What's new

Pakistan Army APC Inventory

Whatever we buy, I hope it comes with proper radio and comms equipment, one that can be used to send out distress signals to ask for backup.
 
That I don't know.
Was the gun held on a stand? Or was the guy firing it sitting on the gun he was firing? Was the Length of the gun double or triple the length of an outstretched hand?
 
Was the gun held on a stand? Or was the guy firing it sitting on the gun he was firing? Was the Length of the gun double or triple the length of an outstretched hand?
No they only recorded the plane and bullets not the gun.Should I send you the video?
 
Considering it's COIN specific acquisition, it will be limited in numbers and will deploy in hot zones.
By the way, The surplus stock of American MRAPs could have full filled this role at much cheaper and faster rate.
My issue is shape of this vehicle. Why we don't go for vehicles of these shapes
1624376433059.png

1624376536650.png

1624376585891.png

1624376870282.png


The one we are testing is basically wheeled APC not an MRAP. Plus the shape it has I think it would have slightly more difficulty to move in those areas.
 

Attachments

  • 1624376455347.png
    1624376455347.png
    3 MB · Views: 31
  • 1624376571838.png
    1624376571838.png
    129.4 KB · Views: 38
Doesn’t HIT produce Dragon APC?
Wouldn’t the cheapest option be producing more Dragon APC in HIT since the APC needed is for COIN and Dragon APC can perform well against terrorists?
Dragoon project is a disaster. A poor decision which was primarily meant to fill up pockets in military and ministry of interior.
My issue is shape of this vehicle. Why we don't go for vehicles of these shapes
View attachment 755557
View attachment 755559
View attachment 755561
View attachment 755562

The one we are testing is basically wheeled APC not an MRAP. Plus the shape it has I think it would have slightly more difficulty to move in those areas.
Are you organizing a cat walk for armored vehicles? Since when the 'beauty' became a criteria for armored vehicles? In military, if a vehicle is ugly, but gets the job done with in the economic brackets, then its the right vehicle.
 
Dragoon project is a disaster. A poor decision which was primarily meant to fill up pockets in military and ministry of interior.

Are you organizing a cat walk for armored vehicles? Since when the 'beauty' became a criteria for armored vehicles? In military, if a vehicle is ugly, but gets the job done with in the economic brackets, then its the right vehicle.
How was Dragoon a disaster?
 
How was Dragoon a disaster?
It's not a MRAP, it's basically a M113 on wheels, aka a death trap, can't stop an IED or a mine or anything. There's a reason US didn't deploy them in Afghanistan.
 
Dragoon project is a disaster. A poor decision which was primarily meant to fill up pockets in military and ministry of interior.

Are you organizing a cat walk for armored vehicles? Since when the 'beauty' became a criteria for armored vehicles? In military, if a vehicle is ugly, but gets the job done with in the economic brackets, then its the right vehicle.
Not cat walk. But what I am saying is the BT 4 is not a MRAP but it falls in APC category. There is a reason MRAP are of different shape. It's not about looking beautiful it's about of being certain shape and features to move more easily in KPK and Baluchistan.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom