ghazi52
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Messages
- 101,802
- Reaction score
- 106
- Country
- Location
,..,.
Hasnaat Malik
March 15, 2023
Supreme Court (SC) senior puisne judge Justice Qazi Faez Isa on Wednesday raised a question on the constitution of special benches by the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP).
Earlier, CJP Umar Ata Bandial had formed a three-judge special bench, led by Justice Isa, to hear a suo motu case related to examining the grant of 20 additional marks to a Hafiz-e-Quran student while admitting them for an MBBS/BDS degree. Other members of the bench are Justice Yahya
The suo motu was numbered last year and the bench was to see if it fell in line with the MBBS and BDS (Admission, House Job and Internship) Regulations 2018.
It may be noted also that this was the first time the CJP had included Justice Isa in a special bench hearing a suo motu case.
Further, it was reported in January last year that a bench led by Justice Isa, while hearing a matter, had questioned the policy of granting additional marks to Hafiz-e-Quran students. This had led senior lawyers to question if a judge, who has already disclosed his opinion on a certain matter, should hear a suo motu case on the same issue.
Meanwhile, after the issuance of the cause list, legal experts had also begun debating as to whether or not the winds, or at the very least, a slight breeze of change had started blowing in the apex court, where questions were being raised for not including two senior-most judges -- Justice Isa and Justice Sardar Tariq Masood -- in special or larger benches hearing constitutional and politically sensitive high-profile cases.
There is a strong perception that some particular judges are being included in most of the politically sensitive matters for the last five years, while others are not - a matter made further controversial by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah's remarks in another case.
During the proceedings on Wednesday, Justice Isa questioned whether SC Rules allow the constitution of special benches in the first place.
"Where is the concept of special bench," he asked noting that "they (the three) judges were sitting in different benches in the morning".
He said the constitution of special benches would create "misgivings" and open the apex court to "criticism".
Attorney General for Pakistan Shehzad Ata Elahi said that there were precedents but nonetheless sought time from the court to assist on the matter.
Justice Isa also wondered why the matter of granting 20 additional points to a student was fixed after 14 months.
Expressing his deep concerns, the senior judge said that the SC "is a completely unaccountable institution" and that therefore "we must proceed with utmost caution".
"What is the due process", Justice Isa asked, "if one case is fixed for hearing for the very next day after being filed while another is listed after a delay of several months?"
The SC judge also expressed reservations about the ban placed on criticising state institutions -- in particular the conduct of superior courts -- by the country's media regulatory body (PEMRA).
"Why should my conduct not be discussed if I do something wrong?" he said, "does PEMRA want to create a police state?"
He also asked what the term 'state institutions' even meant.
"The Federal Shariat Court could even declare the PEMRA orders as unIslamic", he remarked.
tribune.com.pk
Justice Isa questions provisions of 'special bench' constitution
Senior SC judge asks under what law special benches constituted, why some cases fixed sooner than othersHasnaat Malik
March 15, 2023
Supreme Court (SC) senior puisne judge Justice Qazi Faez Isa on Wednesday raised a question on the constitution of special benches by the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP).
Earlier, CJP Umar Ata Bandial had formed a three-judge special bench, led by Justice Isa, to hear a suo motu case related to examining the grant of 20 additional marks to a Hafiz-e-Quran student while admitting them for an MBBS/BDS degree. Other members of the bench are Justice Yahya
The suo motu was numbered last year and the bench was to see if it fell in line with the MBBS and BDS (Admission, House Job and Internship) Regulations 2018.
It may be noted also that this was the first time the CJP had included Justice Isa in a special bench hearing a suo motu case.
Further, it was reported in January last year that a bench led by Justice Isa, while hearing a matter, had questioned the policy of granting additional marks to Hafiz-e-Quran students. This had led senior lawyers to question if a judge, who has already disclosed his opinion on a certain matter, should hear a suo motu case on the same issue.
Meanwhile, after the issuance of the cause list, legal experts had also begun debating as to whether or not the winds, or at the very least, a slight breeze of change had started blowing in the apex court, where questions were being raised for not including two senior-most judges -- Justice Isa and Justice Sardar Tariq Masood -- in special or larger benches hearing constitutional and politically sensitive high-profile cases.
There is a strong perception that some particular judges are being included in most of the politically sensitive matters for the last five years, while others are not - a matter made further controversial by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah's remarks in another case.
During the proceedings on Wednesday, Justice Isa questioned whether SC Rules allow the constitution of special benches in the first place.
"Where is the concept of special bench," he asked noting that "they (the three) judges were sitting in different benches in the morning".
He said the constitution of special benches would create "misgivings" and open the apex court to "criticism".
Attorney General for Pakistan Shehzad Ata Elahi said that there were precedents but nonetheless sought time from the court to assist on the matter.
Justice Isa also wondered why the matter of granting 20 additional points to a student was fixed after 14 months.
Expressing his deep concerns, the senior judge said that the SC "is a completely unaccountable institution" and that therefore "we must proceed with utmost caution".
"What is the due process", Justice Isa asked, "if one case is fixed for hearing for the very next day after being filed while another is listed after a delay of several months?"
The SC judge also expressed reservations about the ban placed on criticising state institutions -- in particular the conduct of superior courts -- by the country's media regulatory body (PEMRA).
"Why should my conduct not be discussed if I do something wrong?" he said, "does PEMRA want to create a police state?"
He also asked what the term 'state institutions' even meant.
"The Federal Shariat Court could even declare the PEMRA orders as unIslamic", he remarked.
Justice Isa questions provisions of 'special bench' constitution | The Express Tribune
Senior SC judge asks under what law special benches constituted, why some cases fixed sooner than others
