MOHAN BHAGWAT IS RIGHT: India is a 'Hindu' Nation.

[SanjeevaniButi]

Okay
So one is Ferrari and other one is safari. Which one do you follow, ferrari or safari...

I see, so tomorrow I start a new religion which says you must kill at least 10 people to go to heaven, Hinduism is okey with that too ?

 

[he-man]

.........okey.

I think you are the best authority in India

Maybe,,,u never know

I see, so tomorrow I start a new religion which says you must kill at least 10 people to go to heaven, Hinduism is okey with that too ?

As i said we are far far behing christianity/judaism
Whats the point of chest thumping then??

b..itch mind your language. . before speaking about rape. w

dude,,leave her be.
U got to put in hours if u are being paid

 

[Indrani]

b..itch mind your language. . before speaking about rape. w

Son of a B...tch. I just reminded you of your history.

 

[wolfschanzze]

Meh, guessed it Secular Bhadralok are out in force, If bengal is a land of milk and honey why do they migrate to other states for employment?It used to be a place which gave many patriots but now it produces dhimmis,courtesy for 68 years of Commie brainwashing and now TMC / islamist brainwashing.
Not that i mind any indian migrating anywhere in India, but the bhadralok people carry a certain virus called Secularism which they try to spread in other states thinking their antics of secularism they do in bengal will be tolerated in other states of India, they are being culled and made dhimmis in Bengal but they still will lick the same boots of those who oppress them.
Classic textbook case of Stockholm Syndrome.

 

[Indrani]

Meh, guessed it Secular Bhadralok are out in force, If bengal is a land of milk and honey why do they migrate to other states for employment?It used to be a place which gave many patriots but now it produces dhimmis,courtesy for 68 years of Commie brainwashing and now TMC / islamist brainwashing.
Not that i mind any indian migrating anywhere in India, but the bhadralok people carry a certain virus called Secularism which they try to spread in other states thinking their antics of secularism they do in bengal will be tolerated in other states of India, they are being culled and made dhimmis in Bengal but they still will lick the same boots of those who oppress them.
Classic textbook case of Stockholm Syndrome.

They are more like the suicide bombers, brainwashed and out to destroy India.

 

[scorpionx]

Another dimwit joins the party.

 

[@RV]

I see, so tomorrow I start a new religion which says you must kill at least 10 people to go to heaven, Hinduism is okey with that too ?

Not interested in you, your religion and your complete negative talk.

Don’t argue with idiots because they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience. —Greg King

So good bye.

 

[wolfschanzze]

They are more like the suicide bombers, brainwashed and out to destroy India.

I see them everyday,they tried to stop vijaya dashami celebrations in JNU but the Tribals themselves gave them a tight slap saying they worship durga since time immemorial,Bhadralok trying their babumoshai secularism in delhi and other cities and effectively getting slapped.
How TMC is trying to cover up the Burdwan blasts and erase the evidence itself shows how the state government is hand in glove with islamic terrorists.
Even after Noakhali riots and bangladeshis shoving them out of their own lands, the bong seculars will never learn they are destined to be erased and be converted into suicide bombers or become dhimmis.That is their fate no one can change that.

 

[utraash]

Veer Savarkar is exactly the kind of person S&B is referring to. The only hindutva brigade gave at that time was rabble rousing like their muslim counterparts in muslim league. But yes, there were Indians across the length and breadth of the country who contributed



You get extra bonus to make him look a hero.

He was Hindu nationalist n let me tell you one thing Gandhi-Khoongress appeasement n rise of Muslims league would have certainly planted the seeds of division. Nor in wildest dream of Hindu wanted partition despite knowing Naokhali massacre.......
Today i am very happy we parted our ways else we would been in civil war situations or next to failed state.... We are secular by nature not becoz of khoongress others but coz of same Hindus whom many curse here conveniently .... Just look around Pakistan , Afghanistan Bdesh..... Sorry don't feel i am against any Muslims......

I am human first, Indian second third or fourth a proud Hindus......

 

[temp1994]

I am not a Congress fanboy here. Azad saying that comment or not does not refute the fact that Hindutva fundoos were British slaves with zero contribution to this country. By the way, I would like to have a link of that comment. Thanks in advance.

Here sirjee,

“as a Muslim, I for one am not prepared for a moment to give up my right to treat the whole of India as my domain and share in the shaping of its political and economic life. To me it seems a sure sign of cowardice to give up what is my patrimony and content myself with a mere fragment of it.”

" if India was divided into two states, there would remain three and half crores of Muslims scattered in small minorities all over the land. With 17 per cent in UP, 12 per cent in Bihar and 9 per cent in Madras, they will be weaker than they are today in the Hindu majority provinces. They have had their homelands in these regions for almost a thousand years and built up well known centres of Muslim culture and civilisation there.”

Note: I cannot post a link because of not fulfilling forum requirement. These quotes are from his book " India wins freedom ".


It is difficult to get references on narrative that is not supported by state, except for those sites whom you would dismiss out of hand.

I have read even worst about his beliefs in a componendium of his speeches that he delivered to muslims. He started out as a moderate muslim but got throughly radicalised like jinnah later on ( just with different results ).

Same is the case with Ali brothers ( though they never hid their motivations from start ).


He , even if not a full blown fundamentalist , was not secular as you were claiming. He had a pro-muslim bias.

 

[Indrani]

www.indianetzone.com/37/personalities_west_bengal.htm


really .. i don't need to respond to a slut...

You mean you do not respond to your mother?

 

[Guynextdoor2]

He was Hindu nationalist n let me tell you one thing Gandhi-Khoongress appeasement n rise of Muslims league would have certainly planted the seeds of division. Nor in wildest dream of Hindu wanted partition despite knowing Naokhali massacre.......
Today i am very happy we parted our ways else we would been in civil war situations or next to failed state.... We are secular by nature not becoz of khoongress others but coz of same Hindus whom many curse here conveniently .... Just look around Pakistan , Afghanistan Bdesh..... Sorry don't feel i am against any Muslims......

I am human first, Indian second third or fourth a proud Hindus......

You guys contributed nothing to the freedom movement except rabble rousing. That anyone can do.

 

[Indrani]

I see them everyday,they tried to stop vijaya dashami celebrations in JNU but the Tribals themselves gave them a tight slap saying they worship durga since time immemorial,Bhadralok trying their babumoshai secularism in delhi and other cities and effectively getting slapped.
How TMC is trying to cover up the Burdwan blasts and erase the evidence itself shows how the state government is hand in glove with islamic terrorists.
Even after Noakhali riots and bangladeshis shoving them out of their own lands, the bong seculars will never learn they are destined to be erased and be converted into suicide bombers or become dhimmis.That is their fate no one can change that.

Most likely suicide bombers.

 

[SanjeevaniButi]

As i said we are far far behing christianity/judaism
Whats the point of chest thumping then??

Who is this "we" ?

Count me out of whatever you think is your cult.

Do you know what nicene creed is ?

 

[wolfschanzze]

Here sirjee,



Note: I cannot post a link because of not fulfilling forum requirement. This quote is from his book " India wins freedom ".


It is difficult to get references on narrative that is not supported by state, except for those sites whom you would dismiss out of hand.

I have read even worst about his beliefs in a componendium of his speeches that he delivered to muslims. He started out as a moderate muslim but got throughly radicalised like jinnah later on ( just with different results ).

Same is the case with Ali brothers ( though they never hid their motivations from start ).


He , even if not a full blown fundamentalist , was not secular as you were claiming. He had a pro-muslim bias.

Forget him bro,He is a blind bhadralok secular, If you see any die hard secular here on internet who will talk big on internet but when in real life they will run in opposite direction, take a look at their name .then you know where they come from Bengal!