What's new

What kind of options does Pakistan have for retaliation?

Should we respond militarily or by blocking trade routes?

  • Military

  • Blocking Trade routes

  • Both


Results are only viewable after voting.
Ugly rapist retard. We already did. Ask your PM who cried like a bitch and blamed Pakistan.

If you cannot counter the arguments, you are starting with personal name calling shows your mentality! We did not stop with that... We came and hit where it hurt.

If you are going to use offensive name calling... please don't quote me!
 
There are several options including using tactical small weapons against Indian military targets in Indian occupied kashmir or..... Evn on the Indian air bases
yeah,, but capturing kargil is best option and also easiest one..:pakistan::yahoo:
 
Our response should be to escalate and push the envelope of hostilities so that nuclear war is a likely outcome and a real possibility. The deterrence then comes into play. Otherwise, we would not have ever tested our strategic potential in deterring war and would succumb to external and internal pressures exposing our own vulnerabilities.
 
Our response should be to escalate and push the envelope of hostilities so that nuclear war is a likely outcome and a real possibility. The deterrence then comes into play. Otherwise, we would not have ever tested our strategic potential in deterring war and would succumb to external and internal pressures exposing our own vulnerabilities.

Time will tell, what the Pak response will be, it should be very severe on these delluded, ignorant bhartis.
 
Cuz your moronic Govt has never stopped incursions from your soil. Oh wait that's cuz your Govt is controlled by Army and ISI. Congrats now we have the root cause of all this war hysteria.
Even your moronic Nehru promised the world of a Plebiscite.
 
It's not irrelevant. UN declared Disputed territory is just that, it doesn't make it a sovereign territory of any specific member state. Pakistan will retaliate in this disputed territory.
It's interesting to argue that the terror haven territory attacked by India isn't Pakistani but any "retaliation" by Pakistan would still violate, for example, post-9/11 UNSC Resolution 1373 clause 1-c, in the sense that it would be considered a de facto effort by Pakistan to support a terrorist safe haven. (The clause does not specify, hence does not require, that the haven be in the territory of any particular entity.)
 
In opinion Pakistan has two options.

Diplomatic: Despite India's aggression the international community will not want things to escalate between two nuclear armed nations. Now there will be pressure to let go; specially considering there was no real damage done and PAF was able to engage intruders in time.

Here is the card Pakistan can play. Okay we won't retaliate, but:
1) India should issue real assessment of its botched air strike (this will take the gas out of Indian Media, Public and Govt. hype)
2) India should issue statement of regret about carrying out unprovoked act of aggression against Pakistan.
3) India offers unconditionally to resume dialog with Pakistan on all bi-lateral issues including Kashmir.

If something on the above lines is achieved; Pakistan would achieved a lot without escalating things. Pakistan will be considered more responsible of two nations and turn international opinion in Pakistan's favor.

Although, very reasonable demands but its unlikely India will agree to this.

Military: Hit some important installment/target which has following attributes using Stand Off Range in IOK.

1) Target is highly visible. So India can not deny such an action and seeing it destroyed/hit will take out gas from Indian Media and India Public about their invincibility.

2) Minimum Loss of Life: This may help in preventing further escalation. Loss of life on Indian-side will give Indian Media chance to repeat its 'Revenge Revenge Revenge' mantra. Leading to further escalation.

I can think of fuel/ammunition depot(at airbase or cantonment), strategically important bridges etc.
 
Kashmir is an integral part of India and Pakistani's can apply burnol!
lol what is this bullshit?

United Nations say Kashmir is disputed territory.

Irrelevant. The post-9/11 binding UNSC Resolutions do not apply to specific territories but apply to the territories of all member-states.
Are you an idiot?

this attack happened in disputed territory. Jammu and Kashmir is not part of the sovereignty of India.

get over yourself.
 
220 million Pakistanis take RSS as Hindu terrorist organization. And that's what matter. Ofcourse India will be pissed but, trust me, hardly few will shed tears in the world.
It wasn't any RSS member that conducted those air strikes. RSS or not, the world will not stand for killing of civilians.
You might as well kill the citizens of Guam or Maldives for all the good it will do for Pakistan.
 
We have no obligation to honor it... So what are you going to do about it?
Even Louis Mountbatten said Plebiscite is a must. You are being dishonest.

We have no obligation to honor it... So what are you going to do about it?
Then keep fighting then. Because you guys are dishonest. United Nations say Kashmir is disputed territory.
 
lol what is this bullshit?

United Nations say Kashmir is disputed territory.

Let them say, Is UN so worried about Kashmir now-a-days... nope.. even if they were... we don't give a damn!

Are you an idiot?

this attack happened in disputed territory. Jammu and Kashmir is not part of the sovereignty of India.

get over yourself.
Disputed territory??? Pakistani propaganda ministry is working well! Congratz!
 
Let them say, Is UN so worried about Kashmir now-a-days... nope.. even if they were... we don't give a damn!


Disputed territory??? Pakistani propaganda ministry is working well! Congratz!
Are you drunk on alcohol or smoking Marijuana?

United Nations and UNSC says Kashmir region is disputed territory and rejects the Indian narrative on Kashmir.


Are you an idiot?

Had India been correct all this time, UNSC would have voted in resolutions supporting India on the Kashmir dispute.

but that is not the case.

UNSC is vehemently against India's narrative on Kashmir.

And accepting Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India violates the Shimla agreement as well.

Regards you hypocrite.
 

Back
Top Bottom