What's new

Pakistani FM Hina Rabbani avoids Bangladeshi FM Momen’s call to seek apology for 1971 genocide at Colombo

@RandyB

Pakistani Army did not commit genocide in BD but they did commit many war crimes.

Those at the highest and lower levels have gotten away with their crimes up to now.

With most of the culprits now dead or about to die soon, it is a shame that none will be brought to face trial.

Ultimately it is Pakistan that lost out as BD running the show may just have saved them from the state they are in now.
 
Bangladesh is not sitting in a strategic position, a location that anyone with global ambitions would want to control, or at least manipulate.

Two long wars were thrust upon Pakistan just because of its location. The USSR should have just stayed out and not try to prop up a hated puppet regime in Afghanistan. The USA should have kept the ideological zionists away from the helm and not planned to build a base right next to China's border. A base in Qatar is enough to keep an eye on China and the rest of the region. But imperialist powers do what they do. Pakistan tried to make the best of the situation given a deeply corrupt society full of evil.

Bangladesh is not Pakistan and Pakistan is not Bangladesh. Pakistan can entirely annihilate India and reduce the population of this planet by a whole 1.5 Billion give or take a few. Bangladesh cannot. The two have different destinies.
Please, please, wipe out not only India but also BD. If you do not throw your atomic machines soon, a time is soon coming when your govt leaders will have to feed your atomic machines to its hungry population.

Your PM has already accepted all the IMF conditions to get the bailout money. In a situation like this, you are talking about atomic bombs.

Are you sane?
 
Bangladesh should thank Pakistan for protecting them from Indian hegemony after partition so they could have an identity. If it wasn't for Pakistan, BD would be India right now. I swear to God ask for an apology one more time and this will happen

View attachment 915135
Pakistan is certainly not protecting BD. But we can say that a strong Pakistan helps BD to take policies totally independent from Indian wishes.
 
Pakistani Army did not commit genocide in BD but they did commit many war crimes.
I don't know what your definition of genocide is but most academicians agree that what happened in 1971 was genocide.
Would you say that Hitler did not commit genocide against the Jews or that there was no genocide in Bosnia ?

For eg this source lists Bangladesh in 1971 as one of the only 9 genocides of the 20th century.

 
It seems you don't know the history of the founder of your own country. Mr Jinnah was a secular nationalist in the mould of his mentors Dadabhai Nauroji, a Parsee, and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, a liberal Hindu Brahmin. The main reasons Mr Jinnah left the Congress were because, under Mr Gandhi , the Congress abandoaned its emphasis on constitutional methods and because it started to appeal to religious issues to mobilize the masses. Mr Gandhi was instrumental in Congress taking up the slogan of "Ram Rajya" and supportering the maulanas in the Khilafat movement - a move Mr Jinnah opposed because he correctly anticipated would unleash religious zealotry that could not be controlled and because he wanted to look forward like Ataturk in Turkey and not backwards.

I hope you know most of the ulema in undivided India opposed the creation of Pakistan and labelled Mr Jinnah Kafir e Azam. In Mr Jinnah's vision, Pakistan was created as a homeland for the subcontinent's Muslims because he feared that under a democratic government the Congress would have a permanent majority and the political and economic rights of Muslims would be suppressed. Till the end, he tried to find a compromise which would enshire constitutional guarantees protrctiing political and economic rights for Muslims in an undivided India. However, the Congress leadership, with the exception of Mr Gandhi, and Mr Mountbatten believed giving in to Mr Jinnah's demands would result in a very fragile state and ultimately Mr Jinnah was left with no option but to accept what he himself described as a "moth eaten" Pakistan. Mr Gandhi was bitterly opposed to partition and tried to offer concessions including making Mr Jinnah the Prime Minister of undivided India to avoid takseem e hind , but he was isolated within the Congress. The irony is that while Mr Gandhi and Mr Jinnah are both considered fathers of their nations, neither of the countries they created ended up adopting the visions their fathers had.

It was the Pakistani army that committed genocide starting with Operation Searchlight. Are you trying to say Yahya, Tikka Khan and Niazi were operating under the orders of some Brahmins? Mujib had been democratically elected Prime Minister of undivided Pakistan. He had no reason to resort to any violence because he would have become the legitimately elected ruler of undivided Pakistan anyway.


The whole demand of Muslim League was a seperate homeland for Muslims.

Pakistan was formed in the name of Islam. If it bothers you, feel free to jump off a bridge.

The rest of your rant is irrelevent.

