What's new

US not coming to PH aid vs China

StormShadow

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
3,485
Reaction score
-10
The United States yesterday said it will not side with any party in the Spratlys conflict, which is to say that the Philippines’ most powerful ally will not be coming to its aid should its spat with China escalate into a shooting war.

The US Embassy made this clear yesterday in reaction to a Malacañang statement earlier yesterday expressing confidence that Washington would honor its commitment under the two countries’ Mutual Defense Treaty to come to the aid of a beleaguered ally.

“The US does not take sides in regional territorial disputes,” the US press attaché Rebecca Thompson said in an e-mailed statement when contacted for comment to deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte’s invoking of the 60-year-old MDT.

Thompson said the US was “troubled by incidents in the South China Sea in recent days that have raised tensions in the region” and that Washington opposes “the use or threat of force” by any of the countries with rival claims to the Spratly islands.

The brief statement said the US “shares a number of national interests with the international community in the South China Sea” but did not mention the Philippines or the two countries’ over-a-hundred-year-old ties and mutual defense pact.

In an interview on state-run dzRB radio earlier yesterday, Valte figured the Philippines could count on its superpower ally should the situation with China deteriorate because of the MDT.

“I haven’t seen the terms of the MDT quite recently but I know that as an ally, the United States will help if ever it reaches that point because of the Mutual Defense Treaty,” she said.

“Hopefully, it doesn’t get to that point because, again, we are committed to the resolution of the issue in the most diplomatic and the most peaceful way possible,” she added.

Armed Forces Chief General Eduardo Oban was also earlier quoted as saying that the military remained “hopeful that the Americans will not stand aside should the conflict erupt and that they can invoke the MDT with the US.”

The MDT was signed on Aug. 13, 1951, in Washington, D.C. with both parties declaring “publicly and formally their sense of unity and their common determination to defend themselves against external armed attack.”

Under the eight articles of the treaty, both parties agree to aid and support each other in settling any international disputes by peaceful means, among others.

Sentor Francis Escudero said the Department of Foreign Affairs should be designated as the lead agency to talk about the Spratlys issue in public.

Avoid any mistakes

He said Malacañang should not do so through its spokespersons “in order to avoid any faux pas on our part.”

Escudero said the government should also review the MDT to ascertain if US forces would indeed come to the rescue if the Philippines is attacked because of the Spratlys dispute.

He said Palace officials should carefully review the MDT, read through its fine print and get confirmations from the US government “if indeed this situation is covered.”

But he remained optimistic that US military support would be given in case of an armed conflict as “a gesture of longstanding friendship.”

Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. said the House would leave it to the Department of Foreign Affairs assert the country’s sovereignty claim over the West Philippine Sea.

“The DFA is articulating our position and we’re supporting it,” he said.

Armed Forces spokesperson Commodore Miguel Rodriguez said the AFP leaves it to the DFA to make an official comment on the developments in the Spratlys issue.

Not joining Vietnam

“We submit our reports to the DFA and the DFA crafts the country’s position on KIG [Kalayaan Island Group] affairs,” he said, referring to the portion of the Spratlys claimed by the Philippines.

He also said the military was not joining Vietnam, another Spratlys claimant, in the deepening rift with China over the issue.

“We are not looking at partnering with one country against another country,” he said.

At a Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry Independence Day dinner last night, President Aquino came face to face with Chinese Ambassador Liu Jiangchao who only a few days ago had warned claimant states to stop exploring for oil in the Spratlys.

“Like all neighbors, I know we may have our disagreements sometimes,” Mr. Aquino said in his speech, acknowledging Liu’s presence.

“(But) no one can deny the benefits our relationship has brought to both our countries throughout the years,” he added.

Liu adverted to “incidents” that have arisen between the two countries since Mr. Aquino came to power.

“But facts have manifested we are stronger than these tests,” he said.

Liu said the Aug. 23 botched hostage crisis involving Hong Kong tourists had been settled with a “loving and understanding heart.”

“The last thing the Chinese government and people want to see is that the [Spratlys] dispute stands in the way of the progress of our wonderful relations and the friendship and brotherhood of our two peoples,” Liu said, who hinted at a visit to China from Mr. Aquino later this year.

In the past two weeks, the Philippines has accused China of making at least six incursions into Philippine territory in the past four months, a charge that Beijing has dismissed as rumors.

Recently, the Aquino government has made a point of referring to the South China Sea as the West Philippine Sea to bolster its claim to certain parts of the Spratlys.

US not coming to PH aid vs China | Inquirer News
 
The way china bully its innocent and peaceful neighbors like Philippines, India and Vietnam etc. It shows its ugly face and dream of harassing people, disturbing peace and prosperity in the Asia.

These country should get united and should be ready to face the evil.
 
Last year, the US jumped into the issue on Japan's side, declaring that the Senkakus were covered by the US-Japan security treaty and thereby implying, however implausibly, that the United States was ready to go to war with China over these remote Taiwanese rocks.

