What's new

Indian Mujahideen a product of Gujarat Riots

Not true. Satwant Singh and Beant Singh the two bodyguards were not Khalistanis. They killed Indira Gandhi because she attacked Darbar Sahib killing thousands of Sikh pilgrims. After Indira Gandhi was killed, the Congress carried out a general massacre of innocent Sikhs outside of Punjab who had nothing to do with Sikh militancy in Punjab.

Where you get this number of thousands of Sikh pilgrims being killed? that is bullshit

I know some Sikhs here in UK support Indira Gandhi to this day because they consider Bhindranwale to be a militant but others I know support the Khalistan movement

Dude, again- he could have done a lot. He did not, instead he decided to go for vengance to get political gains. Now you can make it look like something it is not. You can keep feeding your incredulity.


Mate I seen riots first hand here in Uk trust me if you think one man can prevent them you do not live in the real world, riots can spread over various towns and districs how can you predict where it will go next? Read about the riots we had in summer few years ago how it spread from London to cities like Birmingham and Manchester and small towns and you are saying it could be prevented?
 
Not true. Satwant Singh and Beant Singh the two bodyguards were not Khalistanis. They killed Indira Gandhi because she attacked Darbar Sahib killing thousands of Sikh pilgrims. After Indira Gandhi was killed, the Congress carried out a general massacre of innocent Sikhs outside of Punjab who had nothing to do with Sikh militancy in Punjab.

Indira Gandhi ordered attack on Darbar Sahib because terrorist was hiding there. I fully support that act.

Can you post proof of 'thousands of Sikh pilgrims' were killed in that attack ? :lol: ..............there goes your credibility.

The terrorists who killed Indira Gandhi stemmed from the same khalistani outlook hence they are and will always remain khalistani terrorists.
 
What about the riots going on in America now after that Zimmerman verdict? riots are spontaneous and spread like wild fire because of the mob mentality nothing to do with one man but a whole mob
 
http://www.hindtoday.com/Blogs/Docs/The_Rise_of_Jihad.pdf

Here is the original letter from Indian Mujahidin...they are like any other extremist muslim organisations full of hate for other religions and believe allah guides them to murder people of other faith...

IM is nothing but a part of SIMI which was founded in 1977...like other extremist muslim group they always search for reasons to spread islam.

And just like other extremist muslim groups they are illiterate fools who have not yet learned that nothing in this world is permanent, not your glory not your doom and not your religion..
 
http://www.hindtoday.com/Blogs/Docs/The_Rise_of_Jihad.pdf

Here is the original letter from Indian Mujahidin...they are like any other extremist muslim organisations full of hate for other religions and believe allah guides them to murder people of other faith...

IM is nothing but a part of SIMI which was founded in 1977...like other extremist muslim group they always search for reasons to spread islam.

And just like other extremist muslim groups they are illiterate fools who have not yet learned that nothing in this world is permanent, not your glory not your doom and not your religion..



The speeches they give is just petty propaganda but the leaders of IM are not some uneducated fools but infact smart tech savvy persons who should not be underestimated.
 
The allegation is not they he didn't stop riots (he could have) but he actively provoked it. At least one of his ministers is now convicted.

By your logic the Kashmiri riots that happened should create? Who would you blame?
 
Oh, they're just 'brainwashed' and modi has no role in this? EVery time the issue of the riots come up, the morons who support modi say that it was just a 'reaction' to Godhra. Well these jokers are taking the same line isn't it? It's just a 'reaction' to the riots. The role of the state is not to allow vengance or 'reaction' or venting of anger. If only Modi had done what he was supposed to- get the perpetrators of Godhra arrested, conducted a fair trial and had them punished through the due process of law instead of letting loose 1000s of his marauders on them, the IM would also not have had a moral justification.

Everybody knows that the Congress loves to encourage terrorism by spreading lies.

As regards Gujarat, it was Congressmen who burnt the train and later on it was Congressmen who rioted. Look at the number of Congressmen among the rioters brought to justice.

After indulging in so much butchery Congressmen go around promoting lunatic conspiracies that RSS did 26/11.
 
Islamist have no qualm slaughtering innumerable numbers of persons for their beliefs. They need any excuse, you could accidentally serve them tea that is too strong and they will create a "Lashkar-E-Chai" terrorist outfit.
 
Islamist have no qualm slaughtering innumerable numbers of persons for their beliefs. They need any excuse, you could accidentally serve them tea that is too strong and they will create a "Lashkar-E-Chai" terrorist outfit.

Yes, but Hindu RSS extremists and Modi doing the same thing is completely fine.
 
Yes, but Hindu RSS extremists and Modi doing the same thing is completely fine.

Those vegetarian RSS can't even look you in the eyes, yet alone try to kill you. Modi? That fool would have to take his insulin mid battle.
 
well babri demolition was a reaction to what? muslime invasion of india. so perfectly justified.
anyways a religion which teaches teror tactics will only produce t'rists. IM is not a result of gujarat. its always been there along with simi.

So Hindus reacted to Muslim invasion... after like 500 years?
Couldn't do it when British or Muslims were ruling you? :lol:

And if you justify revenge of Hindus, then you should also justify revenge of Muslims.
 

Back
Top Bottom