It seems you don't know the history of the founder of your own country. Mr Jinnah was a secular nationalist in the mould of his mentors Dadabhai Nauroji, a Parsee, and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, a liberal Hindu Brahmin. The main reasons Mr Jinnah left the Congress were because, under Mr Gandhi , the Congress abandoaned its emphasis on constitutional methods and because it started to appeal to religious issues to mobilize the masses. Mr Gandhi was instrumental in Congress taking up the slogan of "Ram Rajya" and supportering the maulanas in the Khilafat movement - a move Mr Jinnah opposed because he correctly anticipated would unleash religious zealotry that could not be controlled and because he wanted to look forward like Ataturk in Turkey and not backwards.

I hope you know most of the ulema in undivided India opposed the creation of Pakistan and labelled Mr Jinnah Kafir e Azam. In Mr Jinnah's vision, Pakistan was created as a homeland for the subcontinent's Muslims because he feared that under a democratic government the Congress would have a permanent majority and the political and economic rights of Muslims would be suppressed. Till the end, he tried to find a compromise which would enshire constitutional guarantees protrctiing political and economic rights for Muslims in an undivided India. However, the Congress leadership, with the exception of Mr Gandhi, and Mr Mountbatten believed giving in to Mr Jinnah's demands would result in a very fragile state and ultimately Mr Jinnah was left with no option but to accept what he himself described as a "moth eaten" Pakistan. Mr Gandhi was bitterly opposed to partition and tried to offer concessions including making Mr Jinnah the Prime Minister of undivided India to avoid takseem e hind , but he was isolated within the Congress. The irony is that while Mr Gandhi and Mr Jinnah are both considered fathers of their nations, neither of the countries they created ended up adopting the visions their fathers had.

It was the Pakistani army that committed genocide starting with Operation Searchlight. Are you trying to say Yahya, Tikka Khan and Niazi were operating under the orders of some Brahmins? Mujib had been democratically elected Prime Minister of undivided Pakistan. He had no reason to resort to any violence because he would have become the legitimately elected ruler of undivided Pakistan anyway.
Muktibahni and all of its helpers in any shale or form.

Mujeeb was trainee in Moscow.
 
Please, please, wipe out not only India but also BD. If you do not throw your atomic machines soon, a time is soon coming when your govt leaders will have to feed your atomic machines to its hungry population.

Your PM has already accepted all the IMF conditions to get the bailout money. In a situation like this, you are talking about atomic bombs.

Are you sane?
You clearly lack any comprehension skills and are unable to see the point. Not suprised here.

The mention of Pakistan's nuclear ability was in regards to it being a constant source of sleepless nights for the idol worshippers. Which in of itself is one of the greatest blessings of The Most High! Worth more than many mountains of gold!

Even Golda Meir took inspirarion from the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ(alaihi salam)'s life in setting out Israel's defensive strategy.

Pakistan has no PM at the current moment.

Imam Mufti Al-A'zam Mustafa Rida Al-Hanafi Al-Qadiri, Allah be pleased with him quoted a Hadith of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, “When a faasiq is honored, the Lord becomes angry and the arsh trembles due to it.”

We will never honour a mere faasiq, and you are here expecting us to show respect towards those who betrayed us?

You indeed have lost your mind.
 
I don't know what your definition of genocide is but most academicians agree that what happened in 1971 was genocide.
Would you say that Hitler did not commit genocide against the Jews or that there was no genocide in Bosnia ?

For eg this source lists Bangladesh in 1971 as one of the only 9 genocides of the 20th century.

What do you think it was genocide in 1971 when about less than 40,000 people were killed? It was only 270 days without gas chambers. And you guys want this war as genocide.

Very strange. Only 1,300 IA troops were killed in that war. Perhaps, you don’t know about this little figure.

Compare it to what Hitler did and how many Russian, American and Wesr European troops were killed in hundreds of encounters.

Please, with your small knowledge do not redefine Genocide.
 
What do you think it was genocide in 1971 when about less than 40,000 people were killed? It was only 270 days without gas chambers. And you guys want this war as genocide.

Very strange. Only 1,300 IA troops were killed in that war. Perhaps, you don’t know about this little figure.

Compare it to what Hitler did and how many Russian, American and Wesr European troops were killed in hundreds of encounters.

Please, with your small knowledge do not redefine Genocide.
I am not a professional historian. I have only pointed out what the academic consensus is, but anyone is free to believe whatever they want.
"A consensus has formed among scholars that genocides in the 20th century encompassed (although were not limited to) the following cases: Herero in 1904–1907, the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire in 1915–1923, the Holodomor in the former Soviet Ukraine in 1932–1933, the Jewish Holocaust in 1938–1945, Bangladesh in 1971, Cambodia in 1975–1979, East Timor in 1975–1999, Bosnia in 1991–1995, and Rwanda in 1994. "

The whole demand of Muslim League was a seperate homeland for Muslims.

