40 ARJ-21-700 regional aircraft to Indonesia for $1.2 billion

GnnNz.jpg

Indonesia buys 40 ARJ-21-700 aircraft for $1.2 billion. Look below the windows at the front of the fuselage for the ARJ-21 logo.

??ARJ-21???????? ??????40?_????_???

"民航资源网2012年2月24日消息:印度尼西亚一名航空官员20日表示,印尼鸽航(Merpati Nusantara Airlines)将通过购买中国的ARJ21-700飞机来拓展其机队规模。印尼鸽航总裁萨尔佐诺(Sardjono Jhony Tjitrokusumo)表示,在印度尼西亚企业部长余世甘(Dahlan Iskan)的见证下,14日鸽航签署了购买40架ARJ21-700飞机的谅解备忘录。ARJ21-700支线客机可搭载100人,约单价3000万美元。目前,鸽航共运营有35架各类型飞机"

Translation:

"2012.02.24 Indonesian official indicated Merpati Nusantara Airlines had ordered China's new ARJ21-700 aircraft to expand their fleet size. Mr Sardjono Jhony Tjitrokusumo (CEO of Merpati Nusantara Airlines) had signed the agreement with China Aviation Import & Export Corporation to buy 40 ARJ21-700 regional aircraft.

ARJ21-700 aircraft can carry 100 passengers. The unit price is approximately $30 million."

[Note: Thank you to Mpleio for the newslink and translation.]

----------

In Latin America, Chinese cars are gaining buyers - latimes.com

"In Latin America, Chinese cars are gaining buyers
Chinese brands, with their low prices, are selling like hot cakes as Latin America's consumer class expands amid rising incomes.

GAsTC.jpg

Cars made by Chinese company JAC Motors are on display at a dealership in Rio de Janeiro. The low cost of Chinese cars is winning over buyers in Latin America. (Antonio Scorza / AFP/Getty Images / September 16, 2011)

By Adriana Leon and Chris Kraul, Los Angeles Times
February 9, 2012, 5:51 p.m.

Reporting from Lima, Peru, and Bogota, Colombia—

At first, Lima taxi driver Mario Segura was disgusted by the thought of buying a Chinese-made car. He had doubts about the vehicles' durability, service and resale value.

But favorable word of mouth, assurances that spare parts are plentiful and, of course, unbelievably low prices won him over.

"Little by little, I heard favorable comments," said Segura, speaking in a Chery showroom in the Surquillo district. He had just plunked down $12,000 in cash for a new Fullwin XR sedan, half the cost, he said, of a comparable Fiat or Renault. "It took a long time to decide, but I'm risking it."

So is Luis Luna, a doctor just back in Lima after working for several years in Argentina. He had planned on buying a secondhand Japanese car. Until, that is, he noticed billboards touting low-priced Chinese brands and listened as his relatives insisted that he kick tires at a JAC dealership, one of dozens of Chinese brands sold here.

"We realized for the same money that we'd pay for a crummy secondhand car that inspired no confidence, we could have a brand-new Chinese car with a two-year warranty," Luna said as he finished paperwork on his new $16,000 JAC B-Cross family wagon. "I'm totally convinced this is the right decision."

Similar buyer testimonials can be heard across Latin America these days, where Chinese cars with unfamiliar brand names like Great Wall, JAC, Brilliance and Sinotruk are selling like hot cakes. Chinese cars were introduced in Peru in 2006 and now one in six new cars sold here is a Chinese make.

There are no fewer than 90 Chinese car manufacturers to choose from, according to the trade group Automobile Assn. of Peru. The Chinese auto industry has yet to undergo the winnowing process that, over a century of competition, has reduced the U.S. car industry to three big players.

The Chinese brands' main selling point is, of course, price: New Chinese cars typically sell for half to two-thirds the cost of a comparable European, U.S. or Japanese vehicle, said Guido Vildozo, an auto industry expert with consultants IHS Automotive in Lexington, Mass.

"What makes Chinese cars so much cheaper? Start with labor," Vildozo said, noting that a typical Chinese autoworker makes $300 to $400 a month, a fraction of the $2,000 to $3,000 in wages that Mexican workers make or the $5,000 to $7,000 a month that U.S. auto workers average.

