What's new

Zhuhai Airshow 13th Edition - September 28, 2021 to 3rd October, 2021

AECC
https://720yun.com/t/68vkz7p7sdh?scene_id=81322704

DvOi9bQ.png

99Wc4Bb.jpg

QnbzlGF.jpg


m1SiIjL.jpg
mNz4Ujj.jpg
7DgsLcx.jpg
UTYPPye.jpg

AEP500发动机
oxOPzFA.jpg

CRmur4L.jpg

WZ-16
HvloOGl.jpg
rsu351k.jpg

0Oeg3dW.jpg
ItcOass.jpg
L2x7N0S.jpg

YULONG
rdcLnjs.jpg
AtadA3Q.jpg

AEP60
2LtPh8X.jpg
aQVhjoe.jpg

AEP80
2oUNMRV.jpg

oWgUCIh.jpg
 
Last edited:
WS-10 is not a high bypass engine by any stretch and has been used extensively in J-10 and J-11. Comparatively, it has higher bypass ratio than WS-15 which means reduced fuel consumption.
LOL All respected senior/professional Chinese said WS-10 based on ( CFM-56) civilian engine ànd relatively high bypass ratio of all indigenous engines ànd by the way its a first successful turbofan of China
 
Any updates on the HQ-26 (SM-3 equivalent)?


HQ-9bE ans System as well as hq-22 being mentioned I think now like s-400 HQ-9 supports various missile types with many dodge to radar types
Covering low, med and high altitude detection and engagement
 
LOL All respected senior/professional Chinese said WS-10 based on ( CFM-56) civilian engine ànd relatively high bypass ratio of all indigenous engines ànd by the way its a first successful turbofan of China

The high-bypass version of the WS-10 is the WS-20 on the Y-20B.

The WS-10 is not a high-bypass engine. It wouldn't be powering fighters if it were.
 
LOL All respected senior/professional Chinese said WS-10 based on ( CFM-56) civilian engine ànd relatively high bypass ratio of all indigenous engines ànd by the way its a first successful turbofan of China


Com on ... the WS-10 is NEVER ever a high bypass engine and no-one ever claimed this. Also I'm not sure what you mean with "relatively high bypass ratio"? AFAIK we don't know any specific data to say it has a higher high bypass ratio in comparison to the US F100 and F110 or the Russian AL-31 and AL-41 engines.
 
About 10/11 kg heavier than sd-10 and 13 feet or 3.9 meter vs sd-10 3.8ish

range prettymuch what expected or speculated against fighters Around 150km

both jf-17 and j-10 can carry 4 on dual rails 😉



View attachment 780359

View attachment 780360

Terminal engagement via datalink and Infra-red is super super sexy !!!!!! No knowing when the missile goes pit-bull ....
 
Might want to wait for TVC for surprising maneuvers.

I wouldn't throw a spanner with reference to TVC development in China.... That's a wholesome new game and what they demonstrated lastly with J-10C, isn't on back burner at all. In-fact, its a huge progress and indeed surprising in coming times. Now coming to J-20, I have more interest into a powerful flying which used to lack due to previous engine.
 
Might want to wait for TVC for surprising maneuvers.
J-20 has much better manoeuvrability than you can see even without TVC. Look at this F-22 demo
you will see F-22 lit up its afterburners all the way during the demo. In each turn, F-22 pulled maximum thrust as the two engine nozzles looked burning bright.

F-22 relies heavily on full engagement on afterburners during the demo otherwise the demo cannot be such stunning.

Same happened with JF-17 demo

J-20 pilots should be allowed to use the afterburners more often with greater thrust for the airshow. Therefore its turns can be a lot sharper and the demo can be more entertaining. PLAAF leadership is way too conservative on this matter.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom