What's new

Maryam Nawaz lashes out at Supreme Court judges

This is not a complicated case and if you read the judge comments they have already made the decision. There is no need to pressurize the Supreme Court.
 
What's cooking now?

It's been more than 15 minutes

Probably they want assurance from PTI that they'll dissolve the assemblies immodest after Verdict to announce elections in provinces too
Dissolve assembly? Why? By elections just happened there
 
Party leader role should be minimized in this case else even if Elahi becomes punjab CM, on very next day Punjab governor will ask him to take vote of confidence and than Shujhaat again will issue a letter to his MPAs, this time well in advance, not to vote at all.

This is not easy decision to make since PDM will use Ch Shujhaat again and again.
 
People need to understand , the decision need to come today , otherwise
The Mafia will find a way to manipulate system

Come out on street and demand Justice Today !!!
They have made the Choor , a interim CM no care was taken to strip him off the powers


What full bench or Half Bench ?


Decide on the case 186 won and 179 lost
 
Party leader role should be minimized in this case else even if Elahi becomes punjab CM, on very next day Punjab governor will ask him to take vote of confidence and than Shujhaat again will issue a letter to his MPAs, this time well in advance, not to vote at all.

This is not easy decision to make since PDM will use Ch Shujhaat again and again.

No.

Ch Shujaat's letter has no authority, it is the parliamentary party which decides, not party head.
 
SC case se ziada yahan maza aaraha hai

1658762493399.png
 
I think now I understand why N is confusing everyone.

63-A does not say anything about the votes of a defected member being counted or not. This is what the SC interpreted, that the votes cannot be counted. This is what the SC said from it's own understanding in the original reference.

But right now, the case isn't this, keh vote discount hongay ya nhn. The case right now is whether the party head or parliamentary party is binding.

If you go against the direction, votes will be discounted, that part is set in stone. But on who's direction? That is the question. The Dy Speaker says it is the political party, while the law and previous SC judgement and PTI says it's parliamentary party.

So there's two steps, the direction comes, and if a member defects then he gets disqualified.

N wants to skip step 1, and go direct to step 2, keh defected members kay vote count nhn karnay, and they take support of the SC judgement, that is not in dispute. Magr how can you go directly to step 2 without taking step 1?

Secondly, Ch Shujaat's own daughter voted for Pervez Elahi! Can you imagine this, and she said on the floor of the house to Raja Basharat at that time keh main abhi ghar say arahi hoon, aur mujhay Ch Shujaat nay aisa kuch nhn kaha!

SC case se ziada yahan maza aaraha hai

View attachment 865167

Just another step in the good cop bad cop, Nawaz ko Shahbaz nay marwa dia routine.
 
I think now I understand why N is confusing everyone.

63-A does not say anything about the votes of a defected member being counted or not. This is what the SC interpreted, that the votes cannot be counted. This is what the SC said from it's own understanding in the original reference.

But right now, the case isn't this, keh vote discount hongay ya nhn. The case right now is whether the party head or parliamentary party is binding.

If you go against the direction, votes will be discounted, that part is set in stone. But on who's direction? That is the question. The Dy Speaker says it is the political party, while the law and previous SC judgement and PTI says it's parliamentary party.

So there's two steps, the direction comes, and if a member defects then he gets disqualified.

N wants to skip step 1, and go direct to step 2, keh defected members kay vote count nhn karnay, and they take support of the SC judgement, that is not in dispute. Magr how can you go directly to step 2 without taking step 1?

Secondly, Ch Shujaat's own daughter voted for Pervez Elahi! Can you imagine this, and she said on the floor of the house to Raja Basharat at that time keh main abhi ghar say arahi hoon, aur mujhay Ch Shujaat nay aisa kuch nhn kaha!



Just another step in the good cop bad cop, Nawaz ko Shahbaz nay marwa dia routine.

Because Zardari forged letter with shujaat’s greedy sons.

Elahi family all have vataa satta marriages. P Elahi sister is married to Shujaat, while Shujaat daughter is married to Elahi’s brother’s son... ect ect


Zardari essentially destroyed elahi family and also noon league in one master stroke. :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom