What's new

Let's not forget when Netanyahu revealed his true targets: "First is called Iran, and the Second is called Pakistan".

Just because a certain civilian sentiment exist doesn't mean the army is shitting and isn't navigating strategic elements. But none of this matter because the beloved was booted out and people put men before state.

Which is why India made civilians shaheed via the LoC and the army hasn't responded!
 
Pakistan army is working for the Americans. So its already a soft target. Look at the muted response on Israeli aggression.

Pakistan army is an army of cowards which fights its own people and stand with the criminals instead of with the nation.
 
I disagree with Turkey, it's a liberalised nationalist country, the majority may feel sympathy but don't really care to materially do something about Israel because it simply has nothing to do with their interests.

Won't Pakistan fall in the same category ?
 
1697862502649.png
 
Pakistan and Iran are 2 powerful Islamic states, they must sign a defence treaty so if one state gets attacked then its a attack on both. Just a simple defence treaty, nothing to do with fighting wars in other lands etc but just for protection from foreign invasions, separatism, terrorism.

Bad idea and won't work. What if KSA vs Iran or Turkey Vs Iran war starts? Can you then join on Iran's side and attack KSA?
 
I disagree with Turkey, it's a liberalised nationalist country, the majority may feel sympathy but don't really care to materially do something about Israel because it simply has nothing to do with their interests.

Meanwhile the constant fear mongering of a possible Islamic regime coming to power in Pakistan that would actually materially do something is something Netanyahu actually believes is a possibility

Only the elite areas. Rural areas are conservative. Much like Pakistan is divided between rural conservatives and urban liberals.

Pakistan and Iran are 2 powerful Islamic states, they must sign a defence treaty so if one state gets attacked then its a attack on both. Just a simple defence treaty, nothing to do with fighting wars in other lands etc but just for protection from foreign invasions, separatism, terrorism.

And what if Iran attacks Pakistan? It has plenty of pro-Iranian proxies within the country. They were ready to raid Balochistan for suspected militants.

They've got good ties with India. Why are Pakistanis so blind? Are you a Shia Muhajir?
 
Last edited:
Only the elite areas. Rural areas are conservative. Much like Pakistan is divided between rural conservatives and urban liberals.



And what if Iran attacks Pakistan? It has plenty of pro-Iranian proxy within the country. They were ready to raid Balochistan for suspected militants.

They've got good ties with India. Why are Pakistanis so blind? Are you a Shia Muhajir?

LOL Why would Iran attack Pakistan? Absolutely rubbish.
 

Go to 25:55-27:00 of the video to hear the quote.


While Israel is now set on expanding territory, we must be on our guard now and get Imran Khan back to power as soon as possible with whatever it takes.
His ultimate target is corruption. He gave weapons in the hands of Hamas, then he earned money from other side bombing Hamas. He is fooling no one, but Israelis.
 
Explain the idiom.
Explaining an idiom to a idiot*

Oh, that falls under the same category like me telling you that, "You couldn't find your forehead with a map & a flashlight."

*probably mallu
 
Pakistanis keep searching for any israeli aur jewish comment abt Pakistan and use it as some evidence to prove its thekedari of Islam or some kind of delusion. What a retarded mentality, what idiots, u r a slave already, u cant have an independent foreign policy.. seems as if a nation brought up on opium.
 
Explaining an idiom to a idiot*

Oh, that falls under the same category like me telling you that, "You couldn't find your forehead with a map & a flashlight."

*probably mallu

Explaining an idiom to an Indian is like reading poetry to a donkey.
 

Back
Top Bottom