What's new

India Declares Sharia Courts/Laws as illegal

Status
Not open for further replies.

BJP*

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Messages
877
Reaction score
0
Sharia Courts, fatwas illegal: Supreme Court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment on Monday and declared that no legal sanctions have been given to the Sharia Courts and religious decrees or fatwas are illegal if they tread on the rights of an individual.

The apex court further objected to the Shariat Courts ordering punishments against innocent people and said that no religion permits the same.

The SC also said that 'Darul Qaza' should not pass any judgment pertaining to the rights of an individual unless asked by the concerned person.

The deliver by the apex court was given after a petition challenging the legality of the Shariat Courts was filed by a Delhi based lawyer Vishwa Lochan Madan in 2005.

In his petition, he stated that institutions like Darul Qaza and Darul-iftaa are operating like parallel courts which take decisions on the fundamental rights of the Muslim citizens.

He also reportedly said that religious clerics qazis and muftis appointed by them cannot take a call on the liberty of the Muslims by issuing fatwas and curtail their fundamental rights.

The petitioner further argued that the Darul Qaza and Darul-iftaa operate in Muslim dominated districts where people cannot oppose the rulings.

Citing an example, the petitioner stated that a Muslim girl had to desert her husband because a fatwa directed her to live with her father-in-law who had allegedly raped her.

The apex court had reserved the judgment in the case in February earlier this year and had reportedly said that it cannot interfere with the religious decrees issued by the Muslim clerics.

The court further told the petitioner that “some fatwas may be wise and issued for the general good also,” the news report stated.

Shariat Courts Have No Legal Sanction: Supreme Court - NDTV

First Published: Monday, July 07, 2014, 09:12
-----------------------------

This is truly a landmark decision. Country can not afford parallel Islamic courts. Its good they are now banned now forever and its is also been ruled that even opinion can not be passed in light of islamic laws untill concerned parties themselves approach to shariya adaalat. Disobeying Supreme Court would invite serious punishment to sharia courts
 
clipart-4c9pL7pcE
 
Various religious communities live all around the world and they accept Uniform Civil Code. No need for any personal community/religion based laws. Even the word secular implies common law for all citizens. :p:
 
Sharia Courts, fatwas illegal: Supreme Court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment on Monday and declared that no legal sanctions have been given to the Sharia Courts and religious decrees or fatwas are illegal if they tread on the rights of an individual.

The apex court further objected to the Shariat Courts ordering punishments against innocent people and said that no religion permits the same.

Great move!!
If we want to be a developed nation we must move ahead of stone age mentality!
There is (MUST) no place for religious mullahs/ Church/ Sadhus/ Cast bigots in our society.
 
the article doesnt say that they r banned.....SC seems to have limited there power..
--
they have power sourced from religeous text... which is non madetoary.. and have no legal sanction in INDIA...
accept or rejct at WIill.. freeedom of religion as per INDIAN CONSTITUTION...
SC also directing waht they like..to have...
Universal law for india
 
Another anti muslim act under modi govt
Modi is still Muslim hater and he will show more in coming days
--
bro...
india ...executive -PM and judiciary - SC
are separate body...cant influence their judgment...
Modi have liberty to hate anybody as indivial
but as PM its his duty to respect ALLL indians ...
--
more is coming ...
for good from right channel ..
---
 
Another anti muslim act under modi govt
Modi is still Muslim hater and he will show more in coming days

Mere existence of non-Muslims is an anti-Muslim act.

Language of the SC verdict suggests that the UPA government managed to appoint some Sickular Judges in the court. May be they fear beheading hence the verdict was properly sugar-coated.
 
Not nearly good enough, either scrap the terms secular and republic from the constitution or raze all these extra-judicial structures to the ground. There can only be one source of law which devolves down unto the people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom