What's new

Time to review real effective exchange rate

ajpirzada

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
6,011
Reaction score
11
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Time to review real effective exchange rate
AHMED JAMAL PIRZADA — PUBLISHED ABOUT 18 HOURS AGO

A COUNTRY’S export competitiveness in the international market is determined by trade-weighted crucial real effective exchange rate.

REER may appreciate even when nominal exchange rate depreciates (rupee price of dollar increasing from 100 to 105, for example).

In other words, a country’s trade competitiveness may worsen even when the country’s currency has lost its nominal value.

The State Bank of Pakistan’s data show that the country’s trade-weighted nominal exchange rate (NEER) has depreciated by roughly 7pc since 2010. However, during the same period, REER has appreciated by 23pc until January 2016. The appreciation of REER has been much more pronounced over the last two years — a period which coincides with persistent decline in exports.

Exports for the first half of fiscal year FY16 have declined in dollar terms by 14.4pc on a year-on-year basis. More importantly, the balance of trade has worsened by 4.3pc.

Pakistan’s economy has been experiencing a similar trend for the last two years. While there are structural reasons such as energy crisis which have adversely affected the export growth, the recent decline can better be attributed to a loss in the price competitiveness of domestic products on the international market.

Very little attention has so far been paid to the exchange rate dynamics as a source of the exporting sector’s poor performance. The structure of economy and the composition of our export basket make it only more vulnerable to adverse movements in REER.

Very little attention has so far been paid to the exchange rate dynamics as a source of the exporting sector’s poor performance
Around 70pc of the country exports comprise of textile and food group with very little value addition. Professor Jeffrey Frankel of Harvard Kennedy School notes that countries, which export goods having only small value addition component, enjoy almost no price setting power.

Therefore, for such countries, small changes in the relative price of closely related goods produced by competing international producers can have significant implications for export demand of domestic goods. It was only natural that Pakistan’s exports would fall following an increase in REER.

At the same time REER appreciation caused an increase in the total import demand following a decline in the real price of imported goods.

The SBP data suggest that the imports of products in machinery and metals group increased sharply in dollar terms since fiscal year 2013.

Thus, despite a staggering fall in oil prices (with petroleum products accounting for 30pc of import bill), total import bill did not decline by as much as was anticipated by some analysts.

Consequently, despite the calm witnessed in the international commodity markets, our balance on goods and services has once again worsened to the level observed in FY08 — a period of skyrocketing commodity prices.

Pakistan’s REER has seen a year-on-year appreciation of 5.6pc and 8.8pc between FY14 and FY15, respectively, thus worsening the competitiveness of local products.

Bank of International Settlements has reported similar trends in REER across other emerging economies like India and China. These trends in REER are driven predominantly due to loose monetary policies (of which currency devaluation is a part) adopted by the EU and other advanced economies.

However, since the US and the EU alone constitute more than 45pc of the country’s export market, exchange rate policies in the US and the EU have significant implications for Pakistan’s export demand.

The adverse effect of the policies in the West must, therefore, be reversed. The rupee must be devalued to restore competitiveness.

Sharp devaluation can be destabilising for developing countries in an environment of increasing commodity and crude materials prices in the international market.

Since commodity and crude materials are used as inputs in firms’ production, devaluation, in an environment of increasing commodity and crude material prices, can further increase the cost of production and consequently inflation.

But today international prices of commodities and crude materials are at their lowest and expected to stay low. Devaluation, therefore, is not expected to significantly increase the input cost for domestic firms.

With inflation rate at 3.9pc and below the 6pc target set by the SBP, devaluation can even help achieve the set inflation target through both cost and demand effect.

In fact, today devaluation can also be politically beneficial. It will bring the rupee price of petroleum products back to the level where government will not have to resort to exorbitant rate of taxation on petroleum products to meet revenue targets.

Precisely, it is the best time and the easiest policy measure which can be implemented to reverse the tide of persistently declining exports.

