China's KJ-600 photo leaked! The first Chinese Navy Carrier Based Early Warning Aircraft details exposed

[GreatHanWarrior]

Again with this ignorant crap. The basic layout of J-20 was an evolution from the J-9VI-II, which predates the Mig 1.44 by at least 15 years. China did not have the technical capabilities to make the design work in the early 1980's. Song Wencong (chief designer of J-10 and architect of the J-20 program) was a young engineer working in the program back then and he took inspiration from it in his later works.

J-9 (Jianjiji-9 Fighter aircraft 9)

The J-9, built by Chengdu Aircraft Corporation, never entered production. The single engine, delta canard design was cancelled in 1980, but the aerodynamic research in the program paved the way for the J-10 and J-20.

www.globalsecurity.org

South Korea MIG 1.44

 

[White and Green with M/S]

I wouldn't call them French designs though.

Than you're in delusional. PLA knows these French based designs

 

[etylo]

Than you're in delusional. PLA knows these French based designs

They have French and Euro origins. You are whack head.

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

So Z-8/Z-9/Z-11 are not French based designs???

look. South Korea MIG 1.44

Don't be too sad. South Korea is also a replicator and assembler. Like you.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

They have French and Euro origins. You are whack head.

That is I'm saying these helicopters are based on French designs

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

That is I'm saying these helicopters are based on French designs

Still better than you guys copying MIG 1.44. A group of poor assemblers. LOL.

 

[etylo]

That is I'm saying these helicopters are based on French designs

Not French designs in productions, but own derivatives from the origins.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

look. South Korea MIG 1.44

View attachment 928631

View attachment 928633

Don't be too sad. South Korea is also a replicator and assembler. Like you.

I'm saying it a part of development cycle where lots of designs can be studied


And tell me does Koreans chose this design for production??

look. South Korea MIG 1.44

View attachment 928631

View attachment 928633

Don't be too sad. South Korea is also a replicator and assembler. Like you.

I'm saying it a part of development cycle where lots of designs can be studied


And tell me does Koreans chose this design for production??

 

[S10]

It is possible that both design institutions cooperated each other to design J20 And CAC have known to have relationship with mikoyan

I would strongly advise you not to speak on matters you know nothing about. CAC was founded in 1970 by a team from SAC. At that time the Sino-Soviet split already happened, so no technical assistance or exchange was held with the Soviets. After relationship warmed in late 1980's, it was SAC that dealt with Sukhoi and Mikoyan, while CAC has developed their unique designs based on delta canard layouts (J-9, J-10, J-20) that split from Russian designs.

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

I'm saying it a part of development cycle where lots of designs can be studied


And tell me does Koreans chose this design for production??


I'm saying it a part of development cycle where lots of designs can be studied


And tell me does Koreans chose this design for production??

A group of assemblers copied MIG 1.44. lol

As I said. If you have too much extra time. Go do some basic work for your country.

I'm saying it a part of development cycle where lots of designs can be studied


And tell me does Koreans chose this design for production??


I'm saying it a part of development cycle where lots of designs can be studied


And tell me does Koreans chose this design for production??

of course. Finally, South Korea chose to copy F-22 and J-31. Poor assembler like you.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

I would strongly advise you not to speak on matters you know nothing about. CAC was founded in 1970 by a team from SAC. At that time the Sino-Soviet split already happened, so no technical assistance or exchange was held with the Soviets. After relationship warmed in late 1980's, it was SAC that dealt with Sukhoi and Mikoyan, while CAC has developed their unique designs based on delta canard layout (J-9, J-10, J-20).

What is the source of your crap

A group of assemblers copied MIG 1.44. lol

As I said. If you have too much extra time. Go do some basic work for your country.


of course. Finally, South Korea chose to copy F-22 and J-31. Poor assembler like you.

You're nothing to know about how aircraft project runs and I am in USA and don't insult my country if you won't stop I have more for your country

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

What is the source of your crap

or you can learn from South Korea to copy F-22 and J-31. Don't be like other assemblers who just copy MIG 1.44.

lol.

I'm curious. How much do these assemblers misunderstand their own aviation industry?

 

[S10]

What is the source of your crap

Read a book before spilling ignorant crap in the future:

株式会社エース / 2247-047　中国战斗机简史(中国航空工业史丛书)*

myace.jp

Amazon.ca Something Went Wrong / Quelque chose s'est mal passé

www.amazon.ca

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Read a book before spilling ignorant crap in the future:

株式会社エース / 2247-047　中国战斗机简史(中国航空工业史丛书)*

myace.jp

Amazon.ca Something Went Wrong / Quelque chose s'est mal passé

www.amazon.ca

CAC is known have a long relationship with MIKOYAN and. SAC is known to have a relationship with SUKOHI that's all I have to say

 

[S10]

CAC is known have a long relationship with MIKOYAN and. SAC is known to have a relationship with SUKOHI that's all I have to say

Repeating the same wrong statement over and over again does not make it a fact. How did CAC develop a "long relationship" with Mikoyan when the Sino-Soviet Split occurred in 1960 and CAC was founded in 1970?

Are you capable of temporal logic and basic reasoning?