Baghial
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Messages
- 5,739
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
file no longer available ... if possible reattach the link to the report ....
file no longer available ... if possible reattach the link to the report ....
I think he has removed it from iCloud ....Download Attachment
Available until 20-Jun-2020
Click to DownloadSugar Inquiry Commission Report (signed 347 pages).pdf
0 bytes
——
https://nadeemmalik.wordpress.com/2020/05/21/sugar-inquiry-commission-report-may-2020/
Sales transactions From October, Z017 to February, 2020. 363. Most of the sale transactions are conducted in the names of persons who are unregistered in sales tax. Largely the particulars like CNIC numbers and addresses of such unregistered persons are not maintained or made available to the tax authorities by the sugar Mills. Benaaml sales transactions are mostly conducted in the garb of such unregistered persons. The enormity of sales transactions declared and unregistered person involved can be ascertained from the following data declared to FBR during October, 2017 to February, 2020 by six (6) sugar mills under forensic audit:
Approximately 71% of total sales, from October, 2017 to February, 2020, have been declared to be made to unregistered buyers. A comparison of particulars of the buyers as appearing in sale data of the Company with the declared buyers as appearing in Annexure-C of the sale tax returns of the Company was made. It was found that, during the period October 2019 —January 2020, both data do not match with each other. This aspect of maintaining different records for the same transactions alone, makes all such transactions suspected to be benami. Analysis of the sales data (REPORT NO. SALES-102 - Consolidated Sugar Sales Statement) of Unit-II of the Company for the year 2019-2020 transpired that during the period November 27, 2019 and March 17, 2020, Unit II has sold a total of 1,741,880 bags (SO Kgs) of sugar aggregating to Rs. 5,831,171,000. It has been observed that for every sale transaction, a Delivery Order (DO) is issued to one person and another person is recorded as a dealer for the said sale. However, when the team extracted a separate report (REPORT NO. SALES-052 - DAILY SUGAR DESPATCH REPORT) the persons mentioned as "Customer" have been found to be mentioned as "Brokers" therein. In order to clarify the discrepancy, the team investigated GM Sales of the Company, who conceded that most of these are "made up" names. As per the provisions of BTPA, 2017 booking of sales In made up names/fictitious names constitute benami sale transactions. He shared a list of actual brokers and the benami / fictitious names being used against those brokers
Forensic audit shows that mostly the benami sales transactions are recorded against unregistered persons. Out of total sales of MW Company of around Rs. 100 billion "sale of around Rs. 71.8 billion is suspected to be benami transactions" during the period from October, 2017 to February, 2020.
Sales transactions From October, Z017 to February, 2020. 363. Most of the sale transactions are conducted in the names of persons who are unregistered in sales tax. Largely the particulars like CNIC numbers and addresses of such unregistered persons are not maintained or made available to the tax authorities by the sugar Mills. Benaaml sales transactions are mostly conducted in the garb of such unregistered persons. The enormity of sales transactions declared and unregistered person involved can be ascertained from the following data declared to FBR during October, 2017 to February, 2020 by six (6) sugar mills under forensic audit:
Approximately 71% of total sales, from October, 2017 to February, 2020, have been declared to be made to unregistered buyers. A comparison of particulars of the buyers as appearing in sale data of the Company with the declared buyers as appearing in Annexure-C of the sale tax returns of the Company was made. It was found that, during the period October 2019 —January 2020, both data do not match with each other. This aspect of maintaining different records for the same transactions alone, makes all such transactions suspected to be benami. Analysis of the sales data (REPORT NO. SALES-102 - Consolidated Sugar Sales Statement) of Unit-II of the Company for the year 2019-2020 transpired that during the period November 27, 2019 and March 17, 2020, Unit II has sold a total of 1,741,880 bags (SO Kgs) of sugar aggregating to Rs. 5,831,171,000. It has been observed that for every sale transaction, a Delivery Order (DO) is issued to one person and another person is recorded as a dealer for the said sale. However, when the team extracted a separate report (REPORT NO. SALES-052 - DAILY SUGAR DESPATCH REPORT) the persons mentioned as "Customer" have been found to be mentioned as "Brokers" therein. In order to clarify the discrepancy, the team investigated GM Sales of the Company, who conceded that most of these are "made up" names. As per the provisions of BTPA, 2017 booking of sales In made up names/fictitious names constitute benami sale transactions. He shared a list of actual brokers and the benami / fictitious names being used against those brokers
Forensic audit shows that mostly the benami sales transactions are recorded against unregistered persons. Out of total sales of MW Company of around Rs. 100 billion "sale of around Rs. 71.8 billion is suspected to be benami transactions" during the period from October, 2017 to February, 2020.
412. For the period October 2017 to February 2020 total sales of sugar In Pakistan was more than Rs. 723 billion and 71% sales (Rs. 517 billion) of all Sugar Mills are benami sales transactions against CNICs of unregistered "benamidars" mostly truck drivers, loaders, employees of the mills or dummy fictitious persons, who are unaware of such transactions booked/invoiced in their names.
I think he has removed it from iCloud ....
So biggest culprits as expected are the Sharif khandaan and Omni group. Murad Ali Shah as CM Sindh gave subsidy just for Omni group for Rs 9 billion. Kha kha ke khatum kar diya hai meray mulk ko.
Thanks to our lovely establishment all these chor are out of jail and PPP are in their 13th consecutive year in power.
So biggest culprits as expected are the Sharif khandaan and Omni group. Murad Ali Shah as CM Sindh gave subsidy just for Omni group for Rs 9 billion. Kha kha ke khatum kar diya hai meray mulk ko.
Thanks to our lovely establishment all these chor are out of jail and PPP are in their 13th consecutive year in power.
First learn to type without caps lock then expect a response. Didn't read your bull shit.NOT REALY? BECAUSE THE INQUIRY REPORT IS FROM 2018/2019
WHILE SUBSIDY IN SIND WAS NOT GIVEN IN 18/2019
THE LAST SUBSIDY WAS IN 2017......
THE INQUIRY IS SILENT ABOUT THE ROLE OF CM-PUNJAB
MORE QUESTION, THEN ANSWERS IN THIS REPORT.
WHILE SHAZAD AKBAR WAS DEFENDING KHUSROO BHAKTAIR.. IN HIS PRESS CONFRENCE, CLEARING HIM AWAY,ON ANY CONFLICT OF INTREST, BECAUSE SUGAR MILLS ARE ON NAME OF HIS BROTHER?
KHUSROO WONT BE STUPID TO BE IN GOVT AND HAVE ASSETS AKING BILLIONS OF PROFITS ON HIS NAME.
EVERY ONE THINKS AWAAM IS STUPID.
EVERY MILL WAS SELLING SUGAR TO BOGUS CLIENTS,
, TRANSPORTATION,,,,,,,, TO AFGHAN-- A TRUCK WHICH HAS MAX CAP OF 25 TONS--WAS HAULING 70 TONS ON PAPER?
IF IN ANY NEAR FUTURE AN INQUIRY IS HELD FOR IPPS POWER SECTOR,
YOU WILL FLIP OVER TO SEE PROFIT OF 80% ON 100 BILLION RPS CORRUPTION
SUGAR SCAM WILL BE LIKE PEANUTS -INFRONT OF POWER SCANDEL CORRUPTION,
BUISNESSMEN COME IN POWER TO PROTECT THERE BUISNESS ' NOT FOR THE PLEASURE OF AWAAM AND THERE PROBLEM,S.
IT HAS BEEN GOING IN 1 DIRECTION, SINCE 60'S
TAKE ANY GOT, N U WILL SEE ALL THE USUAL SYSPECTS
NOTHING HAS CHANGED EVEN IN IMRAN,S (TABDELI)
PTI. JUST WANTS TO CRUSH NAWAZ N ZARDARI,,-WHILE THE COHERTS OF THESE 2 ARE STILL HAND N HAND WITH SO CALLED IMRAN KHAN,S CHANGE,
IF IMRAN REALY WANTED A CHANGE, WELL THAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IN 1ST 90 DAYS
NOW- THE FALSE TIME PASSING SLOGEN, GIVE HIM MORE TIME'
GIVE HIM MORE TIME,
TAKE ALL THE TIME WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO U BY YOUR SELECTED MASTERS,
END WILL BE HORRIBLE FOR BOTH PARTIES, SELECTORS N SELECTED.
out of 78 sugar mills , why forensic of only 10 sugar mills,?First learn to type without caps lock then expect a response. Didn't read your bull shit.
out of 78 sugar mills , why forensic of only 10 sugar mills,?
People still bash Imran Khan ...he is doing best he can do.... Hope he will win next election...at least this is first gov whom take few steps and make it public