What's new

A Professor of Zoology in Bannu Apologize in front of Mullahs for Teaching Theory of Evolution

I became a big supporter of the theory by second year of studying life sciences, especially when I learned cell biology. But as I advanced into more complex subjects such as analytical chemistry, biophysics and genetics, I could see the holes forming. And when I got to 4th year, learning advanced biochemistry and molecular biology, I abandoned the support as I learned that this concept is mostly nonsense. The only portion of it that is sensible is spatial speciation.

So you would take out a gun and force other people to believe your theory??
 
This is what got to them. 'addressed a seminar on Oct 5 in Domel area about women’s rights'

They threw in theory of evolution as a FU for added measure.

The theory is unsatisfactory, but from a scientific perspective, they teach it based on available evidence.
it crumbles down as it has basic presuposition like religious claim, that theory is far far away from proper science approach and method.
 
I became a big supporter of the theory by second year of studying life sciences, especially when I learned cell biology. But as I advanced into more complex subjects such as analytical chemistry, biophysics and genetics, I could see the holes forming. And when I got to 4th year, learning advanced biochemistry and molecular biology, I abandoned the support as I learned that this concept is mostly nonsense. The only portion of it that is sensible is spatial speciation.
Do you think Adam was the first human?
Then why did angels knew about humans way before Adam was created?
 
When the govt is only interested in persecuting the political opposition and corruption, acts like this will become completely normal.

Leave Pakistan whilst you can.
 
Clerics in Bannu district have forced a senior zoology teacher of the Government Postgraduate Degree College to denounce English naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of biological evolution and mixed-gender gatherings, and declare that women are inferior to men.

View attachment 964679

Assistant Professor Sher Ali gave a three-page undertaking to the deputy commissioner’s office that “all scientific and rational ideas, which were in contradiction to Islamic Sharia, including Darwin’s theory of evolution, are falsehood.”


He also declared that he believed in women’s inferiority to men “in terms of wisdom as stipulated by the Sharia and declared that unnecessary mingling of women with men is not allowed.”


The senior teacher also renounced his speeches in seminars, lectures, and social media posts for being “contrary to the teachings of Islam” and said if something untoward happened to him, the clerics of Domel area of Bannu district would bear no responsibility for it.




Mr Ali, who holds MSc degree in zoology from the University of Peshawar and MPhil’s in human genetics from the Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, reportedly addressed a seminar on Oct 5 in Domel area about women’s rights in light of the Constitution and the law.


His remarks didn’t sit well with local clerics, who convened a meeting and accused him of “spreading debauchery and speaking against Islam and local culture,” and demanded strict action against him by authorities.


As the issue caused an outcry on social media, the assistant professor took to Facebook, where he has over 20,000 followers, to “clarify” his position on Darwin’s theory of evolution.


Holding a biology textbook of the intermediate course published by the KP Textbook Board, he insisted that he was teaching biological evolution as part of the course.


“Chapter 24 of the biology textbook discusses Darwin’s theory of biological evolution and if someone has problems with this topic, then they should approach the government for the removal of the chapter from the course,” he said.


Mr Ali also said if he didn’t teach the topic, the students would question his teaching ability.


He added that he always taught Darwin’s theory of evolution after seeking the consent of his students.


“I always ask them [students] whether they’re interested in studying this chapter, and if they say yes, only then I proceed,” he said.


After the district administration intervened, clerics and the professor agreed to resolve the issue. Mr Ali submitted an undertaking to the office of Bannu deputy commissioner renouncing his thoughts on Darwin’s theory.


A Facebook video showed him reading 11 points of the undertaking, which was signed by both the clerics as well as the professor.


When contacted, the professor refused to discuss the issue with this correspondent.


A senior district administration official told Dawn that the issue had been discussed on social media for two weeks prompting the administration to bring both sides to the table to resolve it.


He said Prof Sher Ali told clerics in the meeting that social media posts regarding purdah (veil) or women’s rights didn’t belong to him and that they’re “digitally altered.”


The official said both sides agreed to resolve the issue amicably.
G

Published in Dawn, October 22th, 2023

View attachment 964669
View attachment 964672
These are fucking mullahs. You have to teach your kids everything so they can compete the world in batter way.. banchoodoooo
 
Last edited:
it crumbles down as it has basic presuposition like religious claim, that theory is far far away from proper science approach and method.
We should know its limitations.
'The three limitations of Darwin's theory concern the origin of DNA, the irreducible complexity of the cell, and the paucity of transitional species. Because of these limitations, the author predicts a paradigm shift away from evolution to an alternative explanation.'

There are very few fossils over several millions of years, supposedly going from ape to modern human.
Science cannot talk about miracles. I believe evolution occurred, but I don't believe everything happened by evolution. Science and Religion are subjects under God.
 
You know there is whole scientific procedure to nullify the theories
Why do not you follow that procedure and come up with a proper research to prove this theory wrong?
Come on dude,use your analytical chemistry skills and do something good for this mankind instead of "trust me bro Darwin was wrong " type arguments
"Proof" doesn't exist in the currently accepted scientific method. In empirical science, we use evidence; proof is in the domain of mathematics and philosophy of logic, or more commonly, in popular- and pseudocience . You'll learn this in the first week of school if you ever decide to study any empirical science.

I don't need to nullify the theory. There isn't enough credible evidence for it and in many postulations, it contradicts the well established laws of physics, especially those concerning spontaneity and entropy.

Either way, true or false, the subject has no practical benefit for mankind.
 
1698135652503.jpeg
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom