What's new

Second US drone shot down

lyns

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
GEO Pakistan
Tribesmen shot down another US drone
Updated at: 2330 PST, Tuesday, January 26, 2010
MIRANSHAH: The tribesman on Tuesday shot down another US unmanned spy plane through anti-aircraft gun in North Waziristan region.

According to sources, four US drone aircrafts were hovering over different parts of Waziristan when the tribesmen shot fire at them with anti-aircraft gun. As a result one of the aircrafts crashed in Miranshah area.

According to an eyewitness, the plane’s wreckage fell into Afghanistan’s area.

This was the second drone plane, which was shot down by tribesmen this week.

Tribesmen shot down another US drone - GEO.tv
***************
-
Who are giving them technology. Pak army!!!?
 
^^ I don't believe it until I read it from more accurate sources.

These Talibans are so stupid that if they shoot down a kite they will call it a drone.
 
^^ I don't believe it until I read it from more accurate sources.

These Talibans are so stupid that if they shoot down a kite they will call it a drone.
Yeh, but they will not fly and shoot down their own kite just to make a claim. If they did shoot down a kite, it either belonged to the Afghan National Army, or the occupation forces or Pakistan.
 
These Talibans are so stupid that if they shoot down a kite they will call it a drone

How do you know?

If these Talibans can make bombs and kill hundreds of innocent civilans, 1500+ of our armymen, then i wouldn't be surprised if they shoot down few US drones.

I wouldn't call them stupid.....wonder how you can?
 
Some thing doesnt sound quite right about the story, 4 or 5 drones in the area the number differs according to the source one crashes and the guys who claim they shot it down are standing arround celebrating and telling people about it?

Now the remaining up to 4 drones gives you 16 hellfires and 8 500pd bombs what they just keep flying racetracks while the guys that shot the first drone down hold a party?

Common sense would seem that i shoot down one of five US drones i either keep shooting at the other 4 or i run like hell before they retaliate.
 
Some thing doesnt sound quite right about the story, 4 or 5 drones in the area the number differs according to the source one crashes and the guys who claim they shot it down are standing arround celebrating and telling people about it?

Now the remaining up to 4 drones gives you 16 hellfires and 8 500pd bombs what they just keep flying racetracks while the guys that shot the first drone down hold a party?

Common sense would seem that i shoot down one of five US drones i either keep shooting at the other 4 or i run like hell before they retaliate.
Or maybe the other 4 drones ran like hell before they were also going to meet the same fate as the one of their buddy. These slow moving drones are indeed very vulnerable at low altitudes. They are good as long as they catch their prey by surprise, especially when the prey is unarmed or getting ready to go through the funeral proceedings.
 
The Iraqi militants 'hacked' the drones didnt they?
No. They downloaded a pirated copy of an commercial program that taps into video feeds. Those drones were not using video encryptions. It was a shot in the dark, and the Iraqi militia got lucky. Technically, you're right, that's still a 'hack'; but not one that required much knowleldge of computers.

The drones flying in Afghanistan and Pakistan are encrypted. Unlike those militants, the Pakistan Army is quite sophisticated.

Common sense would seem that i shoot down one of five US drones i either keep shooting at the other 4 or i run like hell before they retaliate.
Maybe that's what they did. Ran like hell, then claimed it some time later.

It does seem fishy though, two drones shot down in less than a week. Is it normal for UCAVs to fly in formations of up to 4?

Just as a side note. There was a time during the Soviet-Afghan war when Soviet helicopters began coming down mysteriously. The Mujahideen had just received RPGs.

Or maybe the other 4 drones ran like hell before they were also going to meet the same fate as the one of their buddy.
I don't see why the drones would run like hell, they could just climb out of reach if they were flying low. Not unless it was more than just a lucky shot that brought the first two down.
 
Last edited:
Tribesmen shot down another US drone
Updated at: 2325 PST, Tuesday, January 26, 2010


MIRANSHAH: The tribesman on Tuesday shot down another US unmanned spy plane through anti-aircraft gun in North Waziristan region.

