What's new

I Am Malala by Malala Yousafzai – review

Ganymede

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
In Arabic, "revolution" is a feminine noun. This is fitting, as without women revolutions are sterile. They have no movement, no life, no sound. Urdu, a distorter of tongues, pilfering as it does from Persian, Hindi, but largely Arabic, uses the masculine word for coup d'etat – inqilab – for revolution, rather than the accurate feminine: thawra. Perhaps that's why the Taliban were confused. Perhaps that's why they imagined that shooting a 15-year-old girl would somehow enhance their revolution.

I Am Malala, Malala Yousafzai's fearless memoir, co-written with journalist Christina Lamb, begins on Malala's drive home from school on the day she was shot in the head. "Who is Malala?" the young gunman who stopped the Khushal school van asked. None of the girls answered. But everyone in the valley knew who Malala was. Ten years old when the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan came to the beautiful Swat Valley, once the home of ancient Buddhist kings, 11 years old by the time she had established herself as an international advocate for girls' education in Pakistan, Malala was targeted by the Taliban for "spreading secularism".

Ghostwritten books pose a constant difficulty – you are never sure whose voice is leading whose. Malala's voice has the purity, but also the rigidity, of the principled. Whether she is being a competitive teenager and keeping track of who she beat in exams (and by how much) or writing about the blog for the BBC that catapulted her on to the international stage – "We were learning how to struggle. And we were learning how powerful we are when we speak" – or talking about Pakistan's politicians ("useless"), Malala is passionate and intense. Her faith and her duty to the cause of girls' education is unquestionable, her adoration for her father – her role model and comrade in arms – is moving and her pain at the violence carried out in the name of Islam palpable.


It's hardly an exact science, guessing when the ghostwriter's voice takes over from the author's, but in the description, for example, of the scale of Pakistan's devastating 2005 earthquake, the reader is told that the damage "affected 30,000 square kilometres, an area as big as the American state of Connecticut", and the stiff, know-it-all voice of a foreign correspondent resounds.


It is Malala who touches the heart of Pakistan's troubles. Speaking of Swat, she writes that it was some 20 years after partition that the Wali of the Valley renounced his power and brought his kingdom into Pakistan. "So I was born a proud daughter of Pakistan," she writes, "though like all Swatis I thought of myself first as a Swati and Pashtun, before Pakistani."

What it means to be from Pakistan – a country of 300 languages, diverse cultures, religions and identities – when real power is restricted to one province is a debate that has always raged in this country. The army and bureaucracy and indeed the functioning power are centralised in the Punjab, while the remaining three provinces – Sindh, Balochistan and Khyber Pukhtun Khwa – are unequal shareholders in the idea that is Pakistan.

Until power is fairly shared among the four provinces the threat of secession will be a cloud hanging over the country. Malala writes of her beloved father, Ziauddin, wearing a black armband on Pakistan's 50th anniversary "because there was nothing to celebrate since Swat joined Pakistan", presciently foreshadowing a deepening ethnic imbalance so profound that only an extraordinary common enemy could distract from it. The burgeoning power of the Taliban in today's Pakistan should not be much of a surprise to those who understand, as Malala does, the need to redress these ethnic wounds.

Though feted around the globe for her eloquence, intelligence and bravery, Malala is much maligned in Pakistan. The haters and conspiracy theorists would do well to read this book. Malala is certainly an ardent critic of the Taliban, but she also speaks passionately against America's drone warfare, the CIA's policy of funding jihadi movements, the violence and abductions carried out by the Pakistani military, feudalism, the barbarous Hudood laws, and even Raymond Davis, the CIA contractor who caused a diplomatic meltdown between America and Pakistan when he killed two Pakistanis in broad daylight in Lahore – "Even we schoolchildren know that ordinary diplomats don't drive around in unmarked cars carrying Glock pistols."

I Am Malala is as much Malala's father's story as it is his daughter's, and is a touching tribute to his quest to be educated and to build a model school. Malala writes of her father sitting late into the night, cooking and bagging popcorn to sell so that he would have extra income for his project. She quotes him on all matters – from the ban on The Satanic Verses to the environmental problems facing the Swat Valley – and teases him for his long-winded speeches.

Yet, even as Malala says she does not hate the man who shot her, here in Pakistan anger towards this ambitious young campaigner is as strong as ever. Amid the bile, there is a genuine concern that this extraordinary girl's courageous and articulate message will be colonised by one power or other for its own insidious agendas. She is young and the forces around her are strong and often sinister when it comes to their designs on the global south. There is a reason we know Malala's story but not that of Noor Aziz, eight years old when killed by a drone strike in Pakistan; Zayda Ali Mohammed Nasser, dead at seven from a drone strike in Yemen; or Abeer Qassim Hamza al Janabi, the 14-year-old girl raped and set on fire by US troops in Mahmudiyah, Iraq. "I wasn't thinking these people were humans," one of the soldiers involved, Steven Green, said of his Iraqi victims.

It will always be more convenient for the west to paint itself as more righteous, more civilised, than the people they occupy and kill. But now, Malala's fight should be ours too – more inclusion of women, remembrance of the many voiceless and unsung Malalas, and education for all.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/oct/30/malala-yousafzai-fatima-bhutto-review
 
Its surprising that nobody gets any recognition until they endorse the western sponsored image of Islam and Pakistan and when people speak against it they are branded as so and so. Again hypocritical principles which are applied to a single side.
 
Last edited:
x4816_11471015.jpg.pagespeed.ic.27kluAI1xo.jpg
 
Its surprising that nobody gets any recognition until they endorse the western sponsored image of Islam and Pakistan and when people speak against it they are branded as so and so. Again hypocritical principles which are applied to a single side.
Problem is Amna what we see , we believe that. Violent minorities should be stopped at any cost. There should not be any strategic assets. Then only people can believe.
 
Problem is Amna what we see , we believe that. Violent minorities should be stopped at any cost. There should not be any strategic assets. Then only people can believe.

The problem is when you like to play the victim card over and over again so every Muslim necessarily has to be barbaric and every minority in a Muslim country, oppressed thats you're stereotypical thinking i am not saying its perfect either but if you prefer to think on those lines and remain blind to how the people in these societies do think and function then its upto you. Nobody can make you see things you don't want to see.
 
Its surprising that nobody gets any recognition until they endorse the western sponsored image of Islam and Pakistan and when people speak against it they are branded as so and so. Again hypocritical principles which are applied to a single side.

How does that work out? Malala doesn't sound like the sponsored(western) image of Islam and Pakistan at all:


http://dawn.com/news/1048217/malala-supports-talks-with-taliban

http://news.sky.com/story/1153544/malala-tells-obama-end-the-drone-strikes

Then again, a bullet to the face is a persuasive way to see things their way.
 
Criticizing her doesn't mean by default i am a taliban supporter please get that straight.

When did I ever infer that? My message was quite the opposite. You Pakistanis need to learn to deduce simple English.
 
When did I ever infer that?

Most people do often come to this flawed conclusion.

On topic, Its no longer surprising even in our talk shows we have a so called west sympathiser, a religious leader and a political analyst who fight it out. Anyways as long as you worship the western ideals and bash Islam and your own people by creating a false image, you are always rewarded generously.
 
I support the work Malala is doing. She is talking about children's right to education everywhere in the world. We have to stop feeling sorry for her or criticizing her and start helping in our own ways to get children educated around the world. She is playing a positive role. If she is in the limelight then it helps the cause more as it is an easy way to get the message across the world. Lets stop doubting what is everyone's intentions here and just do what one can do to improve lives.
 

Back
Top Bottom