What's new

Israel may become an apartheid state

Israel is a stable secular democratic country, arabs in Israel enjoy the kind of freedom unheard of in many Arab countries. As per the Israeli constitution it is a jewish state but treats all its citizens as equal, now how much of this secularism is implemented on the ground is debatable, but atleast the law of the land is just.
In this regards I find India and Israel to be almost equal.

Is a Jew better off in Pakistan than a Muslim is in Israel?

Maybe a hard question to answer considering that many/most were forced to leave.

Hmmm, there is a word for that, I probably remember that word in a minute...

Ethnic Something...
I say some sects of muslims are safer in Israel than in Pakistan. Sectarian violence and killing in Pakistan has taken thousands of lifes over the years, its almost a daily occurance.
 
Pretty funny how "apartheid Israel" is still better place to live for moderate muslims than any Arab state. Atleast in "Apartheid Israel" you can post anti Israel propaganda on internet.

Its unbelievable how Saudis and others are always there for Palestinians, but when it comes to their own population, they can kill and jail them whenever they want...
 
Israel should become absolutely monarchy state like ksa or choose dictator like Syria or rule by mullas like Iran or rule by people belongs to particular sect like Iraq or by military dictatorship like most of history of Pakistan to get respect from Muslim countries.

Only one thing is enough, they need people like you.
 
Pretty funny how "apartheid Israel" is still better place to live for moderate muslims than any Arab state. Atleast in "Apartheid Israel" you can post anti Israel propaganda on internet.

Its unbelievable how Saudis and others are always there for Palestinians, but when it comes to their own population, they can kill and jail them whenever they want...
Israelis are on stolen land of the Palestinians.
Time to send them all back to Poland and Ethiopia
 
Israelis are on stolen land of the Palestinians.
Time to send them all back to Poland and Ethiopia

When Israel was created, 70% of the land within the borders was land formerly owned
by the Ottoman Empire, and not by any individual.
The British Government had Control over that land during the mandate.
The government land was then legally transferred to the state if Israel.
Most settlements within the border, had already been purchased from rich land owners.
Their ownership might have been questionable according to Western standards,
but was perfectly all right according to Ottoman Law (see below)

Ownership of land according to the Ottoman land laws of 1858 was depending on cultivating it.
Stopping to cultivating the land for a certain time means that ownership is transferred
to the government.

Farmers did not have to purchase land, they just had to cultivate the land and then register its use.
Most didn't for tax evasive and other reasons, so very few actually owned their lands.

So all those Palestinians leaving the newly formed state of Israel also decided to
transfer the ownership of the land to the new government, according to the Ottoman Law.

http://www.beki.org/dvartorah/landlaw/

Your claim that land is stolen is therefore baseless.
The transfer is fully legal, and the corrupt Ottoman Empire is the one to blame for that.

The Ottoman law is also used to confiscate land on the West Bank.
That is why a lot of the settlements are on rocky hills which cannot be cultivated
got the approval from the Israeli supreme court, while others on better lands are ordered
to be closed.

A lot of the settlements can thus be blamed on Turkey.

When are Turkey going to apologize for that to the Palestinians, and every other group
that has been subjected to the unfair land code of 1858?
 
Last edited:
When are Turkey going to apologize for that to the Palestinians, and every other group
that has been subjected to the unfair land code of 1858?

Tomorrow we will apoligise !!

@A.P. Richelieu

I said TURKS protected those lands from Crusaders not Ottomans. Saladin was not a Kurd either. I know you are desperate to steal our national heroes. :lol:
There was nothing Kurdish back then.
 
Israelis are on stolen land of the Palestinians.
Time to send them all back to Poland and Ethiopia
Yeah, we should also send back Americans from US, every white and black from Americas. Arabs who came to NAfrica after islamic conquests should be sent back.

We should all just go back where we were at the beginning.
You dont seem to mind how Pakistan too is made from various peoples, not all of them want to belong in Pakistan.
 
