What's new

10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

Unfortunately even on 27 th you had nothing to support your retarded claims.

And with your pilots own confession and payload of the wrecked mig intact blew up on your face. Same goes for 300 dead claim that ended up the same way..:lol:

That said even know from what we can all confirm (not unnamed US intel "speculation" vs confirmation) is that you suffered over 20 dead and dozens captured by PLA.. While PLA still occupies allegedly indian territory.

So you lost troops and chinese are still there .. not really a win win situation for you is it?

Few corrections. This was never territory under Indian control. Chinese are on disputed territory and they are vacating. Eventually they will just like Doklam. Especially with us killing scores of them in this manner.

The US journalists reports were from publications like Times,NYP,washington post etc and the journalist actually dared you to contradict her reporting.

Now what the fk do you expect ppl here?

The F-16 claim was from a US magazine Foreign Policy relying on unnamed sources. NY times and others just reported the magazine's claim.

As already confirmed by an American member F 22 here, US News and report is a reliable and respected source.
 
Modi should be trialed for endangering the soldiers.

The border soldiers were innocent. No one want to fight and soldiers in Sino Indian borders can just get along.

USA bribed Modi to contained China.


DkpCT9JXsAIbxyr



DkpCVR0XcAUIzHQ
 
As per the history and records, China will never disclosed casulities from his side

1967: In Sikkim, India pushes China back
  • Tensions came to a head again in 1967 along two mountain passes, Nathu La and Cho La, that connected Sikkim — then a kingdom and a protectorate of India — and China’s Tibet Autonomous Region.
  • A scuffle broke out when Indian troops began laying barbed wire along what they recognized as the border.
  • The scuffles soon escalated when a Chinese military unit began firing artillery shells at the Indians.
  • In the ensuing conflict, more than 150 Indians and 340 Chinese were killed.
  • The clashes in September and October 1967 in those passes would later be considered the second all-out war between China and India.
  • But India prevailed, destroying Chinese fortifications in Nathu La and pushing them farther back into their territory near Cho La.
  • The change in positions, however, meant that China and India each had different and conflicting ideas about the location of the Line of Actual Control.
  • The fighting was the last time that troops on either side would be killed. — until the skirmishes in the Galwan Valley on Tuesday.
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/india-china-border-dispute-a-conflict-years-in-the-making/

1967 Nathu La conflict
Another flashpoint was Nathu La, India's highest mountain pass in northeastern Sikkim state, which is sandwiched between Bhutan, Chinese-ruled Tibet and Nepal.

During a series of clashes, including the exchange of artillery fire, New Delhi said some 80 Indian soldiers died and counted up to 400 Chinese casualties.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...es-decades-long-conflict-200617025851066.html
 
Again saying.. you need more hard work and a clear narrative. This time, the silence of Indian government has led the people develop hundreds of stories on what really happened during the blood bath. Every news outlet is telling its own story. Members like you are coming up with new stories. Numbers are climbing up and down.

On the other hand, Chinese have issued a strong worded statement. That's the only thing we have for now. There might be casualties on their side, but they haven't given the exact number to give a face saving to you guys. In one of the tweets, it has already been cleared. Had they wanted, they would have put a fake number of 2 died and 15 injured for example.. But they didn't do anything.

If you guys had questioned your government on surgical strikes, balakot strikes, F-16 claims, Pakistan's claims of bombing the surroundings of your Div HQs etc, you wouldn't have been seeing this day where your government is also clueless on which story to tell the public.

When you know that you have someone who is an agent (as you said he is considered among the senior Army leadership), you will not invite him to give a briefing on an incident that proved to be an embarrassment for India all over the world.

Lol,strong worded statement.Check the statement of jaishankar and of modi.And of naravane.
Chinese have buried the news in their domestic media instead of celebrating 'teaching india a lesson',global times editor who was warning india a couple of days ago now looking like a whipped boy that has been tamed and asking his cheerleaders to stand by their government.Chinese now want talks.What happened to superpower dragon?Just 40 han bloodlines exterminated and already balls dropped off?Sirf maara nahi,nirvansh kar diya.


Things dont work like that in india,maybe in pakistan.
 
Few corrections. This was never territory under Indian control. Chinese are on disputed territory and they are vacating. Eventually they will just like Doklam. Especially with us killing scores of them in this manner.

:rofl: Do you expect us to take you seriously after this excuse?:lol:

If india never occupied the territory than what the fak fak was your military there for decades? :lol:

Why the fk was your govt discussing the issue with China?Why were you demanding a chinese withdrawl for?:lol:


Why the fk were you having a stand off for?

What did your troops die for? Why did chinese capture dozens of your troops?


Go home you are drunk..:lol:
 
As per the history and records, China will never disclosed casulities from his side

1967: In Sikkim, India pushes China back
  • Tensions came to a head again in 1967 along two mountain passes, Nathu La and Cho La, that connected Sikkim — then a kingdom and a protectorate of India — and China’s Tibet Autonomous Region.
  • A scuffle broke out when Indian troops began laying barbed wire along what they recognized as the border.
  • The scuffles soon escalated when a Chinese military unit began firing artillery shells at the Indians.
  • In the ensuing conflict, more than 150 Indians and 340 Chinese were killed.
  • The clashes in September and October 1967 in those passes would later be considered the second all-out war between China and India.
  • But India prevailed, destroying Chinese fortifications in Nathu La and pushing them farther back into their territory near Cho La.
  • The change in positions, however, meant that China and India each had different and conflicting ideas about the location of the Line of Actual Control.
  • The fighting was the last time that troops on either side would be killed. — until the skirmishes in the Galwan Valley on Tuesday.
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/india-china-border-dispute-a-conflict-years-in-the-making/

1967 Nathu La conflict
Another flashpoint was Nathu La, India's highest mountain pass in northeastern Sikkim state, which is sandwiched between Bhutan, Chinese-ruled Tibet and Nepal.

During a series of clashes, including the exchange of artillery fire, New Delhi said some 80 Indian soldiers died and counted up to 400 Chinese casualties.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...es-decades-long-conflict-200617025851066.html
Who freaking cares about the casualities, all you indians do is talk about that. Why dont you talk about 1962 then when china whooped your ***?

The thing is what matters most is who completed the objective despite the loses.

Was india able to take back PP14/15? No.

Was China able to defend PP14/15? Yes.

Thats what matters to anyone who has a brain. Objectives matter.
 
Chinese have buried the news in their domestic media instead of celebrating 'teaching india a lesson'
What lesson they have to teach you after slaughtering so many of your soldiers?

Have you ever seen a winner again saying "I will kill him"? They have already taught a lesson, it's now your turn to respond.
 
Who freaking cares about the casualities, all you indians do is talk about that. Why dont you talk about 1962 then when china whooped your ***?

The thing is what matters most is who completed the objective despite the loses.

Was india able to take back PP14/15? No.

Was China able to defend PP14/15? Yes.

Thats what matters to anyone who has a brain. Objectives matter.

i just pointed history of chinese to hide their casualties...
 

Back
Top Bottom