What's new

Indian Denial Accepting Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism as Separate Religions

Nassr

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
835
Reaction score
0
Global/Regional Ramifications of India’s Constitutional Denial in Accepting Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism as Separate Religions

Constitutionally, India’s Prime Minister is a Hindu and not a Sikh as Sikhs by law are considered as part of Hinduism. Not only that, even Buddhists and Jains are considered as off-shoot of Hinduism and are not accepted as followers of separate religions.

Article 25 in The Constitution Of India 1949, clearly states that:

“Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly”

Article 25 in The Constitution Of India 1949

The Indian Supreme Court in a ruling of 2005 also states the Sikhs and Jains form part of broad Hindu religion.

Jains, Sikhs part of broader Hindu religion, says SC

New Delhi, August 10 [2005]

In a significant ruling defining the status of communities like Sikhs and Jains within the Constitutional frame work, the Supreme Court has declined to treat them as separate minority communities from the broad Hindu religion, saying encouraging such tendencies would pose serious jolt to secularism and democracy in the country.

“The so-called minority communities like Sikhs and Jains were not treated as national minorities at the time of framing of the Constitution. Sikhs and Jains, in fact, have throughout been treated as part of wider Hindu community, which has different sects, sub-sects, faiths, modes of worship and religious philosophies,” a Bench of Chief Justice R.C. Lahoti, Mr Justice D.M. Dharmadhikari and Mr Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan said.

The Tribune, Chandigarh, India - Nation

Such constitutional violations of Human Rights in India, in addition to internal societal fissures lead to global and regional ramifications and this is just the tip of the iceberg. The ill-treatment of Indian minorities force them to adopt extra-constitutional and extra judicial means, which in many cases have resulted in armed struggles for secession from India. The resultant response by the Indian security forces exacerbate the problem and the cycle of violence results in more violence. It has been previously quoted in this forum that India had the largest number of minority community armed secessionist groups anywhere in the world. These armed groups seek support from various non-state actors and terrorist groups within and outside India which creates problems at regional levels as well as globally. Khalistan movement in Punjab, secessionist movements in Kashmir and North East India, downing of Indian Airliner by Sikhs in Canada and Purulia Arms Drop are but some of the examples. There are numerous other examples that can be quoted.

Not accepting Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism as separate religions and considering these religions as part of majority Hindu religion through constitutional provisions is part of a much bigger problem. Though these are India’s internal matters, yet they generates problems far beyond India’s borders not only for the regional countries but for out of region countries as well.

Don’t you think that it is time for the people of India to sort out their internal mess within their borders without blaming beyond it on other regional countries and those beyond.
 
that is why indian people from all the religion included Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism, parsis, muslims are here on this forum representing their country and not many people of religions other than islam are here from the pakistan side :pakistan:

think man........
 
They are all indic faiths,but seperate religions.
Together these 4 may be called the dharmic religions.There are also the far eastern taoist/confucian/shinto faiths and abrahamic religions of course.
 
I think it went.... Vedas --> Hinduism --> Buddhism/Jainism

So technically they are branches of Hinduism.

its not. jainism and buddism are rejection of hinduism.. but then religion back then was matter of opinion, you can change from democrat to republican and back to democrat within 10 years.. and in same household you can have both living together.
 
its not. jainism and buddism are rejection of hinduism.. but then religion back then was matter of opinion, you can change from democrat to republican and back to democrat within 10 years.. and in same household you can have both living together.

Rather than rejection, it was evolution of alternate philosophies which was even supported by Hinduism. Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism shares a vast majority of traits to Hinduism. Hinduism accommodated new religions and many a reform movements, Arya Samaj is one of the most notable Hindu revivalist organizations.

And about followers of two religions within the same family then you must know that it happens even today. I personally know many Hindu families where it is a family tradition that the elder son is brought up as Sikh (as they promised to Guru Govind Singh) and younger one Hindu.
 
Rather than rejection, it was evolution of alternate philosophies which was even supported by Hinduism. Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism shares a vast majority of traits to Hinduism. Hinduism accommodated new religions and many a reform movements, Arya Samaj is one of the most notable Hindu revivalist organizations.

And about followers of two religions within the same family then you must know that it happens even today. I personally know many Hindu families where it is a family tradition that the elder son is made Sikh (as they promised to Guru Govind Singh) and younger one Hindu.

incase of sikhism its not rejection, rather it started as confluence of ideas from hinduism and sufi islam... but in case of jainism and specifically buddism it was rejection of (alternative to) mainstream religion..subsequently hinduism adopted both
 
Hindu Indians are fools to imagine any Sikh, Jain or Buddhist likes to be called a Hindu. Sikhs have separate Regts. Kitchens and dining are separate for each. Temples are different. They hardly intermarry. Religious scriptures are different. Priests are different. They don't eat in each others houses. Will not share utensils or village wells. All this is a Chanokya move to devour the minorities. Muslims and Christians will be targeted in the next phase.
 
Hindu Indians are fools to imagine any Sikh, Jain or Buddhist likes to be called a Hindu. Sikhs have separate Regts. Kitchens and dining are separate for each. Temples are different. They hardly intermarry. Religious scriptures are different. Priests are different. They don't eat in each others houses. Will not share utensils or village wells. All this is a Chanokya move to devour the minorities. Muslims and Christians will be targeted in the next phase.

What a fool!! All the crap that you posted is the same that Mullahs fed to your fore-fathers before partition and that was basically mostly about Muslims and followers of other religions in India. But that all was BS just to get power by the power hungry bunch and the Mullahs to get more attention/recognition. In India, followers of all the religion coexists peacefully with a exception of few who have the legacy of Muslims of Pakistan and BD.
 

Back
Top Bottom