Another price advantage, said Jian Sun, a partner with AT Kearney business consultants in Shanghai, stems from the "reverse engineering," or design and mechanical imitation, that many Chinese carmakers use in competing models to save them the expense of designing new models from scratch.

Chinese manufacturers are entering the market as Latin American incomes are rising to unprecedented levels, flush from the decade-long global commodities boom filtering down to an expanding consumer class.

Augusto de la Torre, chief Latin America economist at the World Bank, said the region's middle class now encompasses 30% of its population of 570 million, up from 20% in 2002.

In Colombia, where the economy is thriving on global sales of its oil, coal, coffee and bananas, the increase in disposable income is especially dramatic. Bank of Bogota economist Camilo Perez said economic output per capita has nearly doubled in five years, to $6,700 last year from the $3,400 average in 2006.

So it comes as no surprise that car sales are accelerating. New units sold last year in Colombia totaled 325,000, a 28% increase from 2010. New car sales in Peru totaled more than 100,000 last year, up 26% from the previous year.

According to Scotiabank, Brazil's car sales will grow to 2.8 million in 2012, up 4% from last year, but in a much larger population base than those of its neighbors.

The expanding new-car market is what attracted Chinese automakers, who see Latin America as a proving ground for its plan to conquer the world car market in coming decades. According to AT Kearney, China exported 800,000 cars last year but hopes to boost that number to 2 million by 2015 and to 3 million by 2020.

The Latin focus is also explained, AT Kearney's Jian said, by the fact that Chinese manufacturers are not yet prepared to tackle the U.S. and European markets, which are more demanding in quality and emissions standards. The competition is less intense and the regulatory restrictions are lower in emerging markets, he said. China and these regions share similar road conditions, emission controls and safety standards.

(The domestic Chinese car market, where sales last year totaled about 18 million vehicles, is the largest in the world, far surpassing that of the U.S., where about 12.8 million new cars and trucks were sold in 2011.)

Many buyers, like Antonio Benevides, a 26-year-old theme park worker in Bogota, are first-time owners. In early December, he bought a new Chery QQ model for $9,000, two-thirds the cost of a comparable Renault he had considered.

"That difference in price is what put a new car within my reach for the first time," Benevides said as he drove his car off the dealership lot near Bogota's international airport. "I've heard they hold together well, that they are cheap to operate and, as you can see, they are not bad looking."

Special correspondents Leon reported from Lima and Kraul from Bogota."

----------

PetroChina surpasses Exxon in oil production - Boston.com

"Chinese firm surpasses Exxon in oil production
By Chris Kahn
AP Energy Writer / March 29, 2012

QHfxv.jpg

FILE - In this Thursday, Jan. 28, 2010 file photo, a worker walks past tanks at a Petrochina storage base in Suining, in southwest China's Sichuan province. A big shift is happening in Big Oil: an American giant now ranks second to a Chinese upstart. Exxon Mobil is pumping less oil than PetroChina, a company formed just 13 years ago by the Chinese government to better compete for the world's oil and natural gas. On March 29, 2012, the shift is expected to become official when the Beijing company announces that it produced more crude last year than its 130-year-old Texas rival. (AP Photo)

NEW YORK—A big shift is happening in Big Oil: An American giant now ranks behind a Chinese upstart.

Exxon Mobil is no longer the world's biggest publicly traded producer of oil. For the first time, that distinction belongs to a 13-year-old Chinese company called PetroChina.
The Beijing company was created by the Chinese government to secure more oil for that nation's booming economy.

PetroChina announced Thursday that it pumped 2.4 million barrels a day last year, surpassing Exxon by 100,000. The company has grown rapidly over the last decade by squeezing more from China's aging oil fields and outspending Western companies to acquire more petroleum reserves in places like Canada, Iraq and Qatar. It's motivated by a need to lock up as much oil as possible.

The company's output increased 3.3 percent in 2011 while Exxon's fell 5 percent. Exxon's oil production also fell behind Rosneft, the Russian energy company.

PetroChina's rise highlights a fundamental difference in how the largest petroleum companies plan to supply the world as new deposits become tougher to find and more expensive to produce.

