What's new

Pakistan addicted to using militants against India: Pentagon

The same rhetoric that has yet to be justified where as Indian support for Mukti Bahini, LTTE and Northern Alliance is a known fact. The Americans are split into very distinct pro-India and pro-Pakistan lobbies. However, after the recent turn of events, the latter has been losing. These are excuses for covering up American failures in Afghanistan because international media stands witness that the TTP phenomenon in FATA has been pacified.
 
Considered by whom? Is the judiciary able to restrain the army that is the sponsor of these terrorist policies?
Your judiciary goes around catching terrorists?

Your statement itself is faulty, when did we establish army is the sponsor of terrorists?

That's the problem with you guys, no respect for the law, you talk as if you have a problem with terrorists, but are the biggest terror sponsors when you throw rule of law out the window.

If you advocate killing of people through drones without due process and trial then there is no difference in justification of those people going to Mumbai and killing people as they deemed them unfit to live.

Your opening the window towards actions like throwing due process out for one set of people will leave terrorism as the only logical recourse - if the grand scheme of things were anything to go by, with this statement alone, you should be questioned why did you part-take in the killing of 170 people in Mumbai?

But of course, you never think in those terms - in fact you just never think.
 
Keeping snakes in the backyards with the hope that they are going to bite neighbors only is a fatal idea pakistanis still pursues in spite of so much blood shed within its borders due to its long policy of supporting terrorists .

I say carry on with the policy for our sake as you are only going to end up destroying yourselves .
 
Your judiciary goes around catching terrorists?
Is that the excuse you guys are going to go with. Are you pleading incompetence on us. Well then he is right. Drone strikes must be allowed, considering the fact that nothing else seems to work.
 
you even even if their is proof then even you denied it one pretext or another, remember you people even denied that OBL is done NYC attack even after he said in video still you claimed that is doctorates.

OBL existence in ISI safe house in Near PAK military camp is itself is proof.

You have to first show proof, then talk, einstein.

And no, what you mentioned is not evidence..

So the ultimate question - is there any solid evidence to support this claim?
 
Keeping snakes in the backyards with the hope that they are going to bite neighbors only is a fatal idea pakistanis still pursues in spite of so much blood shed within its borders due to its long policy of supporting terrorists .

I say carry on with the policy for our sake as you are only going to end up destroying yourselves .


Source? Proof? Pictures?
 
Judging from the expectations people have with Pakistan reigning in on terrorists, it seems like everybody else thinks Pakistan is some sort of old western flick where the sheriff just goes around shooting people.

We are struggling so hard to enforce rule of law, and then here we have people passing off such absolute statements who work for the Pentagon and then giving press briefings about their statements which have no basis in established fact.
 
Is that the excuse you guys are going to go with. Are you pleading incompetence on us. Well then he is right. Drone strikes must be allowed, considering the fact that nothing else seems to work.

No I mean, is it the job of your judiciary to go around catching people?

No, as far as my understanding of this world goes that the judicial branch of the government tries people on charges of terrorism and if found guilty instructs the institutions operating under the executive branch of the government to jail them.

Now the question of incompetence of our judiciary or yours comes into play when a decision has been made contrary to the evidence presented in court.

So what damning evidence did you or the Pentagon presented in court that can be used to qualify the statement of our judiciary's incompetence?
 
Judging from the expectations people have with Pakistan reigning in on terrorists, it seems like everybody else thinks Pakistan is some sort of old western flick where the sheriff just goes around shooting people.

We are struggling so hard to enforce rule of law, and then here we have people passing off such absolute statements who work for the Pentagon and then giving press briefings about their statements which have no basis in established fact.

Yaa ,you guys have running with hares and hunting with hounds proverbially speaking.You know the end result of it.
 
Don't you read your newspaper ??

Defence.pk is a media website, if I declare tomorrow that Manas is a terrorist, should someone come and shoot you?

If India is half a constitutional country it will follow the norm of every man is innocent until proven guilty in the court of law. You will be tried, evidence will be presented against you and then either a judge, a panel of judges or a competent jury will find you guilty or not guilty and then your sentencing will be carried out.

That is the process in Pakistan. Have you done that before making such statements?

Yaa ,you guys have running with hares and hunting with hounds proverbially speaking.You know the end result of it.

Head - bang - wall.

Does that demand that we throw out "Innocent until proven guilty" ?
 

Back
Top Bottom