What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that the West deliberately provoked Russia into this. You think Russia acted without provocation. So we can agree to disagree.



That’s fine as long as China is left alone and not dragged into this. Starting a trade war with China will be a disaster. I’ve seen empty shelves and panic buying during covid. A trade war with China will be far worse.



It’s disingenuous to say that the West created countries and installed regimes, but it’s okay because they respect their sovereignty. There’s a whole series of countries whose sovereignty wasn’t respected. Afghanistan and Iraq come to mind.



All Zionist regimes are bad and should go. They’re not good for mankind.

Ukraine and the US are classic examples of how democracy can be subverted. Money will buy you any government you want.

A Zionist comedian can be installed in power through funding from a Jewish Ukrainian oligarch, Ihor Kolomoisky. What were the Ukrainians thinking?

Both candidates in US presidential elections are backed by Jewish American oligarchs. E.g. Sheldon Adelson for Trump.

Any proper democracy needs to have safeguards in place to prevent a takeover by foreign interests. That’s what people who care for their countries should be working for.

Jewish is loyal to USA.

So if people say that he is installed by USA, I believe it.

There's no better candidate than him.

Of course, he was elected thru public election... with CIA help.
 
Here is a first hand account of what a foreign volunteer (army vet) experienced when they came under fire from Russian cruise missiles and air power.


Turns out that being on the receiving end of heavy firepower is scary and fighting Russia isn't exactly like war criming Iraqis or Afghans.

He left after that.
 
Russia is drawing down troops From Syria and Nagrono Karabakh in order to deploy in Ukraine. As well as troops from the Far East and the Syrians themselves.

They have truly humiliated themselves.

To be fair they are fighting 150,000 ukranians who have full logistical, Intel and financial support from nato. I'd say that Ukranians have better battlespace awareness Than the Russians.

More satellites, more airborne radar. Ukranians are probably fed every flightpath of every Russian air asset. I would be very worried if I was a Russian soldier.
 
Russia is drawing down troops From Syria and Nagrono Karabakh in order to deploy in Ukraine. As well as troops from the Far East and the Syrians themselves.

They have truly humiliated themselves.

To be fair they are fighting 150,000 ukranians who have full logistical, Intel and financial support from nato. I'd say that Ukranians have better battlespace awareness Than the Russians.

More satellites, more airborne radar. Ukranians are probably fed every flightpath of every Russian air asset. I would be very worried if I was a Russian soldier.
You can always volunteer for Ukraine. You seem much tougher than those ex US soldiers who ran away. You're from the internet after all.
 
:coffee: :-):-)

Russia is merely copying and applying the tactics used by US in Syria. That was how the civil war got started there.

So Russia are now mulling to ship 50,000 mercenaries from Syria and Iraq to the Western part of Ukraine if Zalensky still refuses to comply to their demand about not joining NATO and amending the constitution. Ukraine will be engulf in a long civil war and after that, what good is Ukraine to NATO then?

It is a smart Chess move by President Putin.

The main Russian Army are assisting the pro-Russia militia, and by encircling the cities in breakaway Republics in Donbass, Lugansky and Denetsk, the success of the militia are ensured.

Today I read Mariopul, Odessa, etc have just fallen and new mayors are appointed.
 
Last edited:
You can always volunteer for Ukraine. You seem much tougher than those ex US soldiers who ran away. You're from the internet after all.

The last time the US and Russia faced off 200-300 Russian mercenaries were blown to bits in Syria.

The US can inflict horrible effects on Russian units and quickly with mass. Russia doesn’t have anywhere near the PGM stockpile the US does.
 
One thing is for sure after this conflict certain changes should be made to Un body for not repeating these types of cases.

The veto power for cases involving outside interference to internal conflicts should be increased with extra steps and extra measures. For example troop buildup, threats should each have measures and loss of veto power if attacking country has veto power on that case or similar related cases can be added as well. For example if it is not Russia but Usa fighting against Ukraine most of us with Usa control of media power would be believing that all donbass residents are killed and there is a genocide going on and zelensky would be the new wannabe fuhrer. Most green votes on last Un vote would be then approve Usa intervention in that country as most of the countries are economically dependent to west and fear sanctions or internal conflicts supported by them and later outside interventions claiming oppression etc.

The veto power involing measures against countries attacking others should be decreased so measures can pass more easily to dampen out the attacking force or best detterrance against doing so. Russia attacking Ukraine or similar or Israel attacking Labennon, Syria etc. should not be easily vetoed by Russia-China in 1st case and Usa-Britain or France which is more neutral but after Russia-Ukraine conflict is naturally more towards Nato side in 2nd case. Using economic power to influence Un votes should also be blocked with measures as Usa can use all types of sanctions even unilaterraly to curb nagetive voting countries and Russia can use gas and materials.
 
One thing is for sure after this conflict certain changes should be made to Un body for not repeating these types of cases.

The veto power for cases involving outside interference to internal conflicts should be increased with extra steps and extra measures. For example troop buildup, threats should each have measures and loss of veto power if attacking country has veto power on that case or similar related cases can be added as well. For example if it is not Russia but Usa fighting against Ukraine most of us with Usa control of media power would be believing that all donbass residents are killed and there is a genocide going on and zelensky would be the new wannabe fuhrer. Most green votes on last Un vote would be then approve Usa intervention in that country as most of the countries are economically dependent to west and fear sanctions or internal conflicts supported by them and later outside interventions claiming oppression etc.

The veto power involing measures against countries attacking others should be decreased so measures can pass more easily to dampen out the attacking force or best detterrance against doing so. Russia attacking Ukraine or similar or Israel attacking Labennon, Syria etc. should not be easily vetoed by Russia-China in 1st case and Usa-Britain or France which is more neutral but after Russia-Ukraine conflict is naturally more towards Nato side in 2nd case. Using economic power to influence Un votes should also be blocked with measures as Usa can use all types of sanctions even unilaterraly to curb nagetive voting countries and Russia can use gas and materials.
Does Veto power or UN even matter when US is aggressor? . Now Russia is following US footsteps .enjoy because its fair game now
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom