What's new

27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

Nice logic there. I never claimed there was hard evidence of either Pakistan losing an F-16 or India losing an MKI. You claim there is no video evidence of a "viper" yet you adamantly insist an MKI or Mig-29 got destroyed yet you have zero evidence yourself.

Because a twin seater certainly seems to have gone down. The PAF claims two aircraft were brought down, and eyewitnesses report seeing two pilots eject from an aircraft. Indian media also has what seems to be 2nd recording of another aircraft going down.

They can't be Vipers for various reasons that have already been elaborated upon, and they can't be another Fishbed because the evidence indicates a dual seater was brought down. This leaves a Flanker, since the IAF didn't bring Fulcrums to the mission and the Flanker is the dual-seater it has stationed in that particular area.

I will be willing to cede my point if more evidence can be brought which indicates otherwise.

India has produced evidence of an AIM-120C5 complete with serial numbers. It is 100% real and 100% proves F-16s were involved. But continue pandering conspiracies.

Whose serial number was traced to a Taiwanese sale. Not only that, but it could have been fired in a separate incident, and it doesn't indicate Pakistan was lying at all. The ISPR simply denied they were used in the offensive raid, they could have fired from across the LOC.
 
Let me be like Indian media. PAF farted on 2 Su-30MKI and rest is history!

Seriously mistaken here. Can you hear the Kannada spoken in the beginning ? I am sure that you know this clip is of the Aerobatic Display Team crash in bangalore last month. Hawks.
Yet, to score some unknown brownie points some people share this . Good, keep it up.
 
WHAT EVIDENCE? TAIWANESE AIM-120C5 ?


They were sold the same batch. I already posted links. Try google.



http://archive.defense.gov/Contracts/Contract.aspx?ContractID=3384


http://thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26...issiles-were-used-by-pakistan-in-aerial-brawl

Some claimed that the contract number shown on the missile fragment identified it as one shipped to Taiwan, suggesting the evidence was fabricated. However, this contract was actually a larger U.S. Foreign Military Sales deal that did involve deliveries to Pakistan.
 
IF THE MISSILE REALLY BELONGS TO PAKISTAN

What if the AIM-120C5 missile was fired on the night of Balakot attack by F-16s against IAF. How does showing the missile prove that it was from the same day?
 
You questioned me in a manner more suitable to the subject. Unlike the other poster in the post above yours, who chose to show his family background to the world.

Here is the link, showing Two seater F16's ADF BN ( Did I get the name wrong ?) . Remember that the PAF is going blue in the face denying the use of the Vipers.


Also @Knuckles @AgNoStiC MuSliM @Hodor
2nd one was surely a JF-17 or low chances a viper .. First one idk why seems a Su-30 because if u pause at the right moment when the first jet is at the top of screen .. You can see a canard edge pointing out. Just my observation.
 
You questioned me in a manner more suitable to the subject. Unlike the other poster in the post above yours, who chose to show his family background to the world.

Here is the link, showing Two seater F16's ADF BN ( Did I get the name wrong ?) . Remember that the PAF is going blue in the face denying the use of the Vipers.


Also @Knuckles @AgNoStiC MuSliM @Hodor


WTH was that! Its like a WVR Within Visual Range chase, and I donot see a Mig-21 Bison. Look both a Jf17 & a F-16 together.

And then How the hell then your Air Chief showed a BVR (Beyond Visual Range) more than 100 km distance AIM-20 C5 Missile on screen as a F16 shot down.

JF-17s, Mirages were frontline offensive jets used with escort missions run by F16s.
 
They were sold the same batch. I already posted links. Try google.



http://archive.defense.gov/Contracts/Contract.aspx?ContractID=3384


http://thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26...issiles-were-used-by-pakistan-in-aerial-brawl

Some claimed that the contract number shown on the missile fragment identified it as one shipped to Taiwan, suggesting the evidence was fabricated. However, this contract was actually a larger U.S. Foreign Military Sales deal that did involve deliveries to Pakistan.


Those links don't prove anything.

It stands as is.. The one IAF displayed was indeed TAIWANESE AIM-120C5
 
Seriously mistaken here. Can you hear the Kannada spoken in the beginning ? I am sure that you know this clip is of the Aerobatic Display Team crash in bangalore last month. Hawks.
Yet, to score some unknown brownie points some people share this . Good, keep it up.
this is a sarcasm. both jets collided in mid air but i was trying to be like indian media where they make up stories and u fell for it.
 
You questioned me in a manner more suitable to the subject. Unlike the other poster in the post above yours, who chose to show his family background to the world.

Here is the link, showing Two seater F16's ADF BN ( Did I get the name wrong ?) . Remember that the PAF is going blue in the face denying the use of the Vipers.


Also @Knuckles @AgNoStiC MuSliM @Hodor
Also the first aircraft is appearing longer than the 2nd one
 

Back
Top Bottom