Every major oil company has aggressively pursued new finds to replace their current wells. But analysts say Western oil firms like Exxon Mobil have been more conservative than the Chinese, mindful of their bottom line and investor returns. With oil prices up 19 percent in 2011, they still made money without increasing production.

PetroChina Co. Ltd. has a different mission. The Chinese government owns 86 percent of its stock and the nation uses nearly every drop of oil PetroChina pumps. Its appetite for gasoline and other petroleum products is projected to double between 2010 and 2035.

"There's a lot of anxiety in China about the energy question," says energy historian Dan Yergin. "It's just growing so fast."

While PetroChina sits atop other publicly traded companies in oil production, it falls well short of national oil companies like Saudi Aramco, which produces nearly 8 million barrels a day. And Exxon is still the biggest publicly traded energy company when counting combined output of oil and natural gas. PetroChina ranks third behind Exxon and BP in total output of oil and natural gas.

PetroChina is looking to build on its momentum in 2012.

"We must push ahead," PetroChina chairman Jiang Jiemin said in January.

PetroChina has grown by pumping everything it can from reserves in China, estimated to contain more than 6.5 billion barrels. It drilled thousands of oil wells across vast stretches of the nation's northern grasslands. Some of those fields are ancient by industry standards, dating close to the beginning of China's communist government in the 1950s.

The commitment to aging fields distinguishes PetroChina from its biggest Western rivals. Exxon and other major oil companies typically sell their aging, low-performing fields, or they put them out of commission.

PetroChina also has been on a buying spree, acquiring new reserves in Iraq, Australia, Africa, Qatar and Canada. Since 2010, its acquisitions have totaled $7 billion, about twice as much as Exxon, according to data provider Dealogic.

Several other Chinese companies have become deal makers around the globe as well. Total acquisitions by Chinese energy firms jumped from less than $2 billion between 2002 and 2003 to nearly $48 billion in 2009 and 2010, according to the International Energy Agency. More times than not, the companies are paying above the industry average to get those deals done.

It's making some in the West nervous.

In 2005, for example, CNOOC Ltd., a company mostly owned by the Chinese government tried to buy American oil producer Unocal. U.S. lawmakers worked to block the deal, asking President Bush to investigate the role the Chinese central government played in the process. Chevron Corp. eventually bought Unocal for $17.3 billion.

"There's a resistance to Chinese investment in (U.S.) oil and gas," Morningstar analyst Robert Bellinski says. "It's like how Japan was to us in the 1980s. People think they're going to take us over. They're going to buy all of our resources."

That's unlikely to happen. It doesn't make economic sense to export oil away from the world's largest oil consumer.

But the Chinese could make it tougher for Big Oil to generate returns for their shareholders. China's oil companies have been willing to outspend everyone and that drives up the price of fields and makes it more expensive for everyone to expand.

"You now have to outbid them," says Argus Research analyst Phil Weiss. "If you can't, you're going to have access to fewer assets."

Longer term, Chinese expansion globally will bring benefits to the U.S. and other economies. By developing as many oil wells as possible -- especially in Africa, Iraq and other politically unstable regions -- China will help expand supply.

"Frankly, the more risk-hungry producers there are, the more oil will be on the market, and the cheaper prices are," says Michael Levi, an energy policy expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Despite its swift expansion, PetroChina and other Chinese companies still have much to prove to investors, analysts say.

PetroChina's parent, China National Petroleum Corp., for example, has spent millions of dollars in Sudan to provide highways, medical facilities and shuttle buses for the elderly. Oil companies typically don't do that. All of that increases the cost of business and minimizes the returns for shareholders.

In 2009 and 2010, PetroChina's profit margins for its exploration and production business were only about two-thirds that of Exxon Mobil's. Its stock price has climbed less than 1 percent, in the past year, compared with a 3.7 percent rise in the stock of Exxon Mobil Corp.

"You have to ask yourself: What is the purpose of PetroChina?" Bellinski says. 'It is to fuel China. That's it. Although they're a public company, I'm very skeptical that they have any interest in shareholder value creation.'"
 
