What's new

Iranians celebrate US victory over Iran in World Cup

I posted the exact language of the ordnance above.

Nowhere does it single out muslims only. But if only muslims have a problem with this law, then it's pretty obvious why.

India is a secular country. Our constitution and laws are dharma nirpeksh.

The term Love Jihad was first used by the Kerala High Court. A non BJP ruled state. And on petition by aggrieved Christians. Not Hindus.

Educate yourself. Your ignorance is bordering on embarrassing. And you are broad swathe judgmental to put the cherry on the cake of that embarrassing ignorance.
The word Jihad doesn't mean squat to you, yet you are using it in a law, you don't find that bizarre?
 
The word Jihad doesn't mean squat to you yet you are using it in a law, you don't find that bizarre?

What your definition of Jihad is does not mean squat to us.

To non muslims jihad is what muslims do in its name. Simple.

And again I repeat in the hope it gets across to you.

It is our courts of law who have used this term. If you have a problem with that, and if you are a citizen, filing a petition in protest should be easy. Just hire a half competent lawyer and pay him his fee.

The courts will likely throw you out on the first hearing. But at least they will give you the opportunity as an equal.
 
What your definition of Jihad is does not mean squat to us.

To non muslims jihad is what muslims do in its name. Simple.

And again I repeat in the hope it gets across to you.

It is our courts of law who have used this term. If you have a problem with that, and if you are a citizen, filing a petition in protest should be easy. Just hire a half competent lawyer and pay him his fee.

The courts will likely throw you out on the first hearing. But at least they will give you the opportunity as an equal.

Google Professor Jihad. A lot of names come up. Obviously, Jihad cannot mean Holy War. Jihad meaning is related to justice and righteousness. The so called Muslims falsely claiming to be Hindu aren't doing any Jihad. Islam isn't a religion of seeking converts by hook or crook. It is a faith.
 

Google Professor Jihad. A lot of names come up. Obviously, Jihad cannot mean Holy War. Jihad meaning is related to justice and righteousness. The so called Muslims falsely claiming to be Hindu aren't doing any Jihad. Islam isn't a religion of seeking converts by hook or crook. It is a faith.

That is good to know. But it is something muslims need to tackle on their own as it relates to their own community and faith.

But it has zero relevance to the non Muslim world.
 
That is good to know. But it is something muslims need to tackle on their own as it relates to their own community and faith.

But it has zero relevance to the non Muslim world.
Courts of law have to go by the real meaning of a word, not by political suppositions. That is the reason courts are designated separate from politics.
 
Courts of law have to go by the real meaning of a word, not by political suppositions. That is the reason courts are designated separate from politics.

The courts are going by the real meaning of the word. In the real world. As practiced by real people. You on the other hand are insisting on a theoretical ideal meaning which frankly has no relevance in the real world we live in and has not either for the past many decades of jihad around the world. There is no politics in love jihad. Muslims boys are not asking Hindu girls which party they support before moving their plans ahead.
 
The courts are going by the real meaning of the word. In the real world. As practiced by real people. You on the other hand are insisting on a theoretical ideal meaning which frankly has no relevance in the real world we live in and has not either for the past many decades of jihad around the world. There is no politics in love jihad. Muslims boys are not asking Hindu girls which party they support before moving their plans ahead.
University professors are idiots to call themselves Jihad? The courts have to explain what they are accusing people of. You don't give a squat what it means how do you know what they are accusing them of. The court does not know what it means either. Jihad is the wrong word to use.
 
University professors are idiots to call themselves Jihad? The courts have to explain what they are accusing people of. You don't give a squat what it means how do you know what they are accusing them of. The court does not know what it means either. Jihad is the wrong word to use.

I don't care about your obscure professors and their parents' choice in a name for them man.

If you do not agree I've already laid out the roadmap for you. If you are a citizen.

If you are not, you can keep debating here. Nothing more.
 
I don't care about your obscure professors and their parents' choice in a name for them man.

If you do not agree I've already laid out the roadmap for you. If you are a citizen.

If you are not, you can keep debating here. Nothing more.
Obscure is what you are accusing people of. The Professors can change their names. They don't because Jihad does not have opposing meanings.
 
Let us speak about the impact of those 56 muslim countries on the world today versus one Hindu India. Let me say this bluntly. No world civilization has ever become great following an adopted or forced ideology. Look at the most powerful countries in the world today. They are all true to their roots. Russia. China. America. France. I do not consider the UK to be great anymore.
you are the first Indian I've seen that is waking up to reality. If even 10% of Indians thought this way, I would be worried about competition from India.
 
you are the first Indian I've seen that is waking up to reality. If even 10% of Indians thought this way, I would be worried about competition from India.
There are hundreds of millions like me. Sure not all of them are as smooth in English. But the core DNA is the same. Watch. India has woken up and will achieve what is hers by right. And do it her way.
 
you are the first Indian I've seen that is waking up to reality. If even 10% of Indians thought this way, I would be worried about competition from India.
He is a load of contradiction. Adopts the word Jihad but doesn't know what it means. That is mediocrity. He is not the only one like that -- not confined to India.
 
He is a load of contradiction. Adopts the word Jihad but doesn't know what it means. That is mediocrity. He is not the only one like that, not only confined to India.
that's not the important part. the important part is that he understands the key is to be true to your national character, to understand your national character, and to use your people's strengths to the fullest.

Example:

China had proto-socialism even in the Han Dynasty with the state owned salt enterprise and the ideological foundations of egalitarian authoritarianism even earlier in the Warring States era with Legalism. Thus, China's current system is true to Chinese culture, and is worthy of inheriting the crown of Chinese civilization.

Indians must find a system, if they do not already have one, that is true to their culture, one that is worthy of inheriting the throne of India. Otherwise aping the system of others will never work.
 
that's not the important part. the important part is that he understands the key is to be true to your national character, to understand your national character, and to use your people's strengths to the fullest.

Example:

China had proto-socialism even in the Han Dynasty with the state owned salt enterprise and the ideological foundations of egalitarian authoritarianism even earlier in the Warring States era with Legalism. Thus, China's current system is true to Chinese culture, and is worthy of inheriting the crown of Chinese civilization.

Indians must find a system, if they do not already have one, that is true to their culture, one that is worthy of inheriting the throne of India. Otherwise aping the system of others will never work.
India is not China. It is very diverse. In Central Board Indian school we took pride in our diversity. India was a powerhouse in empires which accepted diversity. In the massive Maurya and Mughal empires, India's GDP ratio compared to the world was 10 times higher than now.
 
India is not China. It is very diverse. In Central Board Indian school we took pride in our diversity. India was a powerhouse in empires which accepted diversity. In the massive Maurya and Mughal empires, India's GDP ratio compared to the world was 10 times higher than now.

And then you went to Australia.

And it was all downhill from there.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom