What's new

China's missing India strategy could fall prey to US-Japan plot

arp2041

BANNED
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
10,406
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
India
The US and Japan were plotting to play China against India for strategic depth in the region, a government newspaper said on Monday, adding that Beijing needs to have a clear diplomatic strategy to engage with New Delhi and deter the “plot”. The usually stringently nationalistic Global Times’s Chinese version, part of the umbrella group of People’s Daily, further said that China doesn’t have clear strategy to deal with India, possibly because it doesn’t perceive its neighbour to be a threat.

It’s only New Delhi’s increasing closeness to Washington that has made Beijing sit up and take notice of its populous neighbour after the two signed the civil nuclear deal, the opinion piece seemed to indicate.

Expectedly, it referred to a controversial statement and new development to say that “China-India relations are currently undergoing positive changes”.

First, it referred to former army chief and Arunachal Pradesh governor General (retd) J. J. Singh’s comment that India should do away with its non-negotiable stand on the border dispute with China; and secondly, the article indicated that China was pleased that India had extracted itself out from exploring oil in the South China sea.

Written by Sun Peisong, head of the Jiangsu Lianyungang Research Institute, the timing of the piece was interesting: it coincides with Indian foreign minister SM Krishna’s short visit to Beijing, beginning Tuesday, as observer at the Shanghai Cooperation Summit.

In what seemed to be an unexpected gust of diplomatic optimism, Global Times said: “Indian does not have a history of militarism, and does not want to become a super power. In the international community, it is generally thought that India’s ambition is less than that of South Korea or Japan. So China has never considered India a threat, even though the 1998 nuclear explosion was said to be directed against China, China still does not consider India to be a real threat.”

But in spite of differences, it said: “For a long time, India has not figured as an important centre of Chinese foreign policy. China has not decided on a clear goal in its India policy. Now, the activity of Chinese military in the Indian Ocean has increased. The Indian Navy is also sailing more and more towards the East. The lack of mutual trust may lead to both sides adopting a wrong strategy.”

India, Sun said, has traditionally not flip-flopped between groups, but has sought political independence. “India’s not joining the US camp is beneficial to China. China and India should become friends.”

China's missing India strategy could fall prey to US-Japan plot - Hindustan Times
 
Evolve an India policy with clear goals: Chinese daily to government - The Economic Times

Evolve an India policy with clear goals: Chinese daily to government


BEIJING: Ahead of External Affairs Minister S M Krishna's visit here tomorrow, an official Chinese daily has sought to strike a friendly note, asking the government to evolve a clear India policy considering that New Delhi has chosen political independence over allying with the US in the region.

'Huanqiu Shibao', the Chinese version of the hardline Global Times daily, run by the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC), said the Chinese government should evolve an India policy with "clear goals" to strengthen friendship.
:woot: :woot:

The policy, it said, should bear in mind New Delhi's independent foreign policy and its recent decision to pull out of South China Sea oil blocks exploration.

"For a long time, India has not figured as an important centre of Chinese foreign policy and China has not decided on a clear goal in its India policy," read a commentary in the paper.

"Now, the activity of the Indian military in the Indian Ocean has increased and the Indian Navy is also sailing more and more towards the east, lack of mutual trust may lead to both sides adopting a mistaken strategy", the write up titled 'China should have clear strategic goals towards India' said.

The article published in the daily, which is known for striking a nationalistic stand, comes a day before Krishna arrives here to take part in the China-backed Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, (SCO) in which India is an observer.

The summit is being held here on June 6-7. Also, the article comes two days after US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta's announcement in Singapore that US would be deploying 60 per cent of naval fleet in Asia Pacific, the backyard of China, which is currently grappling with a host of maritime tensions in South China Sea.

"Whether the Asia-Pacific strategy of the United States will be successful, will depend to a large degree on whether US can persuade important countries in this region to join in its return to Asia strategy," the article said.

But "unlike many Asian countries, who have expressed their keenness towards the US, India has not catered to America. India has traditionally not flip-flopped between groups, but has sought political independence.

