What's new

India-Pakistan unlikely to break impasse soon: US

there is one famous quotation in punjabi .............. "Pind wasya nhi chakay pahlay pounch gaye"
 
I support war with india. Once we defeat india swiftly and liberate IOK then india will have no choice but to accept peace on Pakistan's terms.

I support you 100%. I'm sick of this bickering and fighting everyday. India and Pakistan should go to war and the winner should colonize the losers.
 
Chhod yaar, main to bas apni boss ki frustration PDF pe nikal raha tha. Kuchh war shar nahi hone waala. :cheers:

Haha! Yaar..koi thread khol lo bhai..jahaan sab apne apne zaalim bosses ke saath experiences batayenge...aur tackle karne ke tarike bhi! I'm tackling a co**suc**r
 
The same could be said of the China-India border dispute.

Any real solutions are unlikely.

Now did "China" appear in the thread title??

On-topic:
The assessment is quite accurate. Not much movement is likely yet, for the simple reason that there are elements in Pakistan that wish that such progress must not take place. The recent speech by Hafizzz Sayeed is just one evidence of that. Right now, these elements are strong enough to create problems for GoP if they see any moves that they disapprove of.
So, till then.......
 
India can live with status quo. We have some dispute with China too. It business as usual. Buying "peace" with Pakistan does nothing beside us losing some quality entertainment. Right Hawk Eyes;)
 
Like I said before status quo seems the most probable and realistic solution.... not to mention India, China and pakistan all have nukes.

India keeps Jammu and Kashmir (including Siachen ;)) & Arunachal
China keeps Aksai Chin, Shaksham Valley
pakistan keeps Gilgit - Baltistan and Azad Kashmir

Done
 
I support war with india. Once we defeat india swiftly and liberate IOK then india will have no choice but to accept peace on Pakistan's terms.

Same here man!!...you have to teach the evil bharthis a lesson!!

OT- The current LOC and LAC should be made IB. That is the only solution.
 
I support war with india. Once we defeat india swiftly and liberate IOK then india will have no choice but to accept peace on Pakistan's terms.

@ you^^ and your type's...

soldier-baby.jpg


Best of Luck :tup:



@Topic..

I personelly don't think that there is any other solution of this boundry dispute. Only thing that come's in mind is just making current border's as IB .Joint governence of J&K is just bullshyt!

Only solution is to make current Border as IB and make progress in your own respective country devolop economy and live peacefully :coffee:
 
Pakistan-based militant group expanding: U.S. admiral
By Phil Stewart

WASHINGTON | Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:11am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A top U.S. military commander expressed concern to Congress on Tuesday about the expanding reach of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group, warning it was no longer solely focused on India or even South Asia.

LeT, one of the largest and best-funded Islamic militant organizations in the region, is blamed for the November 2008 attacks on Mumbai, which killed 166 people in India's commercial capital.

The group was nurtured by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency to fight India in Kashmir, and analysts say it is still unofficially tolerated even though Islamabad banned the group nearly a decade ago.

Admiral Robert Willard, head of the U.S. military's Pacific Command, told a Senate hearing the United States was actively working with South Asian governments including Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, the Maldives and India to contain LeT.

But he cautioned that the group was active elsewhere.

"Unquestionably they have spread their influence internationally and are no longer solely focused in South Asia and on India," Willard told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The United States has evidence of LeT's presence in Europe and the broader Asia-Pacific region, he said.

In the past, LeT has fielded militants in Canada and in the United States.

India continues to be LeT's main target. But Willard noted that the group has declared holy war against the United States and renewed longstanding concerns in Washington about attacks by LeT militants against U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

"The discussion regarding the government of Pakistan's relationship to LeT is a very sensitive one," Willard said.

The comments come at a sensitive time in U.S.-Pakistan relations. Pakistan is demanding the United States scale back CIA activities and reduce the number U.S. Special Forces trainers in the latest example of strained security ties.

Although the U.S. focus in Pakistan remains on al Qaeda and militant groups more deeply involved in Afghanistan, there has been increasing attention in Washington on LeT, particularly since the arrest of Pakistani-American David Headley in 2009.

Headley had joined LeT hoping to fight in Kashmir but ended up scouting out targets for the Mumbai attackers and helping al Qaeda plan a strike in Denmark.

"It's important that this particular discussion continue to take place and that we continue to work with the government of Pakistan to root out terrorism that exists within their borders," Willard said.

The White House last week warned that despite unprecedented efforts by Pakistan to go after militants within its borders, it lacked a clear path to defeat them.
 

Back
Top Bottom