US NOT insisting on Pak to shutdown LeT because of Indian concerns: Clinton

[Rafi]

Yes, you're right, something is burning since there was a drone strike in SW yesterday.

This is the last series of Indian politicians who have any affection for Pakistan just because it was erstwhile India. The new generation is coming and it is going to be indifferent.

Drone strike, the naxals are coming - hide sonny.

 

[MrIndianSikh]

Dude, why are you cursing MMS?. This is the same man, whose policies made India what it is today, and took us to a point where
Pakistan cannot match us in any field. This same guy's diplomacy helps India on the global world scenario. He is a great man,
but is surrounded by corrupt coalition partners.

his policies only came in affect when we needed them to be the poisonous fruit from the tree of Nehru's folly is showing today it is because of Nehru and his socialist policies that we have many poor India liberalized its economy in 1991 only when the economy was about to collapse MMS is weak leader that is why i hate him and i see him as a traitor by going to the murderous congress party who committed genocide on my people he would be a vital asset for diplomacy but thats it

he is great but weak he would make a good external affairs minister but not a good PM Modi is needed for that position Rab Sukh rake

 

[Varad]

his policies only came in affect when we needed them to be the poisonous fruit from the tree of Nehru's folly is showing today it is because of Nehru and his socialist policies that we have many poor India liberalized its economy in 1991 only when the economy was about to collapse MMS is weak leader that is why i hate him and i see him as a traitor by going to the murderous congress party who committed genocide on my people he would be a vital asset for diplomacy but thats it

he is great but weak he would make a good external affairs minister but not a good PM Modi is needed for that position Rab Sukh rake

Have you forgotten the very same guy, when opposed by his own LEFT partners and opposition for signing US nuclear deal, single handedly acquiesced the parliament to adopt it, even when Sonia Gandhi was starting to doubt the deal. I dont think he is
weak. He is a mastered craftsman in diplomacy.
Regarding 1984, i only have to say India has had a troubled past. Lets try to forget it and move forward.

 

[MrIndianSikh]

Have you forgotten the very same guy, when opposed by his own LEFT partners and opposition for signing US nuclear deal, single handedly acquiesced the parliament to adopt it, even when Sonia Gandhi was starting to doubt the deal. I dont think he is
weak. He is a mastered craftsman in diplomacy.
Regarding 1984, i only have to say India has had a troubled past. Lets try to forget it and move forward.

having a weak man as your leader will result in bad things remember what happened with Nehru and China

he is good but weak that is my view simple he would make a much better diplomat or even a better finance minister i have to say that his adoption of free market policies helped shape our economy which is a workhorse still running to go farther and higher places but we must continue these free market and capitalist policies while including urbanization involving the betterment of our poor

another one of my points is that MMS is clean but his party is full of corrupt arseholes who entrench themselves in the government and bureaucracy which is i support the progressive BJP more having 1 good clean man in a party full of corrupt people is bad overall as they say majority rules

 

[Hobo1]

Drone strike, the naxals are coming - hide sonny.

Naxals are confined to forests of central India unlike Taliban who have literally over run Pakistan and can strike at will with impunity anywhere in Pakistan. And have even earned Pakistan the title of most dangerous nation

The World's Most Dangerous Countries

 

[Varad]

having a weak man as your leader will result in bad things remember what happened with Nehru and China

he is good but weak that is my view simple he would make a much better diplomat or even a better finance minister i have to say that his adoption of free market policies helped shape our economy which is a workhorse still running to go farther and higher places but we must continue these free market and capitalist policies while including urbanization involving the betterment of our poor

another one of my points is that MMS is clean but his party is full of corrupt arseholes who entrench themselves in the government and bureaucracy which is i support the progressive BJP more having 1 good clean man in a party full of corrupt people is bad overall as they say majority rules

Unfortunately the perception of a weak PM or leader is characterized by how the media puts his image infront of us. Nehru at his
time did made his mistakes like some MMS makes now, but i argue against that he was weak. If he was he wouldnt have the guts
to advocate NAM at that time in the world.

Also, though i prefer Congress over BJP, but i too think that after all those scams and 2 successive terms Congress shouldnt come into power as that wouldnt be healthy for democracy. But presently i still dont see a strong opposition.They all are divided
into 3rd front and NDA.Only 2014 will tell who will come to power.