If you say so...:D



Dude, common sense isn't allowed in these threads. :cool:
We all know washing machines are super hi-tech.
and it is also the common sense that you are stupid and ignorant, becuase common senses are supported by hard figures, you dont have anything to prove your BS claim, but No4 global patent says it very well that China is gaining technological might to dominate world high-tech industries (already No1 in 2009)
like this one
Chinese To Build 4G Network For Japan » M.I.C. Gadget
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/132286-china-build-4g-network-japan.html

and I have been living in U.K for all of my 20s, and I saw how Chinese telecommunication companies taking over the capital goods market here...nowadays Vodafone, O2, 3G and BT are all using Chinese capital goods to maintain their technological competitiveness over their competitors
 
Chinese patents storm the world!

mDnR6.jpg

In 2008, China was the third-largest applicant for international patents at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). In 2008, China was fifth in the number of WIPO patents granted. In 2008, China was third in the world with 828,054 patents in force.

I will update this chart as more recent data becomes available.

Since Taiwan is not an internationally recognized country, it is excluded from the list.

Reference (see primary source from WIPO in footnote 2 of the article): List of countries by patents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia or http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/
 
I wonder if there are Indian lurkers about who are embarassed that everytime statistics describing national indicators are released and India always lags somewhere near the bottom, the more screechy and vocal Indian posters are still brazen enough to disparage the accomplishments of their perceived enemies who are actually leaving India in the dust. It's like the concept of shame is completely lost on Indians. Stop living vicariously through other countries successes and failures, at least then your inferiority complex won't be so transparent.

Funny you say that, cause thats exactly what the OP is trying to do, take credit for Taiwan's accomplishment by calling it Greater China.

When Chinese contribution to this "Greater China" figure is only about 30%.
 
Huawei has been granted at least 17,765 patents globally

In comparing international patent applications, all companies are being measured by the same standard. The assumption is that all major corporations will not file an application unless it passes in-house muster and meet a minimum criteria.

So many patents, yet not in the list of top 100 innovators.

In Asia, Japan dominates with 27% of the representation. As a testament to Japan’s solid innovation foundation, it has representative companies in 12 of the 16 industries. The only other Asian nation present is South Korea, with 4% of the companies. The lack of companies from China is noteworthy and underscores the fact that although China is leading the world in patent volume, quantity does not equate to influence and quality

c3pqs.png


http://img.en25.com/Web/ThomsonReutersScience/Top100.pdf
 
At Roybot, there are endless subjective articles denigrating China. Your references belong to that group.

My citations regarding Chinese patents are objective and fair.

Unlike your nonsense, I can point to real Huawei patents and products. Below, I have provided an example of Huawei/Chinese innovation. I can provide more examples if you continue to engage in anti-Chinese propaganda.

----------

Huawei Unveils Industry’s First Giga DSL Prototype

oYjzq.jpg
Huawei Smart AX M5300. The Smart AX MA5300 platform has been instrumental to Huawei's success in the global DSLAM (digital subscriber line access multiplexer) market, but the MA5600 series, designed to support more bandwidth-intensive services such as triple/quad play, is the company's flagship DSLAM.

http://www.vadvert.co.uk/technology/19503-huawei-unveils-industrys-first-giga-dsl-prototype.html

"Huawei Unveils Industry’s First Giga DSL Prototype
Mariah Lawson on 12 19, 2011

Can Achieve Access Rate of One Gbps per Twisted Pair

Shenzhen, China, Huawei, a leading global information and communications technology (ICT) provider, today announced that it successfully launched the industry’s first Giga DSL (Digital Subscriber line) prototype. The Giga DSL system employs time division duplex (TDD) to achieve a total upstream and downstream rate of 1,000 Mb/s over a single twisted pair.

In order to address obstacles related to limited bandwidth of FTTB (Fiber to the Building)/FTTC(Fiber to the Curb) and difficulty in deploying FTTH (Fiber to the Home) drop cables – so that users can enjoy bandwidth-hungry services such as IPTV and HDTV – optical fiber access points need to be located closer to users. While, 100 Mbp/s-plus ultra-broadband access can be made available relatively quickly by utilizing legacy copper line resources, providing 1,000 Mbp/s bandwidth within 100 meters of twisted pairs using DSL technology is more complex.

