What's new

China replacing old J-7 ‘Flying Leopards’ with J-16 multirole jets

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,191
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

China replacing old J-7 ‘Flying Leopards’ with J-16 multirole jets​

  • First batch of J-16s already deployed to the PLA’s Western Theatre Command, CCTV reports
  • Military experts say the planes have joined all five PLA theatre commands, amid increasing provocations from the US and its allies in the South and East China seas


Published: 9:06pm, 20 Jan, 2023

5f148de7-7eda-4bdf-85e2-c58407ee9f9a_7f3c87c2.jpg

A J-16 fighter jet takes part in celebrations marking 70 years of the People’s Liberation Army air force in 2019. Photo: Xinhua

The Chinese military is replacing its ageing J-7 jet fleet with advanced J-16 multi-role jets as the country gears up to face increased challenges in the region, analysts said.

State broadcaster CCTV confirmed earlier this week that the first batch of J-16s had been deployed to the People’s Liberation Army’s Western Theatre Command, which includes the Xinjiang and Tibet military districts, and is responsible for border security along the contested Himalayan frontier with India.

But defence experts said the J-16 had now been deployed to all five PLA theatre commands, noting that the new generation aircraft was going to replace the ageing J-7, or JH-7 “Flying Leopard” fighter bomber, which had served the armed forces for three decades.

“Chinese old generation military aircraft like the J-7 and J-8 are not enough to deal with the increasing security challenges around its periphery,” Fu Qianshao, a retired PLA Air Force equipment specialist, said.

“Aircraft replacement is not taking place just in the western border, as China needs more long-range advanced warplanes to deal with increasing provocations from the United States and its allies in the South and East China seas, where the PLA’s key strategic focuses are.”

A military source told the Post that the production of J-16 jets could be boosted by the home-grown WS-10 engine, which could be fitted for several aircraft like the J-16, J-11, J-10 and J-20.

According to Chinese military magazine Ordnance Industry Science Technology, China started developing the multi-role J-16 fighter bomber in 2008. It was the PLA’s answer to the US air force’s upgrade of its F-15C/D Eagle – then a key rival of China’s fourth generation J-11B heavyweight fighter.

The upgrade equipped the US F-15C with a computer-controlled active electronically scanned array (Aesa), turning it into today’s F-15EX/Eagle 2.

The Aesa technology, which features high jamming resistance to allow ships and aircraft to radiate powerful radar signals, doubled the vision and strike range of the Eagle, while retaining its stealth capability.

The J-16, meanwhile, made its first secret test flight in October 2011 and was formally put into service in 2016. It was designed to be one of two strategic partners of the PLA’s most advanced J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter jet after the J-10C.

The J-16 model, with a 12-tonne payload – almost the same as the US F-22, based on a number of earlier jets, including the Russian Su-27 and Su-30, as well as China’s indigenous fourth generation J-11B.

As a key partner of the J-20, the J-16 fighter bomber’s larger payload could boost air strike capacity and let the inferior J-10C take care of land attacks, according to Zhou Chenming, a researcher from the Beijing-based Yuan Wang military science and technology think tank.

“China expects the US to deploy at least 300 advanced aircraft to the Asia-Pacific, including the F-22 and F-35s to the Asia-Pacific, with 200 of them belonging to American allies, so the PLA needs to be armed with a certain number of J-20 and J-16,” Zhou explained.

The new J-16D fighter jet designed for electronic warfare made its debut in September 2021 at the biennial Zhuhai air show, China’s largest aviation event.

The following January, two J-16Ds along with nine other PLA aircraft were spotted by the Taiwanese military as entering the island’s southwestern air defence identification zone (ADIZ). This indicated Beijing had deployed the advanced aircraft to the Eastern Theatre Command overseeing the Taiwan Strait.

This comes as the US boosts its efforts to contain Chinese military clout, focusing on Asia under its new Indo-Pacific strategy and ramping up support for Taiwan, which Beijing sees as breakaway territory to be reunited one day.

Macau-based military expert Antony Wong Dong said the J-16 was specifically designed for a possible Taiwan attack, but needed to operate alongside the J-20 stealth fighter and the J-10C lightweight fighter jet to demonstrate each others’ strengths.

 
It’s about time. BTW, aren’t they confusing the J-7 and JH-7? Any indications the JH-7 are about to be retired soon as well?
 