Pakistan was formed in the name of Islam. If it bothers you, feel free to jump off a bridge.

The rest of your rant is irrelevent.


Muktibahni and all of its helpers in any shale or form.

Mujeeb was trainee in Moscow.
Lol, I see that responding to you is a waste of time. I rest my case.
 
You clearly lack any comprehension skills and are unable to see the point. Not suprised here.

The mention of Pakistan's nuclear ability was in regards to it being a constant source of sleepless nights for the idol worshippers. Which in of itself is one of the greatest blessings of The Most High! Worth more than many mountains of gold!

Even Golda Meir took inspirarion from the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ(alaihi salam)'s life in setting out Israel's defensive strategy.

Pakistan has no PM at the current moment.

Imam Mufti Al-A'zam Mustafa Rida Al-Hanafi Al-Qadiri, Allah be pleased with him quoted a Hadith of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, “When a faasiq is honored, the Lord becomes angry and the arsh trembles due to it.”

We will never honour a mere faasiq, and you are here expecting us to show respect towards those who betrayed us?

You indeed have lost your mind.
Idiot, why a little guy like you should come up with nuclear weapons? Do you think anyone is worried about your superpower status?

Better to worry about the possible bifurcation along the Khaibar-Pukhtunwala and Baluchistan lines. You are a great superpower with Rs230 to a dollar, and your PM asks IMF for loans every morning.

Bloody idiot, are you sane?
 
Last edited:
You clearly lack any comprehension skills and are unable to see the point. Not suprised here.

The mention of Pakistan's nuclear ability was in regards to it being a constant source of sleepless nights for the idol worshippers. Which in of itself is one of the greatest blessings of The Most High! Worth more than many mountains of gold!

Even Golda Meir took inspirarion from the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ(alaihi salam)'s life in setting out Israel's defensive strategy.

Pakistan has no PM at the current moment.

Imam Mufti Al-A'zam Mustafa Rida Al-Hanafi Al-Qadiri, Allah be pleased with him quoted a Hadith of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, “When a faasiq is honored, the Lord becomes angry and the arsh trembles due to it.”

We will never honour a mere faasiq, and you are here expecting us to show respect towards those who betrayed us?

You indeed have lost your mind.

lol idol worshippers are having sleepless nights because of your nukes ? and you are having good night's sound sleep ? :D
Golda Meir took inspiration from prophet and progressed Israel but you are still unable to take that lesson ? how and where you got your education ?
 
I don't know what your definition of genocide is but most academicians agree that what happened in 1971 was genocide.
Would you say that Hitler did not commit genocide against the Jews or that there was no genocide in Bosnia ?

For eg this source lists Bangladesh in 1971 as one of the only 9 genocides of the 20th century.



I am guessing that you are Hindu.

Yes some may argue that they tried to commit genocide against the Hindu population of BD but that was mainly due to the fact that they saw Hindus as their political enemies and being against West Pakistani rule. In fact Muslims in BD were also sick of being ruled by a minority that was also incompetent.

They did not have a plan to exterminate all Hindus in BD, just to make them submit to their will.

My opinion is that they did not try to commit genocide but many war crimes were committed against civilians.
 
I don't know what your definition of genocide is but most academicians agree that what happened in 1971 was genocide.
Would you say that Hitler did not commit genocide against the Jews or that there was no genocide in Bosnia ?

For eg this source lists Bangladesh in 1971 as one of the only 9 genocides of the 20th century.

India aims to write history of Bangladesh as the victor in Dhaka. Pakistan reserve all rights to counter propaganda.
I am guessing that you are Hindu.

Yes some may argue that they tried to commit genocide against the Hindu population of BD but that was mainly due to the fact that they saw Hindus as their political enemies and being against West Pakistani rule. In fact Muslims in BD were also sick of being ruled by a minority that was also incompetent.

They did not have a plan to exterminate all Hindus in BD, just to make them submit to their will.

My opinion is that they did not try to commit genocide but many war crimes were committed against civilians.

You excel in creative writing.

The East Pakistani bureaucracy was not from any minority in Bangladesh. It formed out of majority which continued operations under the new given name Bangladesh.

Mukti Bahani forces ravaged the country flaring up ethnic tensions and carrying out guerilla attacks on the security apparatus.

East Pakistani administration was far more successful in maintaining communal stability than successive Bangladeshi military junta rule and oppressive democratic governments.
 
To all bengali bit*hs crying here go f*** urself nobody gives damn about U people. Traitors!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Back
Top Bottom