What's new

Why Indians are fat

solid snake

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
1,176
Reaction score
0
Gene making Indians fat found

6 May 2008, 0047 hrs IST,Kounteya Sinha,TNN

NEW DELHI: British scientists may have an answer to why, despite best efforts, you are constantly putting on weight, especially around the waist. Well, it's all in your "Indian" genes.

A new large scale British study has identified genetic variations, occurring commonly among Indian Asians, that make them heavier and more prone to diabetes.

The findings shows that Indian Asian adults carrying these genetic variations are, on average, 3.8kg heavier than people of European ancestry.

The scientists also found that the variants - found in a gene called FTO and another close to a gene called MC4R - cause a 2cm expansion in waist circumference and a tremendous tendency to become resistant to insulin, leading to Type 2 diabetes.

Dr Anoop Mishra from Fortis Hospital said, "The study led by Jaspal Kooner of Imperial College, London, has found that the variant is significantly more common among people of Indian ancestry. This is a very important finding for the Indian population, both in India and abroad. It shows that these genetic variations causing obesity occur more often in Indians. When added with bad diet and exercise, Indians are at a far greater risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes."

MC4R protein plays a pivotal role in many aspects of physiology, including regulation of appetite and energy expenditure. The severe form of MC4R-related obesity is a consequence of alterations in the gene sequence resulting in an inactive or less active MC4R protein.

By contrast, the new variants discovered lie some distance from the MC4R gene. The team suspects that the variant changes activity of the MC4R gene, perhaps by disrupting DNA regions required for normal activity of MC4R.

Dr Ruth Loos, leading author from the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit said, "Several studies had shown that rare, highly disruptive variants in the MC4R gene were responsible for very severe, genetic forms of obesity. This latest collaboration has uncovered more common variants that affect more people."

The study was led by investigators from the Cambridge GEM consortium (Genetics of Energy Metabolism) and Oxford University and was a collaboration between 77 institutions from the UK, USA, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and Sweden.

The team studied more than 77,000 adults and found that two copies of genetic variants resulted in an average increase in weight.
The team now plans to uncover how the DNA variants affect activity of the MC4R protein, which is a key player in orchestrating information from the body to control appetite and energy expenditure to keep body weight in balance.

The team proposes that altered activity of MC4R, imposed by the variants, might reduce its ability to carry out this important role.

"The team, however, has also emphasized that, although gene variants can affect weight, body mass index and obesity, they are only part of the story. Lifestyle actions such as good diet and regular exercise are vital to control weight," Dr Mishra added.

Dr Ines Barroso from Welcome Trust Sanger Institute added, "The precise role in obesity of genetic variants in FTO and near MC4R remains to be discovered, but we can now begin to understand the biological consequences of these variants. This is where this research will make a difference."


Gene making Indians fat found-India-The Times of India

First a report finds that you guys have small penises and now that you guys are fat? Don't mean to be immature but this is quite funny :rofl:
 
Well...our ancestors loafed around and wrote books like Kamasutra....so obviously their descendants are paying the price.

Europeans' ancestors were busy trying to prevent themselves from freezing to death...hence their slightly more "sporty" genes.
 
You are probably right. My Arab friend and I always say that the blacks in America are so tall and strong because of the slavery years. Look at their cousins in Africa.
 
You are probably right. My Arab friend and I always say that the blacks in America are so tall and strong because of the slavery years. Look at their cousins in Africa.

No...the slavery years have little to do with their physical stature.

Gene pools take thousands of years to show small changes.

The reason why blacks in America are generally good physical specimens is because of how they were selected by their buyers or traders....on the basis of physical stature.

Its called artificial selection. These techniques are widely used to breed better livestock.

For the sake of political correctness, such things are not usually discussed in public.
 
Let me just say, and this will be classified as racist, but black girls are as far away from being "good physical specimens" as any can be. Black guys are usually tall and muscular, but black girls are usually overweight and loud and stupid.
 
The theory of evolution is just a theory. You guys are making big assumptions as if it were a fact.

Not that I'm disputing a fat gene, but it has nothing to do with writing the kamasutra.
 
Since WWII, eugenics or artificial selection among humans is considered unethical and racist.

Countries like China run Eugenics programs to increase their average IQ, isolate high-performing groups for selective breeding etc. etc.

Germany, Britain have all had eugenics programs at some point in their history.
 
The theory of evolution is just a theory. You guys are making big assumptions as if it were a fact.

Not that I'm disputing a fat gene, but it has nothing to do with writing the kamasutra.

LOL...dude Kamasutra is just a joke....rest assured reading the Kamasutra won't cause any significant changes in your genes :)

Oh and evolution is a fact. The debate is over.
 
If it is just genes, why are the new generations fatter? It is true in India, USA, Europe, Japan, China...

May be it is more due to the sedentary lifestyle available to more people now. The reverse fact of some people not getting fat despite all that may well be true.
 
We are fat because as more and more time has passed we've started consuming all sorts of sugars aka Junk food.

Sugars = complex and simple.
 
It's a theory and on feeble grounds I can ask two or three questions and the entire house of cards would come tumbling down.

Really? Then I wonder how the geniuses at MIT didn't think of these questions as yet!!:cheesy:
 
It's cause in most western nations the theory of evolution is taught as fact even though evolution was never proved.

Darwin just made it up when he saw birds of long, medium and short sized beaks and figured, natural selection took place. Evolutionists never argue with cellular level science. Variations in species and the making of a new species is a different thing.
 
It's cause in most western nations the theory of evolution is taught as fact even though evolution was never proved.

Darwin just made it up when he saw birds of long, medium and short sized beaks and figured, natural selection took place. Evolutionists never argue with cellular level science. Variations in species and the making of a new species is a different thing.

Not true at all....established views are always being challenged by students and professors...

The fact is, that:

1. Evolution hasn't been disproved by anyone
2. Its the best explanation out there
3. It gets validated every day by new fossil finds.

A case in point: Einstein's theory of relativity has been challenged many times since it was first developed.

If you can disprove evolution, please do so. Rest assured, you will become world-famous overnight.

If you have the time, read Darwin's seminal work on Evolution. Its available online for free at Project Gutenberg.
 
It's cause in most western nations the theory of evolution is taught as fact even though evolution was never proved.

Darwin just made it up when he saw birds of long, medium and short sized beaks and figured, natural selection took place. Evolutionists never argue with cellular level science. Variations in species and the making of a new species is a different thing.

You were really serious when you wrote this!

Darwin made such an elementary mistake and no one noticed for all these 100s of years?
 

Back
Top Bottom