The writer is a PhD candidate in Economics and teaches at the University of Bristol, UK

ajpirzada@hotmail.com

Published in Dawn, Business & Finance weekly, April 11th, 2016
 
Very little attention has so far been paid to the exchange rate dynamics as a source of the exporting sector’s poor performance. The structure of economy and the composition of our export basket make it only more vulnerable to adverse movements in REER.

The temptation to mess with the exchange rate is too much for any Pakistani government to resist. Why not make the PKR fully floating? Can the economy withstand such freedom? If not, then why would the REER be any more likely?
 
The temptation to mess with the exchange rate is too much for any Pakistani government to resist. Why not make the PKR fully floating? Can the economy withstand such freedom? If not, then why would the REER be any more likely?

fully floating increases volatility which is not good for businesses. But managing the exchange rate doesnt mean letting it appreciate even if it continues to result in balance of trade losses.
 
fully floating increases volatility which is not good for businesses. But managing the exchange rate doesnt mean letting it appreciate even if it continues to result in balance of trade losses.

That is correct, but as I said before, the temptation to meddle with the exchange rate for temporary political or other gains is simply too much for the government to resist. Why do you think the recent unjustified appreciation was foisted in the first place? Given the basic economic adversity, the natural decay of the PKR is about 10% per year, averaged over the long term. Temporarily shoring up the PKR value only makes the inevitable adjustment that much more traumatic, that is all.
 
That is correct, but as I said before, the temptation to meddle with the exchange rate for temporary political or other gains is simply too much for the government to resist. Why do you think the recent unjustified appreciation was foisted in the first place? Given the basic economic adversity, the natural decay of the PKR is about 10% per year, averaged over the long term. Temporarily shoring up the PKR value only makes the inevitable adjustment that much more traumatic, that is all.
Basis for 10%? Any assumptions or just from historical trend?
 
Export performance is of course poor and is going to get worse with CPEC when Chinese goods flood Pakistan. However Pk Rupee is being held up because of huge ( $17-billion) remittance arriving in Pakistan.

I wouldn't mess with the exchange rate either. It is working okay at the moment with anyone allowed to take out up to $5,000/- with any problem. I would leave the things as they are.
 
But 10%? Can you explain your methodology please.

It is simple: Plot out the values of exports and imports, and the exchange rate for Pakistan for the last 40 years.
 
That is correct, but as I said before, the temptation to meddle with the exchange rate for temporary political or other gains is simply too much for the government to resist. Why do you think the recent unjustified appreciation was foisted in the first place? Given the basic economic adversity, the natural decay of the PKR is about 10% per year, averaged over the long term. Temporarily shoring up the PKR value only makes the inevitable adjustment that much more traumatic, that is all.

political temptation is a valid argument... but i dont think that the recent appreciation in REER was politically motivated. It was more a result of loose monetary policies in the West. Other developing countries have experienced similar trends.

but maybe you are right. Our FM did appreciate the currency from 110 to 100 after coming to power.

Export performance is of course poor and is going to get worse with CPEC when Chinese goods flood Pakistan. However Pk Rupee is being held up because of huge ( $17-billion) remittance arriving in Pakistan.

I wouldn't mess with the exchange rate either. It is working okay at the moment with anyone allowed to take out up to $5,000/- with any problem. I would leave the things as they are.

unfortunately, things have not stayed as they were. REER has been appreciating significantly for last two years. How can you leave this as it is and continue to loose on the exports?
 
Pace of fall in exports 3 times faster than imports
By Shahbaz Rana
Published: April 13, 2016
232SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1083604-trade-1460519463-109-640x480.jpg

This leads to 5.5% widening of trade gap that stands at $16.9 billion. PHOTO: REUTERS

ISLAMABAD:
Pakistan’s trade deficit worsened to $16.9 billion in the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which was $3.7 billion higher than the projection made by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), putting foreign currency reserves under some pressure.

