What's new

When Innovation, Too, Is Made in China

This is because the concept of the space shuttle is an utter failure, it doesn't mean that US cannot build some mega sophiscated rocket.

They have the plan to build the Ares type rockets.
Amazing...This is from a country that is proven to be behind the US and Russia in space. The Space Shuttle is a reusable vehicle. So in effect, China is saying the concept of a reusable vehicle is flawed and destined to be a failure...:lol:
 
Amazing...This is from a country that is proven to be behind the US and Russia in space. The Space Shuttle is a reusable vehicle. So in effect, China is saying the concept of a reusable vehicle is flawed and destined to be a failure...:lol:

China is not going toward the path of the space shuttle. And US is going to retire all the shuttles right? If it isn't a failure, so why they will soon scrap it?
 
China is not going toward the path of the space shuttle. And US is going to retire all the shuttles right? If it isn't a failure, so why they will soon scrap it?
And you boys boast about your 'superior' IQs...:rolleyes:...The Space Shuttle fleet is retired mainly for budgetary reasons. And yes we have no problems acknowledging the ships are expensive to maintain. But they more than returned for what they cost. Expendable vehicles are limited in payload in human and non-human cargo and we already know there is a limit on how much we can learn about large vehicle operations. The Space Shuttle gave us valuable experience in that, just like how the Soviets/Russians are knowledgeable about long duration in space. Eventually the design will be obsolete but until something is proven to be inadequate it is not obsolete and the design has yet to be proven inadequate for the current needs.

So much for those high IQs statistics...:rolleyes:
 
Yes...Here is what that source said about canard...

Canards DO increase frontal RCS.

I saw a chinese paper was posted on another online forum saying that carnard design is also feasible in stealth plan with numerical and experimental verification.

SAAB's stealth plan for Korean Airforce also adopts canard design.

ksaab78xp4.jpg


kfx201byblacktailfad31i.jpg


20091204112519&
 
Last edited:
And you boys boast about your 'superior' IQs...:rolleyes:...The Space Shuttle fleet is retired mainly for budgetary reasons. And yes we have no problems acknowledging the ships are expensive to maintain. But they more than returned for what they cost. Expendable vehicles are limited in payload in human and non-human cargo and we already know there is a limit on how much we can learn about large vehicle operations. The Space Shuttle gave us valuable experience in that, just like how the Soviets/Russians are knowledgeable about long duration in space. Eventually the design will be obsolete but until something is proven to be inadequate it is not obsolete and the design has yet to be proven inadequate for the current needs.

So much for those high IQs statistics...:rolleyes:

Pardon Sir, who is "we." Your Viet m*ms were probably hanged to death before you could step into America.

I think you guys are dumber because your gene pool has been contaminated by polynesians.
 
Last edited:
russian and american are working in tendum with eachother in space technology. where is china ? they are trying what ussr tried to do ( trying to do everything on their own) and we all know the fate.

the reason nasa is so sucessful is because they never underestimate or think they can do everything on their own.

they are always ready to apperitiate and learn from even smaller rearching countries such as india , france , uk.
 
Pardon Sir, who is "we." Your Viet m*ms were probably hanged to death before you could step into America.
Ah...The loser Canadian is back. With nothing as usual.
 
I don't give a $hit about about the IQ stat, even SK maybe has the highest avg IQ, but still a bug sized colony.
I certainly do not give a hoot about IQ stats but you Chinese boys do. So if you with the high IQ is going declare that the reusable vehicle concept is a failure, do provide credible sources to back it up.
 
Originally Posted by ao333 View Post
Pardon Sir, who is "we." Your Viet m*ms were probably hanged to death before you could step into America.

DO THEY have a military in canda ? or they just spit while they talk with their big mouth in case of war?
 
I certainly do not give a hoot about IQ stats but you Chinese boys do. So if you with the high IQ is going declare that the reusable vehicle concept is a failure, do provide credible sources to back it up.

Do you have something against the Chinese? Your trolls show that you care. And seriously, given the strength of the white US military, white Americans don't care about China, only colored ones and polynesians do. :|
 
Do you have something against the Chinese? Your trolls show that you care. And seriously, white Americans don't care about China, only colored ones and polynesians do. :|
And you must have something against non-whites. Polynesians are contaminants on this planet? What happened, did a Viet-Canadian kicked your *** sometime back?
 
I saw a chinese paper was posted on another online forum saying that carnard design is also feasible in stealth plan with numerical and experimental verification.

SAAB's stealth plan for Korean Airforce also adopts canard design
It is feasible, but the US determined there are better ways than canards for maneuverability. At least for now, anyway.
 
And you must have something against non-whites. Polynesians are contaminants on this planet? What happened, did a Viet-Canadian kicked your *** sometime back?

He is right, us Chinese are not interested to invade America with hordes of illegal aliens and outbreed the White Americans.

So beware, American KKK is on the rise to kick out aliens like you in their country. :yahoo:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom