What's new

Nuclear weapons: India keeps pace with Pakistan, but focuses on China

anant_s

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
92
Country
India
Location
India
WASHINGTON: China, India, and Pakistan all added 10 to 20 nuclear weapons to their arsenal last year even as the top four nuclear nations -- US, Russia, UK and France -- appear determined to retain their nuclear arsenals indefinitely even if they didn't add to their inventory, the Swedish arms watchdog Sipri said in its 2013 handbook released this weekend.

Sipri's world nuclear forces chart showed India bumping up its nuclear warheads from 80-100 in 2012 to 90-110 in 2013, keeping pace with Pakistan, which went from 90-110 weapons to 110-120. China meantime went from 240 nuclear weapons in 2012 to 250 in 2013, while France and UK froze their arsenals at 300 and 225 weapons respectively, as did Israel at 80 weapons.

Russia and the USA were the only two countries reducing their inventories of strategic nuclear weapons under the terms of the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (New START) as well as retiring ageing and obsolescent weapons. However, Sipri said, they, along with the three other recognized nuclear powers, France, Britain and China, are either deploying new nuclear weapon delivery systems or have announced programs to do so, and appear determined to retain their nuclear arsenals indefinitely.

As a result, although the total number of nuclear weapons in the world dropped from approximately 19000 in 2012 to 17265 in 2013, there was little to inspire hope that the nuclear weapon-possessing states are genuinely willing to give up their nuclear arsenals, the Sipri report said.

''The long-term modernization programs under way in these states suggest that nuclear weapons are still a marker of international status and power,'' said Sipri senior researcher Shannon Kile.

While Sipri did not cite sources for its data, it is ranked as one of the top think tanks in the world and is widely respected for its research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Its analysis is the first time nuclear pundits have suggested India is now keeping pace with Pakistan in terms of ramping up its nuclear arsenal.

With greater insecurities and fears of survival, Pakistan is long thought to possess more nukes than India (because it has to target a larger landmass and greater number of cities of its perceived enemy), although recent suggestions that it has or will overtake the weapons count of Britain and France seems misplaced. India, on the other hand, appears to be ramping up its arsenal with China in its calculations since Pakistan is a smaller land mass has only a few targets.

''With India we see the gradual expansion of its longer-range ballistic missile capabilities which are not really targeted at Pakistan but rather at China,'' Kile said.

The Sipri report said the eight nuclear states possessed approximately 4400 operational nuclear weapons at the start of 2013 of which nearly 2000 are kept in a state of high operational alert. All the deployments -- warheads placed on missiles or located on bases with operational forces -- came from US, Russia, France and UK. It did not count North Korea in the list although Pyongyang was said to have as many as eight warheads with an uncertain operational status.

Nuclear weapons: India keeps pace with Pakistan, but focuses on China - The Times of India

Nuclear_Armed_Nations_2011-SIPRI-ICANW.jpg


SIPRI97AlBeWaC.gif
 
Hmm we posses more plutonium weapons than pakistan acc to this article then?Uranium based weapons can't be used on missiles anyway.
 
This study suggests India has less number of nuke weapons than pak..... But spend more than double that of pakistan..... I wonder why????.... Can anyone shed lights to this????
 
we poses warheads with yeilds 0.2kt to 250-300kt or even more....further miniaturisation are being done...i have heard that we have successfully miniaturised warhead yeild 250kt for weight not more than 450kg.
 
This study suggests India has less number of nuke weapons than pak..... But spend more than double that of pakistan..... I wonder why????.... Can anyone shed lights to this????

I was thinking the same. Does that mean Pakistan making them cheaper?

How much a nuke warhead costs anyway? lol
 
I was thinking the same. Does that mean Pakistan making them cheaper?

How much a nuke warhead costs anyway? lol
no india is bigger land mass and in a nuclear conflict whole india wiill get blanckted hence the numbers adantage
 
I was thinking the same. Does that mean Pakistan making them cheaper?

How much a nuke warhead costs anyway? lol

May be we spend more on research.... Or may be the study itself is based on wrong inputs.... No way one can verify these claims so everyone has to depend on different studies and assumptions or make own assumptions....
 
How did they come up with these figures ? :what:

Especially the expenditure ones down to them being rounded to the last 100 million ? :undecided:
 
May be we spend more on research.... Or may be the study itself is based on wrong inputs.... No way one can verify these claims so everyone has to depend on different studies and assumptions or make own assumptions....

Can't even file an RTI for that. National Security matter hmmm?
 
Well I always believed 20 odd nuclear weapons are enough for any country, what's the point in stockpiling 11,000 and 8,000 weapons what the hell are they gonna do with so many of them? I hope not use them
 
Well I always believed 20 odd nuclear weapons are enough for any country, what's is the point in stockpiling 11,000 and 8,000 weapons what the hell are they gonna do with so many of them? I hope not use them

well,that was cold war mentality..in country like India,round 100 nukes are more than enough to counter any threat.but I think as new delivery platforms are coming up,India is presently increasing its miniatured nukes and it'll increase the number before it'll retire older and heavier nukes.
 

Back
Top Bottom