What's new

'US partnering with India to contain China'

What you think to kill some animals and eat for taste who cant even retaliate is what you called an act of bravery??
Kudos.........

lol ... Seriously ...

Plants are not killed ?

Plants can retaliate ?

Do you wrestle a plan into submission to be cooked ?

See, what lack of first class protein does to you thinking .....
 
lol ... Seriously ...

Plants are not killed ?

Plants can retaliate ?

Do you wrestle a plan into submission to be cooked ?

See, what lack of first class protein does to you thinking .....

moral of the story, young students please have lots of protein, it enhances your thinking capacity.
 
There is no doubt that India is a valuable weapon for the USA. India is the only country stupid enough to stand on the front line in a war against China.

All the other US allies are smart enough to polite when USA asks them to stand on the front line. "No, you first, boss. I'm right behind ya."

This definitely complicates China's strategic planning because India can easily open a second front if there is a military clash in Korean peninsula, East China Sea, Taiwan or South China Sea.

That's why China needs to counter-contain India. All countries surrounding India should join a military bloc lead by China. Just as importantly, China has to support internal rebels like Kashmir and Naxalites.

The best move here is to give suitcase-sized nuclear weapons to Kashmiri and Naxalites.
 
There is no doubt that India is a valuable weapon for the USA. India is the only country stupid enough to stand on the front line in a war against China.

All the other US allies are smart enough to polite when USA asks them to stand on the front line. "No, you first, boss. I'm right behind ya."

This definitely complicates China's strategic planning because India can easily open a second front if there is a military clash in Korean peninsula, East China Sea, Taiwan or South China Sea.

That's why China needs to counter-contain India. All countries surrounding India should join a military bloc lead by China. Just as importantly, China has to support internal rebels like Kashmir and Naxalites.

The best move here is to give suitcase-sized nuclear weapons to Kashmiri and Naxalites.

The best move here is to give suitcase-sized nuclear weapons to Kashmiri and Naxalites

file.php
 
You just don't have any logic.
It's a report coming out of washington.
India rising power,
Well you guys just won't accept it and there's no use of debating on it.
Go get some logic!Poor Pakistani

India Pakistan and China need more bilateral trade with road and rail links. A number of cities in all three countries are just few miles away.

If China India and Pakistan would stop pulling each others leg for a decade and focus strictly on economic and infrastructure development we can have a region thriving just like the EU and USA.
 
India try to contain China? It can't even defend itself.

The irony is that China can give Kashmiris and Naxalites thermonuclear suitcase bombs with more explosive yield (100's of kT) than India's strategic missiles (20 kT). Now that would make India a colorful place to live.
 
You just don't have any logic.
It's a report coming out of washington.
India rising power,
Well you guys just won't accept it and there's no use of debating on it.
Go get some logic!Poor Pakistani



Can you read? Do you realize the report is authored by an American Think-Tank? Do you find any GoI or military official talk about containing China with American help?

Dont rant on with your own inner hate without at least reading the original post.

Yes and Washington is the new god..seriously american think tank will author what it wants the geo-politics to reflect..they understand their position on how their word is taken authentically in the desperate nations..hence such writing can only be regarded as theoretical ego massage.

Where does the article say India wants to be superpower? "Playing power dogma is beyond Indian capability" - Please cut the racist bit short...

India only has tried to keep its borders intact and Pak-China have taken land from it
...that much for being an imperial mouthpiece.Pakistan has been lapdog of Britain and then US and now China.

China itself is a merchantilist and expansionist power.If geography hadnt been kind,you wouldnt be licking its boots either...

Taken land from it?? when and where???
Pakistan had been in the US camp since its beginning that too not soo obidiently but Indians power ambitions first invited the British colonials and after being f_ked by the British it went into soviet camp as last resort.
 
I don't know, it's not my business. But Indian needs some serious reshaping around its borders. Currently it looks aweful to me.

So says a man from Yugoslavia.

Can someone point to Yugoslavia on a map?
 
