What's new

No Longer in Shadows, Pentagon’s U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public

King Julien

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
509
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
For over a decade, the program, now tucked inside the Office of Naval Intelligence, has discussed mysterious events in classified briefings.

Despite Pentagon statements that it disbanded a once-covert program to investigate unidentified flying objects, the effort remains underway — renamed and tucked inside the Office of Naval Intelligence, where officials continue to study mystifying encounters between military pilots and unidentified aerial vehicles.

Pentagon officials will not discuss the program, which is not classified but deals with classified matters. Yet it appeared last month in a Senate committee report outlining spending on the nation’s intelligence agencies for the coming year. The report said the program, the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force, was “to standardize collection and reporting” on sightings of unexplained aerial vehicles, and was to report at least some of its findings to the public every six months.

While retired officials involved with the effort — including Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader — hope the program will seek evidence of vehicles from other worlds, its main focus is on discovering whether another nation, especially any potential adversary, is using breakout aviation technology that could threaten the United States.

Senator Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican who is the acting chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told a CBS affiliate in Miami this month that he was primarily concerned about reports of unidentified aircraft over American military bases — and that it was in the government’s interest to find out who was responsible.

He expressed concerns that China or Russia or some other adversary had made “some technological leap” that “allows them to conduct this sort of activity.”

Mr. Rubio said some of the unidentified aerial vehicles over U.S. bases possibly exhibited technologies not in the American arsenal. But he also noted: “Maybe there is a completely, sort of, boring explanation for it. But we need to find out.”

In 2017, The New York Times disclosed the existence of a predecessor unit, called the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Defense Department officials said at the time that the unit and its $22 million in funding had lapsed after 2012.

People working with the program, however, said it was still in operation in 2017 and beyond, statements later confirmed by the Defense Department.

The program was begun in 2007 under the Defense Intelligence Agency and was then placed within the office of the undersecretary of defense for intelligence, which remains responsible for its oversight. But its coordination with the intelligence community will be carried out by the Office of Naval Intelligence, as described in the Senate budget bill. The program never lapsed in those years, but little was disclosed about the post-2017 operations.

The Pentagon program’s previous director, Luis Elizondo, a former military intelligence official who resigned in October 2017 after 10 years with the program, confirmed that the new task force evolved from the advanced aerospace program.

“It no longer has to hide in the shadows,” Mr. Elizondo said. “It will have a new transparency.”

Mr. Elizondo is among a small group of former government officials and scientists with security clearances who, without presenting physical proof, say they are convinced that objects of undetermined origin have crashed on earth with materials retrieved for study.

For more than a decade, the Pentagon program has been conducting classified briefings for congressional committees, aerospace company executives and other government officials, according to interviews with program participants and unclassified briefing documents.

In some cases, earthly explanations have been found for previously unexplained incidents. Even lacking a plausible terrestrial explanation does not make an extraterrestrial one the most likely, astrophysicists say.

Mr. Reid, the former Democratic senator from Nevada who pushed for funding the earlier U.F.O. program when he was the majority leader, said he believed that crashes of vehicles from other worlds had occurred and that retrieved materials had been studied secretly for decades, :partay: often by aerospace companies under government contracts.

“After looking into this, I came to the conclusion that there were reports — some were substantive, some not so substantive — that there were actual materials that the government and the private sector had in their possession,” Mr. Reid said in an interview.

No crash artifacts have been publicly produced for independent verification. Some retrieved objects, such as unusual metallic fragments, were later identified from laboratory studies as man-made.

Eric W. Davis, an astrophysicist who worked as a subcontractor and then a consultant for the Pentagon U.F.O. program since 2007, said that, in some cases, examination of the materials had so far failed to determine their source and led him to conclude, “We couldn’t make it ourselves.”

The constraints on discussing classified programs — and the ambiguity of information cited in unclassified slides from the briefings — have put officials who have studied U.F.O.s in the position of stating their views without presenting any hard evidence.

Mr. Davis, who now works for Aerospace Corporation, a defense contractor, said he gave a classified briefing to a Defense Department agency as recently as March about retrievals from “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”

Mr. Davis said he also gave classified briefings on retrievals of unexplained objects to staff members of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Oct. 21, 2019, and to staff members of the Senate Intelligence Committee two days later.

Committee staff members did not respond to requests for comment on the issue.

Public fascination with the topic of U.F.O.s has drawn in President Trump, who told his son Donald Trump Jr. in a June interview that he knew “very interesting” things about Roswell — a city in New Mexico that is central to speculation about the existence of U.F.O.s. The president demurred when asked if he would declassify any information on Roswell. “I’ll have to think about that one,” he said.

Either way, Mr. Reid said, more should be made public to clarify what is known and what is not. “It is extremely important that information about the discovery of physical materials or retrieved craft come out,” he said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/us/politics/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.html
 
In the darkest days of the cold war, the military lied to the American public about the true nature of many unidentified flying objects to hide its growing fleets of spy planes.
There are two schools of thought in American society on the nature of such a cover-up. One, from aerospace experts, holds that many sightings over the decades involved secret Federal projects featuring advanced aircraft and reconnaissance missions.
The other school holds that the Government has come into possession of extraterrestrial craft and beings and is hiding them from the public, partly to avoid causing panic.
The deceptions about the spy flights were issued in some of the tensest days of the cold war. The Soviet Union exploded its first hydrogen bomb in 1955, the year that the U-2 flew for the first time.
In 1960, a U-2 was shot down over the Soviet Union, leading to the cancellation of an East-West peace conference. In 1962, a U-2 spotted a buildup of Soviet nuclear arms in Cuba, precipitating the diplomatic crisis regarded by some experts as the closest the superpowers came to nuclear war.
To make the spy planes harder to see and less likely to prompt U.F.O. Reports, they were eventually painted black. The C.I.A. study said U-2's initially had silver bodies ''and reflected the sun's rays, especially at sunrise and sunset.''
We also know by the famous hoax of that time the Appollo mission on the moon. Moon-hoax theories tend to be about what didn’t happen rather than what did. In modern days the famous question to Nasa Scientist "We can put a man on the moon so why can’t we do X?
American can set itself an extraordinary goal and go on to achieve it, but that doesn’t mean it can win the war in Vietnam or Afghanistan, or clean up the inner cities, or cure cancer or COVID-19 any of the things that Americans might have actually wanted more. The idea that the American isn’t really powerful, it just pretends it is – you can see how it feeds into the moon hoax from Hollywood Movies. Indians also follow too Bollywood movies the same as Americans do and we saw the Indian real image on 27 Feb 2019 or Laddak face-off stand with china 2020.
 
Last edited:
Who knows for how long the backers of new world order have been amassing what kind of weapons in space. Could be that the disclosure will come in the form staged extraterrestrial attack to help establish one world government.
 
Who knows for how long the backers of new world order have been amassing what kind of weapons in space. Could be that the disclosure will come in the form staged extraterrestrial attack to help establish one world government.

Nice fantasy.

New world disorder is what we have and what we will have.

I dont know why so many people talk about "New world order" as something evil and fearful :lol:.

And about the thread topic, fake news about ufos is something so useful to military (to disguise airplanes, etc..), that I dont think they will stop of use it. Moreover, always there will be people that want to believe in those things, and when a large amount of people want to believe in some fantasy (ufos, gods, etc..) they create of some or another way.

e.g: fireball lighting is something real, but a strange phenomena, and if you try to search videos about it, you will find only a few. Because there are no people who want to believe in them.
Extraterrestrial ufos is fantasy, but a large amount of people want to believe in those things, so if u search about that, u will find a lot of fake videos.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom