What's new

Indian Army denies reports of Pak shooting down its 'spy drone'

Pakistan : Happy of shooting an Indian Drone

India : Happy because the drone shot down was not an India......

Both seems to happy, then why argue over it?
 
where its said from police drone? and even if it was police drone its good to shot it down if its came near to LOC


still better then ISI spy kabootar :rofl::rofl::rofl:
Yeah, Kabootar was dumb.

However, the recent events has shown it again and again. Crow Biriyani it is.
 
Atleast we dont call it an enemy aircraft or drone, & go bonkars celebrating. :coffee:
It was an unauthorized aircraft operating in Pakistani airspace close to the LoC where a hostile military is deployed - any unauthorized 'drone' would be treated as 'potential enemy aircraft' and shot down - what's so hard to understand about that?

Yeah, Kabootar was dumb.

However, the recent events has shown it again and again. Crow Biriyani it is.
I fail to see the analogy - the Indians arrested a pigeon, Pakistani forces shot down an unauthorized aircraft (as they should have done) - whether the aircraft was Indian military or being used by private citizens on either side of the LoC is irrelevant.
 
It was an unauthorized aircraft operating in Pakistani airspace close to the LoC where a hostile military is deployed - any unauthorized 'drone' would be treated as 'potential enemy aircraft' and shot down - what's so hard to understand about that?


I fail to see the analogy - the Indians arrested a pigeon, Pakistani forces shot down an unauthorized aircraft (as they should have done) - whether the aircraft was Indian military or being used by private citizens on either side of the LoC is irrelevant.
You quoted the wrong person here, @Imran Khan compared the two.

The Crow Biryani part is without knowing whether it was an Indian Drone or not your ISPR announced it as an Indian Spy Drone :lol:

Pay attention to the bold part in the above statement, nobody is contesting the reasoning for shooting it down.

Whether it was shot down or not is another topic as the drone does not exhibit any high energy projectile damage.
 
You quoted the wrong person here, @Imran Khan compared the two.

The Crow Biryani part is without knowing whether it was an Indian Drone or not your ISPR announced it as an Indian Spy Drone :lol:

Pay attention to the bold part in the above statement, nobody is contesting the reasoning for shooting it down.

Whether it was shot down or not is another topic as the drone does not exhibit any high energy projectile damage.
It was an unauthorized drone in Pakistani territory close to the LOC, meant for taking images, the assumption it was an Indian spy drone was a correct one on the part of the ISPR. Who else (and for what purpose) would be operating a drone meant to capture images around the LoC?
 
It was an unauthorized drone in Pakistani territory close to the LOC, meant for taking images, the assumption it was an Indian spy drone was a correct one on the part of the ISPR. Who else (and for what purpose) would be operating a drone meant to capture images around the LoC?
Assumption, yeah.
There are many people who would want to own a drone just for the kicks, but heck how can ISPR's assumption be wrong :D
Thx!
 
Assumption, yeah.
There are many people who would want to own a drone just for the kicks, but heck how can ISPR's assumption be wrong :D
Thx!
Not many people who would choose to fly it close to military posts on a Line of Control with two hostile militaries facing each other ... ISPR's assumption was correct.
 
Right, so do you have an actual reason for why ISPR should not have treated an unauthorized drone over Pakistani territory close to the LoC as an Indian spy drone?

It was a CHINESE DRONE

Pakistan shot down its OWN DRONE
Apparently Chinese drones can be purchased in India, so the manufacturer doesn't inherently mean it was Pakistani.
 
Right, so do you have an actual reason for why ISPR should not have treated an unauthorized drone over Pakistani territory close to the LoC as an Indian spy drone?

Not many people who would choose to fly it close to military posts on a Line of Control with two hostile militaries facing each other ... ISPR's assumption was correct.

Not Many =! None.
I cannot explain you better that this, understand what you can and please stop quoting me for you stupid questions.
 
It was a Pakistani drone used by Punjab (Pakistani Punjab ) Police
How do you know? Is Punjab police the only entity that has purchased this drone? And why would Punjab police be operating the drone in Kashmir, especially considering the fact that the range would not allow operation of the drone around the LoC from Punjab?

Not Many =! None.
I cannot explain you better that this, understand what you can and please stop quoting me for you stupid questions.
'Not many' also strongly implies that motive behind drone operations and source was Indian security establishment, and argues in favor of the ISPR assumption that the drone was an Indian spy drone.

The only 'stupid' statement here is the Indian position that there is no possibility it could have been an Indian security establishment drone - the ISPR assumption is the most feasible and likely situation.
 

Back
Top Bottom