It's best that world's two (Largest Democracy and Oldest Democracy) join hands to respect each other values and importance against a Communist nation which has no knowledge about human rights and value of Freedom (speech). This is not a competition of goods and Diplomatic status on world platform, This is understanding to provide safety and maintain peace in world. But some Pakis will not understand it and Chinese should keep in mind that their exports are not sold all around the world becoz of there qualities, but becoz of there cost.
If someone is not friend, it does not mean that it is enemy. Every Nation has it strong point and weak point.
 
It's best that world's two (Largest Democracy and Oldest Democracy) join hands to respect each other values and importance against a Communist nation which has no knowledge about human rights and value of Freedom (speech). This is not a competition of goods and Diplomatic status on world platform, This is understanding to provide safety and maintain peace in world. But some Pakis will not understand it and Chinese should keep in mind that their exports are not sold all around the world becoz of there qualities, but becoz of there cost.
If someone is not friend, it does not mean that it is enemy. Every Nation has it strong point and weak point.

Democracy is on the verge of failure on all international fronts as democratic leaders as well countries world wide are so rife with corruption, backwardness and underdevelopment. Democracy has failed to bring anything in Africa while the Chinese dollar has contributed to biggest poverty uplifting of the century in Aftica. Democracy itself has failed to solved any indian woes on poverty and desperation. American democracy bought the two biggest illicit wars of the century and now Americans feels necessary to support their partners in crime to save the sinking ship. What today democracy really is a pro-American racket of thieves and criminals serving colonial masters over national interests.

Democracy by American definition means letting all the troll have a go at incompetency. Otherwise China is as elective as any country should but unfortunately for the limited indian thinking it does not bear the label of "democracy".
 
It's best that world's two (Largest Democracy and Oldest Democracy) join hands to respect each other values and importance against a Communist nation which has no knowledge about human rights and value of Freedom (speech). This is not a competition of goods and Diplomatic status on world platform, This is understanding to provide safety and maintain peace in world. But some Pakis will not understand it and Chinese should keep in mind that their exports are not sold all around the world becoz of there qualities, but becoz of there cost.
If someone is not friend, it does not mean that it is enemy. Every Nation has it strong point and weak point.

...and people think that the Chinese government produces the best propaganda :rofl::rofl::rofl:.
 
India try to contain China? It can't even defend itself.

The irony is that China can give Kashmiris and Naxalites thermonuclear suitcase bombs with more explosive yield (100's of kT) than India's strategic missiles (20 kT). Now that would make India a colorful place to live.

kudos.jpg
 
US had been partnering with india since 2000. US had partnered with india with certain expectations in mind. And further US expectation from india should not be in blind faith. Rather US should ask the candid question what had india delivered in last 10 years on US-india partnership?

Other than taking US to wrong path in Afghanistan for its own agenda to harm its arch enemy Pakistan, indian share in US-india partnership was only taking from US. And question for US is - can india or is india really prepared to provide anything at all for US partnership? Specially when China bagged $20 billion worth of contracts from india (half of what few hundred man Obama army can get from india trip) without flinching from any of its position.

Containing China in US vocabulary means economic, military and geo strategic posturing in line with US wish. We have seen economic and technological disparity india has; that hardly present any proposition for india to posture in line with US wish. In geo strategic sense indian influence is still limited to 2-3 countries in the neighborhood and struggling to keep those. What left is military – is india in any position to challenge Chinese might? That goes without saying. And with far less money and technological base india will be in no position to be tool of US “containment” policy.

There is a growing chorus in indian media about “indian-chini” bahi bahi. That chorus did not come from vacuum but from some of these realizations that there is limit in indian ability to take China head on. So india just putting the friendly face buying times and hoping in the mean time US is satisfied with indian lip service and will do something about China.

It would be foolish to think US does not have the same realization on india’s ability. But US also know india would appreciate partnership title and for more US export that title is not much to invest in.
 
U.S. always wants 3rd world countries to do the dirty work for them.
 

Back
Top Bottom