The trade bulletin, released by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) on Tuesday, showed that both exports and imports contracted in July-March 2015-16, but the pace of decline in exports was three times faster than imports.

Pakistan’s exports plunge to 4-year low

The trade deficit – gap between exports and imports – widened 5.5% to $16.9 billion, reported the national data collecting agency. It was $882 million higher than the gap in the corresponding period of previous fiscal year and was also more than the remittances the country received during the period.

The IMF had anticipated that the trade gap during nine months would stand at $13.7 billion, but the actual figure was way larger than that.

202.jpg


CREATIVE COMMONS

This may have implications for the country’s foreign currency reserves that are also taking a hit from the slower-than-anticipated growth in remittances. The State Bank of Pakistan on Tuesday released the remittances data for the first nine months, which showed only 4.1% growth.

In March, the inflow of worker remittances amounted to $1.5 billion, 3.14% lower than February 2016 and 8.7% lower than March 2015.

Textile products: Govt to probe fall in exports despite offering incentives

All international financial institutions are warning about the slow pace of growth in remittances and its implications for the external sector stability.

The trade deficit widened despite a $3.1-billion bonanza that the country got in shape of a sharp fall in the oil import bill due to a plunge in global prices from July to February. Oil imports during the eight months amounted to only $5.1 billion.

From July through March, exports dropped to $15.6 billion, which were $2.3 billion or 12.9% less than the receipts in the same period of previous fiscal year, reported the PBS.

A major reason behind the fall in exports, which were also $973 million less than the IMF projection, was the absence of an enabling environment for businesses.

Last week, IMF Director Masood Ahmad said Pakistan’s exports were hurt by multiple factors including competitiveness concerns and appreciation of the real exchange rate was not the sole factor affecting the growth in export shipments.

In the IMF’s view, Pakistan is losing competitiveness in the wake of a fall in cotton prices, appreciation of the real exchange rate, power outages and an unfavourable business climate.

Imports during July-March shrank 4.2% to $32.5 billion. These were $1.4 billion less than the comparable period of previous year, but roughly $3 billion higher than the IMF forecast.

Venting out: Textile exporters foresee fresh fall in exports

Monthly reading

On an annualised basis, the trade deficit widened 20.5%, or $315 million, to $1.85 billion in March this year, according to the PBS. The deficit expanded on the back of around 10% fall in exports and 3.8% rise in imports.

Exports stood at $1.74 billion in March, $184 million lower than the receipts in the same month a year earlier. Imports, however, rose $131 million to $3.6 billion.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 13th, 2016.

Last week, IMF Director Masood Ahmad said Pakistan’s exports were hurt by multiple factors including competitiveness concerns and appreciation of the real exchange rate was not the sole factor affecting the growth in export shipments.

In the IMF’s view, Pakistan is losing competitiveness in the wake of a fall in cotton prices, appreciation of the real exchange rate, power outages and an unfavourable business climate.

I do not completely agree. Power outages and business climate has been the same for last more than 5 year. Why has the export decline worsened so much only in last two years? REER appreciation fits very neatly with the data coming in.

Exactly. How and why that was done is only one example of how this critical monetary policy tool is misused by Pakistani governments.

So do you find merit in the argument that recent decline is exports is driven by REER appreciation of last two years?
 
So do you find merit in the argument that recent decline is exports is driven by REER appreciation of last two years?

That is only one of the many problems Pakistani exporters are facing currently.
 
That is only one of the many problems Pakistani exporters are facing currently.

indeed. but those problem have been there for more than 5 years. The recent decline which started around 2013 seems to have its root in REER.
 
indeed. but those problem have been there for more than 5 years. The recent decline which started around 2013 seems to have its root in REER.

I can accept that statement, but, since the causes are manifold, the effective solutions must take into account other factors too. Adjusting the exchange rate will help, undoubtedly, but other things need to happen as well.
 

Back
Top Bottom