What's new

HAL’s trainer aircraft headed for disaster as development costs soar

soumya1989

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
404
Reaction score
0
HAL’s trainer aircraft headed for disaster as development costs soar | idrw.org

The plan to build a Basic Trainer Aircraft (BTA) at home is headed for a nosedive as defence ministry has to take a crucial call on going ahead with the project because of high costs involved and a shaky delivery deadline promised by the aircraft maker Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

The IAF, which is in dire need of basic trainers for rookie pilots, had projected requirement for more than 180 of these aircraft to smoothly run its problem-ridden flying training programme.

The government gave the go-ahead to buy 75 BTAs from foreign vendor and the remaining was to be delivered by Bangalore-based HAL which attempted to make a new aircraft, named HTT-40.

The IAF ordered 75 Swiss Pilatus PC-7 trainers last year of which 14 have been delivered on a fast-track basis as they were required urgently.

These aircraft would be formally inducted into IAF on May 31 by junior defence minister Jitender Singh, paving the way for starting training from July onwards.

All 75 aircraft are expected to be delivered by 2015, as per the contract terms.

The delay

Even as the new aircraft started arriving, the HAL’s plan to build the basic trainer has not made much headway.

As per the project report submitted by the company in 2011, it had promised to deliver two aircraft by 2019 and 10 by 2021.

At this rate, the IAF can begin training on home-built BTAs only by 2022. The delay has already forced IAF to begin the process to exercise “option clause” with Pilatus to buy another 38 aircraft.

The Defence Acquisition Council had mandated IAF to exercise the clause to buy more aircraft from the foreign vendor only if HAL’s HTT-40 does not take off before the delivery of first Pilatus PC-7.

With first Pilatus arriving in February and HTT-40 nowhere in sight, the IAF will go for 38 more PC-7s. The defence ministry has also been made aware that HTT-40 is going to cost at least the double the amount charged by the Swiss company for PC-7.

A detailed cost analysis showed that a Pilatus PC-7 was purchased for Rs 30 crore per aircraft.

Whereas HAL’s own cost structure showed that at 2011 price for 106 aircraft, each HTT-40 will cost Rs 34.9 crore. If capital cost is added then the price tag goes up to Rs 37.95 crore.

By adding design and development cost along with per annum escalation, the final cost of HTT-40 comes to Rs 67.6 crore per aircraft, double the price of PC-7.

The HAL insists that unlike Pilatus PC-7, its BTA will have a multi-role capability as it could be armed for weapon training.

It raises a question if a multi-role capability was required at all in a basic trainer. The defence ministry will also have to grapple with the issue of duplicity of trainers, which will escalate infrastructure costs further.

It will also go into the aspect if HTT-40 is based on a Beechraft aircraft which had lost bid to Pilatus. The IAF has been managing its pilot training programme without a basic trainer for some years.
 
Well the new defence policy says that priority must be given to "Make Indian". Lets see if they actually implement this or just another failed Indian policy.
 
Well the new defence policy says that priority must be given to "Make Indian". Lets see if they actually implement this or just another failed Indian policy.

They know that it doesn't work yet, that's why they also added the other policies to at least licence produce foreign stuff in India.
 
Chinese have earmarked 16 billion just for an aircraft engine research - the F 35 costed hundreds of billions, so did the Eurofighter, Rafale etc. Aircraft research does not come cheap so if the intention is there to invent our own then we will have to bear the cost of it. Baniya behaviour will not bear fruit.
 
Chinese have earmarked 16 billion just for an aircraft engine research - the F 35 costed hundreds of billions, so did the Eurofighter, Rafale etc. Aircraft research does not come cheap so if the intention is there to invent our own then we will have to bear the cost of it. Baniya behaviour will not bear fruit.

Chinese are stupids (or atleast they have their hands tied . eh, they deserve it :laugh:) ...let them burn 16 billions. I hope they end up with 160 billion. :tup:

The cheapest defence doesn't come by re-inveting wheels... although, always buying abroad will also not be cheapest, either.

We must choose our battles carefully ... with the focus on winning the war, not individual battles.

It's a standard operational reserach / management problem: Buy or Make.

Getting the maximum bang for the buck.. comes with a judicious mix of "buy" and "make".
 
Well the new defence policy says that priority must be given to "Make Indian". Lets see if they actually implement this or just another failed Indian policy.

Why should we follow this policy if we end up paying more money for made in India products if we can buy cheaper licenses from elsewhere?
 
They know that it doesn't work yet, that's why they also added the other policies to at least licence produce foreign stuff in India.






Off course it won't work, If it work, General kids can't get prostitution tourism all over world. They won't get Audi and BMW. We all know how our generals and politicians are...


When first family of India is dalal, what can we expect from others???
 
we too be honest indian scientist used indian money like garbage arjun tank, HAL tejas are few projects there are many more where they put trillions of dollars in the junk yard
 
This is failed unauthorized project by HAL.They should instead concentrate all efforts on sitara intermediate jet trainer.
 
They know that it doesn't work yet, that's why they also added the other policies to at least licence produce foreign stuff in India.

When was the project initiation request for the trainers given to HAL? HAL shouldn't have even bothered with this project, the only reason why I think HAL even went here was due the prop engine HAL already produces.

HAL indeed should concentrate on that IJT that is stuck in a hangar for ages now. I am thoroughly disappointed! I wouldn't be surprised to see the Yak130 probing and prodding at IAF soon
 
Agreed about the cost.
But don't forget the solid base which will develop for future projects.
So it is good to make your own gadgets.
 
Agreed about the cost.
But don't forget the solid base which will develop for future projects.
So it is good to make your own gadgets.
 

Back
Top Bottom