According to sources, four US drone aircrafts were hovering over different parts of Waziristan when the tribesmen shot fire at them with anti-aircraft gun. As a result one of the aircrafts crashed in Miranshah area.

According to an eyewitness, the plane’s wreckage fell into Afghanistan’s area.

This was the second drone plane, which was shot down by tribesmen this week.

Tribesmen shot down another US drone
 
Perhaps Tribesman/Taliban/Alqaeda are taking credit for someone elses hard work.
 
I won't take it at face value. Tribesmen do not have sophisticated enough weapons to see the drones, yet alone shoot them down.
 
Technically it is not possible to target drone flying at 30000 or 20000ft with anti aircraft gun .There is possibility they got stinger type missile from Iran or China:azn:

Taliban in first heat-seeking missile attack

telegraph.co.uk

Taliban militants have used a heat-seeking surface-to-air missile to attack a Western aircraft over Afghanistan for the first time.

The attack with a weapon believed to have been smuggled across the border with Iran represents a worrying increase in the capability of the militants which Western commanders had long feared.

The Daily Telegraph has learnt that the Taliban attempted to bring down an American C-130 Hercules aircraft flying over the south-western province of Nimroz on July 22. The crew reported that a missile system locked on to their aircraft and that a missile was fired.

It closed in on the large C-130 aircraft, pursuing it as the pilots launched a series of violent evasive manoeuvres and jettisoned flares to confuse the heat sensors in the nose of the missile. Crew members said that they saw what they believe was a missile passing very close to the aircraft. The C-130 was not damaged in the attack.

"If there was such an incident of the type you describe in Nimroz it is classified," said a Nato spokesman. "I can't release it, if in fact it did occur."
However, a surface-to-air missile alert was put out for Western aircraft travelling in the south-west of Afghanistan in the last week, which affected both civilian and military aircraft.

It was confirmed by civilian air operators in Helmand province. It remains in place. Western military commanders have been aware of concerted efforts by the Taliban to obtain shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles, so-called Manpads (man portable air defence system).

The recent attack was probably with an SA7 shoulder-launched missile, an elderly model of Soviet or Chinese origin. Though relatively primitive they are still a potent weapon, particularly against low-flying helicopters, such as the workhorse Chinook transporters used by British forces in the southern Helmand province.

The C-130 attacked in Nimroz was flying at 11,000ft at the time of the attack, which is within the 2.5-5 km range of a shoulder-launched missile system such as the SA7.

Though the West supplied hundreds of sophisticated Stinger heat-seeking missiles to the Afghan Mujaheddin in the 1980s, they are not thought to be still usable because of the deterioration of their sophisticated electronics and battery systems.

As a contingency in 2002, the United States government offered an amnesty on Stingers and successfully bought back many of the missiles still in the arsenals of Afghan warlords for $40,000 a missile.

To date, the Taliban has shot down a number of Western helicopters, but only through the use of unguided rocket-propelled grenades, which have a range of only 500 yards.

In April members of the Special Boat Service operating in Nimroz province intercepted several truck loads of weapons coming across the Iranian border, including a working SA7 missile. It was one of a number of recent weapon caches that Western officials claim have been seized on the border with Iran, fuelling allegations by Britain and America that Iran, or elements within the Iranian government, have begun supplying arms to the Taliban.

Hundreds of SA7 missiles disappeared into the black market in Iraq in the aftermath of the fall of Saddam Hussein, where they have since been used to shoot down dozens of helicopters and aircraft, reportedly including a British C-130 in 2005.

Meanwhile, a Taliban spokesman said that the group would allow more time for an envoy from Seoul to travel to join talks for the release of 22 South Korean hostages. But the spokesman repeated the threat that militants would kill the 22 Christian missionaries.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The geo was also showing some video of drone shot down. (Not the animated one)
 

Back
Top Bottom