Absurd To Imagine India Still Not Part Of UN Security Council: Nicolas Sarkozy

[sankranti]

Poor India, didn't exist until after the war.

India din't exist ?

Then what do you think this was ?

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

India din't exist ?

Then what do you think this was ?

Greater Britain of course. LOL even the name came from the Persian language. Based off of your logic I can say the United States of America existed prior to the Constitution.

 

[帅的一匹]

There are no criteria that can stop India to get a permanent seat in UNSC, it is absurd to think some deficiencies of India and conclude India do not fit the criteria.

We have veto power, it's not gonna be possible.

 

[asad71]

Oiling Mody to push the Rafael deal.

 

[mike2000 is back]

China in 1945 was utterly destroyed by WW2, and still in the middle of the Chinese Civil War (which would ravage on for many more years). Even today's Somalia is a paradise in comparison.

China joining the P5 in 1945 had nothing to do with riches or power (for we had neither back then), it was a mere technicality.

And that's all it still is. A technicality.

The P5 hasn't actually done much apart from safeguarding their own interests in the UN, the world is still torn apart by war and terrorism in every continent. Being a part of the P5 is nothing more than having veto power over UNSC resolutions, and many of the wars in the past few decades have actually been started by P5 members themselves. The wars in Iraq/Afghanistan/Libya/Georgia just to name a few.

I agree with you 100% . But please dont make some Indians here hate us even more for not granting them independence earlier so they could be a P5 power as well.

 

[sankranti]

Greater Britain of course. LOL even the name came from the Persian language. Based off of your logic I can say the United States of America existed prior to the Constitution.

India was not called "greater britain" you moron ........ it was called "India" or "Indian empire".

This is a Map from 1930, read what it says on the Title. Its a "Map of India", not a map of "greater britain"

The name "China" came from the Indian language ......... what does that prove ? nothing.

This is a "MAP OF INDIA" from 1765, can you read what it says ? Does it say "greater britain" ?

The First General Election of INDIA was held in 1902. It was not called "election of Greater britain".


India is an 8000 year old civilization, US is an 200 year old country.

Only a fool would compare the two and declare that US came first.

I agree with you 100% . But please dont make some Indians here hate us even more for not granting them independence earlier so they could be a P5 power as well.

Indians do not hate you for not "granting" independence earlier, we hate you for what you continued to do AFTER you "granted" independence.

Just give a search on BBC, or Telegraph, or Independent for "caste", "toilet" for any news about India and let me know what you find.

People hate you for your racist views and supremacist actions. If you still don't get it, you never will.

 

[haviZsultan]

It does not strike Sarkozy that an India without a Muslim country on the UN security council is discriminatory and against the power balance in the region. If India wants a seat then atleast there should be one muslim country which has the same stature. The UN is otherwise a discriminatory organization that does not represent the world balance correctly. Without an African and Muslim nation the UN is simply a ground for various European super states.

 

[tested]

It does not strike Sarkozy that an India without a Muslim country on the UN security council is discriminatory and against the power balance in the region. If India wants a seat then atleast there should be one muslim country which has the same stature. The UN is otherwise a discriminatory organization that does not represent the world balance correctly. Without an African and Muslim nation the UN is simply a ground for various European super states.

There is no muslim country in the world which can match India in either economic or military muscle.

That said, if religious representation were ever the criteria - then it would always be Saudi Arabia or Iran that gets it, it would never be Pakistan. We are comfortable with either

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

It does not strike Sarkozy that an India without a Muslim country on the UN security council is discriminatory and against the power balance in the region. If India wants a seat then atleast there should be one muslim country which has the same stature. The UN is otherwise a discriminatory organization that does not represent the world balance correctly. Without an African and Muslim nation the UN is simply a ground for various European super states.

U.N . is not formed on religious basis. Why you people bring religion in almost everything?? Grow up think tank.

 

[Apprentice]

There is no muslim country in the world which can match India in either economic or military muscle.

That said, if religious representation were ever the criteria - then it would always be Saudi Arabia or Iran that gets it, it would never be Pakistan. We are comfortable with either

Why wouldn't Pakistan get it? Its the 2nd largest Muslim country and the only Muslim nuclear power.

The reason why Saudis are angry with Pakistan is that we didn't send our military to fight for them. Even they wanted our army.

 

[Sky lord]

Why wouldn't Pakistan get it? Its the 2nd largest Muslim country and the only Muslim nuclear power.

The reason why Saudis are angry with Pakistan is that we didn't send our military to fight for them. Even they wanted our army.

Because let's face it, nuclear power or not, Arabs don't see you as their equal, not even close.

If ever there was a religious seat , which is unlikely, the Muslim sunni seat would go to Saudi, an Arab nation, fairly wealthy, and the land of the two holy Muslim cities.

 

[Apprentice]

Because let's face it, nuclear power or not, Arabs don't see you as their equal, not even close.

If ever there was a religious seat , which is unlikely, the Muslim sunni seat would go to Saudi, an Arab nation, fairly wealthy, and the land of the two holy Muslim cities.

They do. Thats why they always seek Pakistani military aid. Whether it be Gulf War, siege of Makkah and the Yemen war. Or the PAF's involvement against Israel in the 1967 and 1973 wars.

But relations between Saudi and Pakistan have soured recently due to Pakistan refusing to help Saudi Arabia.

Muslims of Palestine calling for Pakistan Army's help.

 

[Alpha Fighter]

Why wouldn't Pakistan get it? Its the 2nd largest Muslim country and the only Muslim nuclear power.

The reason why Saudis are angry with Pakistan is that we didn't send our military to fight for them. Even they wanted our army.

lol, Libya was nuclear power and Iran has more adv nuclear power then PAK, moreover they are more Rich then PAK.

 

[rubyjackass]

The criteria for BPL family is 32/- per day income in urban and 26/- in rural area. And we are ranked above 120 in HDI, we are too dependant on technology from other countries. We have to be a regional power before claiming that seat.

That is a political seat. And India would be a positive voice overall for the world issues. But yeah, you are right. India should improve HDI leaps and bounds.

 

[Sugarcane]

Yes - India's absence from UNSC is absurd so is the presence of France and absence of Germany.