By using low-power spectral density in-signal transmission, Huawei’s Giga DSL prototype reduces radiation interference and power consumption, and provides a total upstream and downstream rate of one Gb/s within 100 meters, and 500 Mb/s-plus within 200 meters – making it a cost-effective option for telecom operators building ultra-broadband access networks.

Giga DSL is a next-generation access technology solution that's growing quickly. In 2011, ITU-T set up a G.fast project team dedicated to formulating new standards for ultra-speed access at short distances, the aim being to achieve 500 Mb/s access rate per twisted pair within 100 meters. Huawei has actively participated in the work of the team and has become a major technical contributor, having recently worked to incorporate TDD-OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) as a G.fast modulation mode.

Dr. Long Guozhu, Huawei’s Principal Expert of DSL technology, said, “Huawei has taken the lead in developing a Giga DSL prototype because of our rich capabilities and industry-leading technical strengths in access networks. It was inevitable that spectrum expansion would help us improve the rate of a twisted pair at a short distance, but after the spectrum is expanded, a technical issue appears: how to design the high-speed physical layer and high-frequency analog front end (AFE). To tackle this issue, Huawei’s FBB Innovation Lab used the core solution TDD-OFDM, which simplifies the physical-layer architecture and the AFE design, while at the same time makes it possible to be downward compatible with traditional ADSL/VDSL2 technologies.”

Huawei also recently announced the successful development of the world’s first node level vectoring (NLV) prototype. Huawei’s vectoring product provides 100 Mbps access over a single twisted pair in FTTC/FTTB, and has been tested and commercially trialed with many leading telecom operators. This, along with the company’s latest prototype, Giga DSL, signifies that DSL technology still has great potential to meet the requirements of broadband users for ultra-high-speed access in the future.

Huawei’s advances within Giga DSL will enhance the capabilities of the company’s SingleFAN broadband access solution. Its SingleFAN solution and related offerings are now servicing over one third of the world’s broadband users with ultra-broadband access services."

[Note: Picture source link: http://www.n9ws.com/users/damien/tutos/degroupage.htm. Caption source link: Huawei - SmartAX MA5300 (Product Advisor) - Market Research Reports - Research and Markets.]
 
At Roybot, there are endless subjective articles denigrating China. Your references belong to that group.

My citations regarding Chinese patents are objective and fair.

Unlike your nonsense, I can point to real Huawei patents and products. Below, I have provided an example of Huawei/Chinese innovation. I can provide more examples if you continue to engage in anti-Chinese propaganda.


I don't have any anti-China agenda here, its you lot who started by dragging India into this.

And Thomson Reuters is not really a non sense source.

It would be interesting to find out how many of the Chinese WIPO patents are actually from Taiwan. Since Taiwan is not recognized by WIPO lot of Taiwanese companies patent their products through China.

I wouldn't be surprised if out of the 3700 odd USPTO patents from China atleast 15-20% are from Taiwanese company like Foxconn.

veoqvo.png


Table I illustrates the strong concentration of USPTO patents in the hands of very few companies:the top 10 assignees account for over 85 percent of USPTO patents. Interestingly, three companies,Hongfujin (1), Fuzhun (3) and Futaihong (6), are subsidiaries of the Taiwanese-owned multinational Foxconn Technology Group, the world’s largest contract manufacturer in 3C (Computer, Communication, Consumer electronics) products.27These three subsidiaries account for over 40 percent of total USPTO patents in our matched dataset.
 
Funny you say that, cause thats exactly what the OP is trying to do, take credit for Taiwan's accomplishment by calling it Greater China.

When Chinese contribution to this "Greater China" figure is only about 30%.

That's US patents, not WIPO patents, which are much more important.

less than 10% of PRC patents are filed in the US (same for Japan). 99.999999% of Taiwanese patents are filed in the US. It's easy to understand why: There's no point in a Chinese business filing a patent specifically for the US when the biggest markets for innovative Chinese products are Europe, Southeast Asia and Africa, so they file WIPO patents. US businesses must obey WIPO patents anyways, by US law.

For Taiwan, they just file in the US, because there's a slight problem with them in WIPO: they are not a member state.

There's no point in comparing US patents. The US is just a country. Thomson Reuters is a private company. There's no difference between their opinion and that of African warlords.
 

Back
Top Bottom