China can easily replace all the J7s with the 4th generation jets but is introducing 5th generation jets so no point.

1300 4th Generation planes
200 5th generation planes.
 
Last edited:
Some reports say that they are being modified into drones now .
So basically all of them have been retired. What utility do you forsee their use as drones?

Btw, is Fu Qianshao, the retired PLAAF equipment specialist quoted in the article, considered an authoritative expert of PLAAF matters? Can we take his words as close to the official view point of the PLAAF?
 
The in that case, have all the J-7s been retired all ready?
They are on their way out, retiring, some on reserve. J 16 and JH 7 are similar type airplanes, it makes sense to replace JH 7 with J 16. Flying leopards are names used for JH 7.
 
Last edited:
Pakistan should buy them, the complete fleet, upgrade and put them in reserves !
 
Last edited:
Pakistan should buy them, the complete fleet, upgrade and put them in reserves !
I’m inclined to agree that the PAF should buy the JH-7A, if we have the long range munitions (such as the YJ-12) in hand to equip them. A squadron or two of JH-7A protected by J-10 could do some serious anti-shipping to an Indian carrier battle group equipped with Rafales, and threatening to blockade the coast, during hostilities. Having this kind of platform and missile could pave the way for Pakistan to have a roadmap to employing hypersonic cruise missiles, when the technology becomes more prevalent.

Perhaps part of the crashed Brahmos still has guidance components intact and could feed in a Pakistani version of the YJ-12.

It could also be able to launch low signature land attack or anti-shipping cruise missiles in the class of JASSM-ER/LRASM

The JH-7A could also function as platform to carry similar pods as J-16D Growler equivalent.

So for Pakistan, these platforms could be useful (especially as the PAF can’t procure any Flanker variants), and operational experience monitoring the Indians, soaking up the ‘trons could help increase the PLAAF signature libraries.

The following is Photo-shopped but you get the idea.

1674320661304.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I’m inclined to agree that the PAF should buy the JH-7A, if we have the long range munitions (such as the YJ-12) in hand to equip them. A squadron or two of JH-7A protected by J-10 could do some serious anti-shipping to an Indian carrier battle group equipped with Rafales, and threatening to blockade the coast, during hostilities. Having this kind of platform and missile could pave the way for Pakistan to have a roadmap to employing hypersonic cruise missiles, when the technology becomes more prevalent.

Perhaps part of the crashed Brahmos still has guidance components intact and could feed in a Pakistani version of the YJ-12.

It could also be able to launch low signature land attack or anti-shipping cruise missiles in the class of JASSM-ER/LRASM

The JH-7A could also function as platform to carry similar pods as J-16D Growler equivalent.

So for Pakistan, these platforms could be useful (especially as the PAF can’t procure any Flanker variants), and operational experience monitoring the Indians, soaking up the ‘trons could help increase the PLAAF signature libraries.

The following is Photo-shopped but you get the idea.

View attachment 912390

The complete fleet with all the spare parts, engines, ammunition could be stored on inactive and reserve air bases, step by step with more funds available, the inactive air bases and fighters can be reactivated.
 
The complete fleet with all the spare parts, engines, ammunition could be stored on inactive and reserve air bases, step by step with more funds available, the inactive air bases and fighters can be reactivated.
Not the complete fleet, maybe 36 of the best planes and 80-100 of the best engines.

At first only 12 should be acquired. A half dozen aircraft could be stood up as an EW squadron with Jamming pod equipped JH-7A/B variant. Another half dozen could be sold up to build a small long range anti shipping capability, and build up tactics and strategies to employ the latest munitions.

 
Not the complete fleet, maybe 36 of the best planes and 80-100 of the best engines.

At first only 12 should be acquired. A half dozen aircraft could be stood up as an EW squadron with Jamming pod equipped JH-7A/B variant. Another half dozen could be sold up to build a small long range anti shipping capability, and build up tactics and strategies to employ the latest munitions.


The Air crafts which are now in flying condition could be used as spare parts.
 
A very big reason to replace these JH-7 fighter/bomber with J-16 , is to standardize logistics as J-16 basically share the same engine as Chinese flanker series. This will reduced cost, training and time.

In terms of capabilities, JH-7 is actually quite good. Very good range. Big radome to house big AESA radar, many hard points and good payload. Decent performance with speed and attitude. If not for logistic issue. I think they will stay in PLAAF for many years to come.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom