What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
If we dont want to watch ur channels then how can u force us to watch?

Are u telling me that no Indian channel is banned in ur country then u r certainly not living in Pakistan. :rofl:

Call it hypocrisy or double standards, we dont want to watch ur channels. Sorry.

And yes, the youth does get brainwashed, they are young and get poisoned easily.

And just to add, we have like 150+ Indian channels in our cities, so no time to watch outside channels also.
 
When pak channels are fuelling the fire and istigating the separatists and their paid henchmen, this is good step to calm the situation.

Entertainment channels are still available, there is no need to make an issue of it.

please give me proof of one such incident when PAKISTANI CHANNELS FUELLED OR INSTIGATED THE SEPRATISTS!!! ANY CHANNEL!!! waiting for your reply with proof! :wave:
 
Now how are people going to see "Mera Namn hey muhabat"? This is an outrage, get the lynch mob together, im off to see the Indian High Commissioner :D
 
Futile attempt by the GOI. Sooner or later India has to move it's butt out of IOK. I wonder why they take such useless actions.

:disagree:
 
Simple are Indian News channels shown in pakistan ?

Cable operators are not stopped from showing Indian news channels. And Punjab's areas India get Indian channels even through normal antenna, the Govt of Pakistan did not take any measure to stop the signals unlike Indian orange govt
 
Every Pakistani members are seems to interested only in Kashmir freedom movement but I have not seen any member supported the Baluchistan freedom movement are they are not human or they don't deserve the any support. Baluchistan is become like a jail no media is allowed there because of that civilian casualties may come to media or known to other part of the world.

Balochistan is Pakistan's internal matter and not a disputed territory unlike IOK. You don't increase your blood pressure level for it.

:)

---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 PM ----------

from when,when they shown some videos which is a classic example of bastards working for bastards to create tensions

Why are you getting so bastard. Frustration. Grow up kid. Post something sane.

:)
 
hey, its simple, we don't wanna see your channel. ur country have banned our movies and channels in pakistan for so long. now we did the same, u feeling the pain?? on the other, indians channels, movies are very popular in pakistan. dare to refute it. even your generals and prime ministers watch indians movies, dont u watch???


WE???????
We are not talking about Bhartis aka Indians we are talking about Kashmiris and the showing of Pakistani Private NEWS channels by cable operators proves that People of Kashmir want to watch these unbiased, neutral news sources instead of Indian propaganda.


The forced ban by Indian occupying govt proves that Bhartis are afraid of truth and bhartis know in their heart that Kashmiris want to watch these channels.

Big PERIOD
 
The order is an act of frustration. Pakistani channels have been banned in the "largest democracy in the world" because the Pakistani channels discussed and showed the mass graves of Kashmiris. The mass graves are for victims of the excesses of the 100,000 Indian security forces that are present in Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

Obviously the present puppet government in Occupied Jammu and Kashmir does not want the denizens of the valley to be aware that the Indian Security forces murdered and then buried innocent Kashmiri civilians in mass graves.

The situation appears to be heading toward 1947 situation when hot potatoes were stuck into the mouths of people who listened to Radio Pakistan.

But I believe the blocking of TV channels is not going to make a major difference. All channels are available on Internet and those can be watch on smaller screen.


"suchai jhup nahin sukti banawat keh asoolon seh

kushboo aa nahin suktee kaghaz keh phoolon seh"
 
08sld3.jpg



Ma da laadla bigad gaya
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
China is providing tacit support to Pakistan in its jihadi strategy with an aim to pin down half a million Indian troops in Kashmir, a leading European security expert has said.
Beijing has provided direct protection to these terrorist groups at the UN Security Council's 1267 committee, blocking efforts against Jamaat-ud-Dawa (the Lashkar-e-Tayiba front)," Andrew Small, an European expert has said.

Writing in the latest issues of the Washington Quarterly journal, Small of German Marshall Fund of the US said that the Chinese managed to bar action against JuD, until political pressure on Pakistan escalated after the LeT involvement in the November 2008 Mumbai attacks.

08sld1.jpg


Labelling the Chinese policy as that of "managing tensions" in the South Asian region, the security expert said this was at odds with the US which was working hard to convince Pakistan to move away from India-centric military strategy.

Small also said that China had propped up Pakistan's conventional military capabilities by providing full spectrum of support to Islamabad's air and land missiles and 'tacit support for the jihadi strategy that has helped to bind half-a-million troops in Kashmir.'

Based in Brussels, Small noted that the Chinese approach in the case of its ****** policy is 'proving increasingly' unsuccessful.


08sld2.jpg


08sld3.jpg



"As is true of its foreign policy elsewhere, China pursues a relatively narrow conception of its interests in Afghanistan and Pakistan, rather than supporting a more widely shared set of goals," he said.

"Security for its workers and major investment projects has deteriorated the Chinese while the US role in the region has expanded, much to Beijng's discomfort," Small said.
"There is a debate starting in China about whether a strategic reassessment is needed, which has already resulted in a few tactical shifts on Beijing's part. But until China is forced to go through a more fundamental reappraisal of its strategy for dealing with extremism in the region, prospects for the US and China to pursue complementary policies will remain limited," he said.

"The strength of the Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP) has also been a concern to China. While initially sanguine about the Pakistani government's deals in Swat and Buner, they became increasingly worried that the writ of the Pakistani state was running out in a territory that runs dangerously close to the principal Sino-Pakistani trade route, the KKH," he said.


:rofl::rofl: kis idiot ne yeh bakwas likhi ha jiss ka na sar ha na pair :hang2:
 
humm...... nahhh still gay

Have respect for other peoples culture, you may live in a western society where that may be considered homosexual, but in another society yhat may represent something else. One example is the french "kissing" on the cheek on another man, when in fact it is more having the face nearer to the others at a rotated angle. Such ignorance can only be bad, as is evident from a lot of conflicts.
 
Why the hell would they support jihadis in Kashmir when they know that this spirit is causing them problems in Xinjiang already.

You think they are stupid to create problems for themselves? I think not.

Tell the idiot who authored this to waste his time over something else.
 

Back
Top Bottom