"India's not joining the US camp is beneficial to China. China and India should become friends," it said.


It pointed out that India does not have a history of "militarism" and does not want to become a "super power".

Evolve an India policy with clear goals: Chinese daily to government - The Economic Times
 
Well, Manmohan Singh said that China is trying to keep India "off-balance".

And apparently it is working: BBC News - Is the India growth story over?

Is that not a strategy? The Global Times will always find something to complain about.

China may or may not be trying to put india off balance by supporting Pakistan and arming them.But to equate that to reduction in indian economic growth rate is simply idiotic.
I think the real problem here is is a chinese newspaper calling for better relation with india does not fare well with war mongering chinese idiots here and elsewhere in internet.Bashing india is the only way for them to vent their frustration of having to live in a dictatorship where one cant even talk against forced sterlization by govt.
 
I don't think China and India have too many disputes, the only problems that India faces is the strong stance China takes to handle this disputes and the Pakistani angle of course.
 
China may or may not be trying to put india off balance by supporting Pakistan and arming them.But to equate that to reduction in indian economic growth rate is simply idiotic.
I think the real problem here is is a chinese newspaper calling for better relation with india does not fare well with war mongering chinese idiots here and elsewhere in internet.Bashing india is the only way for them to vent their frustration of having to live in a dictatorship where one cant even talk against forced sterlization by govt.

Are you joking? :lol: The "Global Times" is one of the most nationalistic tabloids in China.

It has even been referred to as the "Fox News of China". Even the article in the OP mentions their stance in the very first paragraph.

And yes, the long term game is all about economics. It is the oldest trick in the book, keep your opponent spending on foreign weapons, while you build up your long-term domestic capabilities.
 
Are you joking? :lol: The "Global Times" is one of the most nationalistic tabloids in China.

It has even been referred to as the "Fox News of China". Even the article in the OP mentions their stance in the very first paragraph.

And yes, the long term game is all about economics. It is the oldest trick in the book, keep your opponent spending on foreign weapons, while you build up your long-term domestic capabilities.

Agree dude, India is spending billions on Agni, aircraft carrier, Tejas, warships etc etc using technology bought from the best, unlike China. :)
 
Make Chinese Dragon the head of the department to make an India policy . He will declare war on india the next day .:lol:

You may be surprised to know that I am not in favour of war with India. :azn: (Or with any country for that matter).

National strategy is on a grand scale, encompassing all factors. If you are forced into fighting, that means all other methods have failed.

Read Sun Zi: "It is best to win without fighting."
 
Agree dude, India is spending billions on Agni, aircraft carrier, Tejas, warships etc etc using technology bought from the best, unlike China. :)
Same weapons you mentioned are developed within India too....at present we have to buy to avoid any gap.......
 
china has an indian strategy: it is an independent, strong, prosperous pakistan.

but if indians thought of a chinese "strategy" as chinese paying them off and vying with nipponzi and angloa-americans to bid for indian "friendship"...my starting bid and maximum bid is the same: one penny.
 
Agree dude, India is spending billions on Agni, aircraft carrier, Tejas, warships etc etc using technology bought from the best, unlike China. :)

And you really think that is a good idea?

Sending billions of dollars overseas, into the economies of rich nations? Instead of spending those billions on your own economy, and putting that money into your own indigenous industries?

Now the results are clear. Not only is China's economy stronger, but we are even able to independently produce our own 5-th generation fighters, as well as creating new weapons platforms like our ASBM Carrier killer missile.

India on the other hand, has to import even ammunition from overseas.
 
And you really think that is a good idea?

Sending billions of dollars overseas, into the economies of rich nations? Instead of spending those billions on your own economy, and putting that money into your own indigenous industries?

Now the results are clear. Not only is China's economy stronger, but we are even able to independently produce our own 5-th generation fighters, as well as creating new weapons platforms like our ASBM Carrier killer missile.

India on the other hand, has to import even ammunition from overseas.

i hope you are mentioning APFSDS rounds or some other tank rounds,if you are talking about rifle rounds,you are wrong..
 

Back
Top Bottom