Yeah, we should also send back Americans from US, every white and black from Americas. Arabs who came to NAfrica after islamic conquests should be sent back.

We should all just go back where we were at the beginning.
You dont seem to mind how Pakistan too is made from various peoples, not all of them want to belong in Pakistan.
What does this got to do with Pakistan?
 
Tomorrow we will apoligise !!

@A.P. Richelieu

I said TURKS protected those lands from Crusaders not Ottomans. Saladin was not a Kurd either. I know you are desperate to steal our national heroes. :lol:
There was nothing Kurdish back then.

History knows him as a kurd.
If Turks participated in the resistance of the Crusades, it was under Kurdish command.

image.jpeg


Yeah, we should also send back Americans from US, every white and black from Americas. Arabs who came to NAfrica after islamic conquests should be sent back.

We should all just go back where we were at the beginning.
You dont seem to mind how Pakistan too is made from various peoples, not all of them want to belong in Pakistan.

Don't forget to send the Turks back to central Asia :coffee: and let the Greeks back.
 
History knows him as a kurd.
If Turks participated in the resistance of the Crusades, it was under Kurdish command.

View attachment 356772



Don't forget to send the Turks back to central Asia :coffee: and let the Greeks back.
Kurds were slaves, that is it. They never fought the Crusades , they just read about it. like you do in history books.

Turks are Anatolian you Zionist troll.

Selahaddin Eyyubi and the Ayyubid dynasty was of Turk origin. The names "Böri/Buri", "Tuğtekin", "Turanşah" and "Şahinşah" of his brothers obviously proof that the Ayyubid dynasty was of Turk origin. Böri/Buri means "Wolf".

We should think, why did the Arabic dynasties(whom were puppets of the Seljukids) not have (so obviously) Turk names, and on the contrary, why does the Ayyubid Dynasty have so many important and Names of obviously Turk origin? How can it be reasonable and logical, that such a strong dynasty and ruler like the Ayyubid Dynasty and Selahaddin Eyyubi, will be forced to use Turk names? The reason for the use of Turk names is clearly because of the Turk ethnic origin of the Ayyubid Dynasty.

This should shut you all up now.
 
Kurds were slaves, that is it. They never fought the Crusades , they just read about it. like you do in history books.

Turks are Anatolian you Zionist troll.

Selahaddin Eyyubi and the Ayyubid dynasty was of Turk origin. The names "Böri/Buri", "Tuğtekin", "Turanşah" and "Şahinşah" of his brothers obviously proof that the Ayyubid dynasty was of Turk origin. Böri/Buri means "Wolf".

We should think, why did the Arabic dynasties(whom were puppets of the Seljukids) not have (so obviously) Turk names, and on the contrary, why does the Ayyubid Dynasty have so many important and Names of obviously Turk origin? How can it be reasonable and logical, that such a strong dynasty and ruler like the Ayyubid Dynasty and Selahaddin Eyyubi, will be forced to use Turk names? The reason for the use of Turk names is clearly because of the Turk ethnic origin of the Ayyubid Dynasty.

This should shut you all up now.

Turks were servants to Muslims brought from Central Asia, and then went on to conquer Anatolia from the Byzantines,
and moved their tribe into the area, something now considered to be a war crime.
As you can see, Turks are not considered to be an ancient Anatolian people.

Your names can only be found on Turkish Websites, so that Turkey is trying to steal the history
of the Kurds seems to be a perfectly viable explanation to me.
The rest of the world considers Saladin to be a kurd.


image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Turks were servants to Muslims brought from Central Asia, and then went on to conquer Anatolia from the Byzantines,
and moved their tribe into the area, something now considered to be a war crime.
As you can see, Turks are. Not considered to be. An ancient Anatolian people.

View attachment 356775 View attachment 356776
What happened to the Anatolians..did they all die?:lol:
 

Back
Top Bottom