What's new

Will Washington Foment War Between China and India?

true for chinese and indian government, but what about chineses and indians?

chinese politicians listen to the one overanks them, so "the hyper-patriotism" can be reduced to the minimum level. what about this in democratic india, especially when your medias wants nothing but eyeballs.


Media doesn't decide anything. You and I will not decide either. We are not allowed either. It's right to speech. If Media is all what to do ? Then there will be 100 Wars till date and Guess what NOT A SINGLE SHOT FIRED between INDIA and CHINA in last 50 Years. Military only say to increase Quality + Quantity. Few other countries says to boost Sale. Few says for sake of personal oppertunity. What Really matter is Country chief of both countries says and till day Its peaceful for last 50 years. Small issues are always there with every country but that doesn't mean WAR :tup:
 
China has East Asia problems to worry about, not some stupid war on the other side of the Himalayas that never got resolved.
 
Media doesn't decide anything. You and I will not decide either. We are not allowed either. It's right to speech. If Media is all what to do ? Then there will be 100 Wars till date and Guess what NOT A SINGLE SHOT FIRED between INDIA and CHINA in last 50 Years. Military only say to increase Quality + Quantity. Few other countries says to boost Sale. Few says for sake of personal oppertunity. What Really matter is Country chief of both countries says and till day Its peaceful for last 50 years. Small issues are always there with every country but that doesn't mean WAR :tup:

chiefs could be kick out of their office in less then 3 months, and more than 6 prime minister resigned in the first 12 months in japan. do you still believes in the bold part above?
 
chiefs could be kick out of their office in less then 3 months, and more than 6 prime minister resigned in the first 12 months in japan. do you still believes in the bold part above?

I can't say about Japan. Japan-China war was very brutal and till date Japan is proud of it.

I am saying about India-China. Hope you understand. :tup:
 
This is just some US propaganda to compel India to purchase more American thus bringing back more $$$$ to the USmly. hardware and the Chinsese spend more money on their defence ( as if sum1 is stupid enough to go to war with them) and lets lets not forget that because the Indians are getting more weapons so it fuels the arms race with Pakistan and Pakistan buys more US arms again profitting the US, so the US gets three birds in one stone...........
 
If there is war, it would only be means for China to forcefully get back South Tibet (Arunachal Pradesh) from India as a priority. Beijing needs to have Mao's courage once again to use force to get back its land from India. Decades of endless disputes with India is really going nowhere so far. Time to use force.

he he he.....you dnt have any idea what your talking about.
 
China has neither the means nor the will to tackle India once again. We are not living in the sixties.

1. China cannot come out unharmed on an offensive against India even even you consider the military superiority.

2. Couple the above reason, with China's economic scenario, the possibility of an overt aggression is impossible.

3. The himalayas are a ....lol...logistics would be hell.

4. India is a nuclear power and a formidable power in the south Asian region.
 
Even U.S policy makers knows Indian leaders are not manipulated so easily --- This so-called analyst is very out-of-touch with geo-politics. Hope not all U.S strategists are like that.
Funny when some of them even identified India --as a swing state . lol...
 
Indian politicians however bad they might be in tackling internal matters had kept India away from being used as a pawn by super powers during the cold war. Now in this uni-super power world with India also emerging as a major power, I hope our politicians will show the same maturity that they shown in the Cold War era and keep external powers away from formulating our foreign policy.
 

Back
Top Bottom