The incident attracted heightened attention because the United States had announced its ''return to Asia'' on the back of the issue of maritime security, in US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's words, "a national interest in freedom of navigation, open access to Asia's maritime commons, and respect for international law in the South China Sea".

2011 is, apparently, different.

On May 31, US Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell spoke at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and had the opportunity to flay the Chinese for their latest piece of high-handedness in the South China Sea ... but chose not to.

When asked by Malaysia's China Press if the United States had ''any position'' on the most recent incident, Campbell responded:

Almost every week we see incidents of various kinds (laughter), between fishing vessels ... between scientific vessels...prospecting ships...and the like. Our general policy remains the same. We discourage a resort to violence in these circumstances, or threats, and we want to see a process of dialogue emerge. We communicate intensively and privately with a variety of states associated with the South China Sea side [sic] and I think we are going to continue to do that as we go forward. [2]
In Kuala Lumpur, Admiral Robert Willard used the same phrasing in discussing Vietnam's gripes with China: The ''United States doesn't take sides in a dispute,'' Willard said. ''It's strongly committed to see that the sides within the dispute handle them peacefully and through dialogue and not in confrontation at sea or in the air.''

Assistant Secretary Campbell's seemingly dismissive response is rather striking when reports of a plethora of recent alleged Chinese intrusions in the South China Sea are taken into account.
 
The US finally realizes that challenging China in her own waters is a losing battle.:azn:
 
Last year, the US jumped into the issue on Japan's side, declaring that the Senkakus were covered by the US-Japan security treaty and thereby implying, however implausibly, that the United States was ready to go to war with China over these remote Taiwanese rocks.

The incident attracted heightened attention because the United States had announced its ''return to Asia'' on the back of the issue of maritime security, in US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's words, "a national interest in freedom of navigation, open access to Asia's maritime commons, and respect for international law in the South China Sea".

2011 is, apparently, different.

On May 31, US Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell spoke at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and had the opportunity to flay the Chinese for their latest piece of high-handedness in the South China Sea ... but chose not to.

When asked by Malaysia's China Press if the United States had ''any position'' on the most recent incident, Campbell responded:


In Kuala Lumpur, Admiral Robert Willard used the same phrasing in discussing Vietnam's gripes with China: The ''United States doesn't take sides in a dispute,'' Willard said. ''It's strongly committed to see that the sides within the dispute handle them peacefully and through dialogue and not in confrontation at sea or in the air.''

Assistant Secretary Campbell's seemingly dismissive response is rather striking when reports of a plethora of recent alleged Chinese intrusions in the South China Sea are taken into account.

Do you have the English version of the report condemning Vietnam's military exercise?
 
Here is a news for china about phillipians where usa is having an military exercise
.
.
US, Philippines to hold war games amid tension in South China Sea
.
The United States and the
Philippines are set to hold naval
exercise amid heightened tension
in Western Philippine Sea
following allegations of intrusion
by Chinese Naval personnel in
the Philippine-occupied area of
the disputed Spratly Islands.
Share
Philippine military authorities said
though the the joint naval
exercise has nothing to do with
the reported Chinese incursions
in Philippine territories, according
to Armed Forces spokesman
Commodore Jose Miguel
Rodriguez.
Philstar.com reports, “It has been
programmed since last year,”
Rodriguez added. There has
been no announcement yet of
the specific location of the
military exercises but Navforwest
operates mainly in the Sulu Sea
and nearby waters.
Earlier the Philippines said it has
documented at least six
intrusions by China's naval boats
into Philippine sea lanes. China
denied the allegations and said
they were based on rumors.
The report said, "The planned
naval exercise, called
“Cooperation Afloat Readiness
and Training” or CARAT, is in
accordance with the Mutual
Defense Treaty between the
Philippines and the US, officials
said."
The Philippines said it is
preparing adiplomatic protest to
the United Nations
on the alleged intrusion by
China's naval boats in the
disputed islands.
A day after the exchange of
heated diplomatic notes in
Manila, Vietnam has joined the
already tense situation by
accusing China of their presence
in a Vietnam-occupied island
where a seismic operation is
being conducted. Vietnam claims
a Chinese naval boat has caused
damage to their seismic
equipment and facilities in the
area.
Vietnam, in an apparent move to
flex its muscle on the disputed
sea lanes said itwill conduct a
live ammunition drill in the area
on Monday.
The planned military exercise by
Vietnam is similar to the
scheduled US-Philippine war
games in the West Philippine Sea
on June 28.
The Spratly Islands are being
claimed in whole or in part by
several countries in Southeast
Asia including China, Vietnam,
Malaysia, Taiwan, Brunei and the
Philippines.
Meanwhile the US has expressed
its desire to pursue a peaceful
resolution of the on-going
tension in the Spratlys involving
six claimant countries.
“We’ve been troubled by some
of these reports about the South
China Sea and believe they only
serve to raise tensions and don’t
help with the peace and security
of the region,” said State
Department spokesman Mark
Toner.
“We support a collaborative
diplomatic process... and call on
all claimants to conform all of
their claims, both land and
maritime, to international law,”
he said.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom