What's new

Shaurya surfaces as India's underwater nuclear missile

chantpapipart2

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
The country’s top defence scientist has, for the first time, revealed that India’s new Shaurya missile, which can carry a one-tonne nuclear warhead over 750 kilometers, is specially designed to be fired from Indian submarines and could form the crucial third leg of India’s nuclear deterrent.

If launched from a submarine off the China coast, it could hit several Chinese cities like Beijing, Nanjing and Shanghai.

Air and land-based nuclear weapons are delivered to their targets by fighter aircraft and ballistic missiles, respectively. Since these can be knocked out by an enemy first strike, the most reliable nuclear deterrent has traditionally been underwater, missiles hidden in a submarine.

V K Saraswat, the DRDO chief and Scientific Advisor to the Defence Minister, revealed to Business Standard at the ongoing Defexpo 2010, “We have designed the Shaurya so that it can be launched from under water as easily as from land. The gas-filled canister that houses the missile fits easily into a submarine. The underwater leg of the nuclear triad needs to be totally reliable and needs a state-of-the-art missile.”

India’s undersea deterrent had so far revolved around the K-15 ballistic missile, built with significant help from Russia. The K-15 was to equip the INS Arihant, India’s lone nuclear-powered submarine, which is being constructed in Visakhapatnam. But now, after rigorous underwater testing, the Shaurya could be the mainstay of Arihant’s arsenal.

“The Shaurya was developed from ground up as a submarine-capable missile,” confirms Dr Prahlada, the top DRDO scientist responsible for liaising with the military. “Every piece of technology for fitting it in a submarine is already in place.”

Shortly before the Defexpo 2010, Dr Saraswat had publicly stated that India’s missile technology was ahead of China’s and Pakistan’s.

Now top DRDO scientists have revealed that the Shaurya is not a ballistic missile, as it has been thought to be; it is actually a hypersonic cruise missile, which never leaves the atmosphere.

A ballistic missile is like a stone being lobbed towards a target. Rockets toss it upwards and towards the target; after the rocket burns out, gravity pulls the missile warhead down towards the target. Buffeted by wind and re-entry forces, accuracy is a problem; and, since the ballistic missile’s path is predictable, shooting it down is relatively easy.

The Shaurya has none of these issues. Its solid-fuel, two-stage rocket accelerates the missile to six times the speed of sound before it reaches an altitude of 40 kilometers (125,000 feet), after which it levels out and cruises towards the target, powered by its onboard fuel.

While ballistic missiles cannot correct their course midway, the Shaurya is an intelligent missile. Onboard navigation computers kick in near the target, guiding the missile to the target and eliminating errors that inevitably creep in during its turbulent journey.

The Shaurya, say DRDO sources, will strike within 20-30 metres of its target after travelling 750 kilometres.

Conventional cruise missiles, like the American Tomahawk and the Indo-Russian Brahmos, offer similar accuracy. But their air-breathing engines carry them along slowly, rendering them vulnerable to enemy aircraft and missiles. The Shaurya’s solid-fuel, air-independent engine propels it along at hypersonic speeds, leaving enemy fighters and missiles far behind.

“I would say the Shaurya is a hybrid propulsion missile”, says Dr Saraswat. “Like a ballistic missile, it is powered by solid fuel. And, like a cruise missile, it can guide itself right up to the target.”

Making the Shaurya even more capable is its ability to manoeuvre, following a twisting path to the target that makes it very difficult to shoot it down. In contrast, a ballistic missile is predictable; its trajectory gives away its target and its path to it.

Shaurya surfaces as India's underwater nuclear missile
 
I do not think this is the appropriate forum to post.
 
Thats great news, i always liked shaurya better than k15 shaurya has a magnificent way of launching....
 
Can anyone tale me difference in Shaurya and K-15 missile?

As i know Shaurya is nothing but just a long range BrahMos, as technically Russia can't transfer long range missile tech to India... So this is What they came up with.

I always wander how come suddenly after BrahMos, all Indian missile tests are successful, range and speed are up.
 
@lilaspr

Well both are different. K-15 is a ballistic missile whereas Shaurya is cruise one.

Top Russian news and analysis online | 'RIA Novosti' newswire

According to Indian media reports, although there was speculation that the missile was a land version of the K-15 submarine-launched ballistic missile, which is still in development, DRDO sources were quoted as saying the Shaurya is unrelated to the K-15 Sagarika project.

Shaurya surfaces as India's underwater nuclear missile - 1 -  National News ? News ? MSN India

Now top DRDO scientists have revealed that the Shaurya is not a ballistic missile, as it has been thought to be; it is actually a hypersonic cruise missile, which never leaves the atmosphere.
 
Well i doubt it .
There must be some misinformation going on in press.
Shaurya was designed and build as A LAND LAUNCHED BALLESTIC missile of 700kms range.
While Nirbhay was to be A SUBSONIC CRUISE MISSILE of 700 kms range & comparable to tomhawk/babur.
There is similarity between Shaurya and Sagrika(K15) , since both are launched from gaseous canesterised chamber with same range and accuracy.

So there is no point for DRDO to go ahead with subsonic nirbhay cruise misssile when, another cruise missile which is way ahead already is devloped. That just explains the whole thing
And as speculated by some Shaurya is extended Brahmos - that for me is just guesswork, see you cant modify a product of JV alone it is just like breaking a copyright issue.

Building a supersonic cruise missile with pinpoint accuracy and extended range is not easy, even US and Russia are in stages of devloping these missiles and upgrading them regularly to get specs of shaurya .
So i think it is not correct data posted abt Shaurya

AND YES...... THIS IS MY FIRST POST - HELLO TO ALL
I AM LT.PRATEEK , I SERVE IN INDIAN ARMY AS AN DOCTOR IN AMC
(MEDICAL CORE OF ARMED FORCES , CURRENTLY I AM IN COMMAND HOSPITAL PUNE)
 
welcome prateek..u can make i introduction thread in member intro zone..and tell more abt urself and ur job
 
Can anyone tale me difference in Shaurya and K-15 missile?

As i know Shaurya is nothing but just a long range BrahMos, as technically Russia can't transfer long range missile tech to India... So this is What they came up with.

I always wander how come suddenly after BrahMos, all Indian missile tests are successful, range and speed are up.

Shourya is the land version of K-15 missile (also called Sagarika). Sagarika's development started way back in 1991 and Shourya's development started in 2004 (it was being concealed at that time).

http://www.indiaresearch.org/Shourya_Missile.pdf

So yes, Shourya and Brahmos are different missiles.
 
Last edited:
@ Defexpo i have talked with DRDO guys about Shaurya Missile.

They are saying:

1. Shaurya a hypersonic cruise missile will have 2 tests in this year and after it will be ready for induction.

2. Shaurya is 100% Indian.

3. Shaurya is unpredictable and its very difficult for enemy to counter it. Since, it's not like cruise missile or ballistic missile and its mix of both. It will zik zak, dive and bang on target.

3. They want to build Shaurya as a alternative to Agni.

4. Now, they want to increase Shaurya's range to 5000 kms.
 
Well its simply not possible.
Since only now our missile tech is coming up
And expecting hypersonic cruise missile with long range , is just to much to ask at this stage.
Search through google and wiki it shows "There is no functional hypersonic cruise missile at this stage"
Only one in line is Brahmos2 and C807 from china , and those two also in Lab testing phase.
Secondly if india is in that advanced stage , i doubt then why they have NIRBHAY a subsonic cruise missile devlopment going on now.
Even US does not have supersonic cruise missile with 1000+ range forget hypersonic

And ballistic missile has its advantages - Range is one and other thing is its difficult to intercept them bcoz they require propulsion only during altitude phase unlike cruise missile which require consistent air breathing motors for full path so its easy to shoot them via short ranged SAM's like AKASH/BARAK .
While ballistic defence revolves around 3 phase interception with long range sophisticated system
Exoatmosphere- needs long range like PAD/PATRIOT/ARROW/S400-500
Endoatmosphere-needs another sophisticated missile like AAD/ABM2/AGEIS
Today work is going on to add third phase that is launch altitude interception.
 
Last edited:
Well its simply not possible.
Since only now our missile tech is coming up
And expecting hypersonic cruise missile with long range , is just to much to ask at this stage.
Search through google and wiki it shows "There is no functional hypersonic cruise missile at this stage"
Only one in line is Brahmos2 and C807 from china , and those two also in Lab testing phase.
Secondly if india is in that advanced stage , i doubt then why they have NIRBHAY a subsonic cruise missile devlopment going on now.
Even US does not have supersonic cruise missile with 1000+ range forget hypersonic

And ballistic missile has its advantages - Range is one and other thing is its difficult to intercept them bcoz they require propulsion only during altitude phase unlike cruise missile which require consistent air breathing motors for full path so its easy to shoot them via short ranged SAM's like AKASH/BARAK .
While ballistic defence revolves around 3 phase interception with long range sophisticated system
Exoatmosphere- needs long range like PAD/PATRIOT/ARROW/S400-500
Endoatmosphere-needs another sophisticated missile like AAD/ABM2/AGEIS
Today work is going on to add third phase that is launch altitude interception.

First of all welcome to the Defence.pk

1. Shaurya is hypersonic missile.

2. Shaurya is hybrid of both cruise and basaltic missile. As at the Defexpo they have shown us the tragedy. It is mixture of both. So one can not clearly define what Shaurya is?

3. But we can safely say that it is the missile with unique mix or a new catagory of missile.

4. The cost they says is around 12 crore including everything.

5. The Nirbhay is on paper only and we are making Nirbay for:

a. Low cost option with large number of production and deployment.

b. To have different options so that enemy is confused and can't defend them.

6. And about the ballistic missile we are not going to phaseout Agni but they are saying they are building Shaurya with long range because:

a. It will give option to us and surprise to enemy.

b. Difficult to track and destroy because of its unpredictable path.

Shaurya does not follow any proven trajectory like

Cruise missile: A guided missile, the major portion of whose flight path to its target is conducted at an approximately constant velocity. It depends on the dynamic reaction of air for lift and upon propulsion forces (usually a jet engine) to balance drag.

Ballistic missile: which follows a ballistic trajectory.

Shaurya Missile flies to its target with mix of both straight at an approximately constant velocity and suddenly dives and comes up. It is some new kind of missile.

Yaar don't give USA don't have kind of argument.

USA is the most advanced space power yet India have found water on Moon not USA.

Hillary Clinton have said in India you guys use electronic voting machines and in US we still uses ballot paper, so India is advance than US in that.
 
kya baat hai bhai log..
yeh achchha thread ban raha hai....aur to har jagah gandagi bhari padi hai....

carry on the discussion... hopefully i will also join it with my bit...

aur haan lieutenant sahib...SHUBH SWAGATAM
 
Also, Shaurya guys are saying that they are in competition with Brahmos/Agni which is of different group and as competition always brings good result. I hope they come true to their words. And provide us some mean toys.
 
this 5000 km. range is a little too much ...dont you think...we dont even have a BM in that range...if this is true then DRDO rocks..
 

Back
Top Bottom