What's new

'Gwadar port handover to China is against constitution'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Invincible INDIAN

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
1,166
Reaction score
-1
Gwadar port handover to China is against constitution

The provincial governor Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi said the benefits of Gwadar Port should first be given to the people of Balochistan

F498FEE5F1F4F102B17E3D38EAC50.jpg


Islamabad: Livid over Islamabad's decision to hand over the financially struggling Gwadar port to a Chinese company, Baloch leaders are now turning to the Constitution to drive their point home. A spokesperson for the Balochistan government referred to a previous statement by provincial governor Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi, who said that the benefits of the Gwadar Port should first be given to the people of Balochistan, reports The Express Tribune. He added that under the Constitution, the federal government controls ports in the country, including Gwadar Port. When the 18th Amendment was made to the Constitution in 2010, the provinces were given more powers.

But for matters that were important for the federation or the country as a whole, such as ports and shipping or water, a Council of Common Interests (CCI) would make decisions, the paper stated. Baloch leaders are now referring to Article 154 (1) of the Constitution that lists federal matters that should be taken up by the council. The defunct Baloch Republican Party (BRP), led by Brahamdagh Bugti, and Balochistan National Party-Awami headed by federal minister Mir Israrullah Zehri also resent the move without taking the government of Balochistan into confidence.

Dr Bashir Azeem, a spokesperson for Bugti, said the federal government did not consider it essential to consult the Baloch people before taking this decision. It didn't even bother to seek advice from the so-called nationalists who are its ruling allies, he added. Dr Azeem said that the federal government has once again established that it will continue to exploit the natural resources of the Baloch people for Islamabad. He further said that the BRP will never compromise on the economic rights of the already deprived people of Balochistan.

http://news.in.msn.com/international/‘gwadar-port-handover-to-china-is-against-constitution’
 
It is a matter for the Supreme Court to decide.




PS Indian members are not to start threads about Pakistan's internal affairs, violation of rule.
 
can you refute what is being said , or do you wish to just live in denial to any thing which does not suit you thought process?

Its our internal matter Indian interest in Gawadar is senseless.
Indians collecting bits and pieces to convince us its was wrong decision. :lol:
 
It is a matter for the Supreme Court to decide.
PS Indian members are not to start threads about Pakistan's internal affairs, violation of rule.

It has been portrayed as a potential threat to India hence its not just a internal matter.
 
According to Law of Pakistan Ports come under Federal Govt.......

Indians should keep there Farting A$$ out of this matter......
 
It has been portrayed as a potential threat to India hence its not just a internal matter.
Yup, China is building a nuke facility there with navy/airforce base, what a reason to get yourself wet :police:
 
Against the constitution?-
Time to change the constitution-:pakistan::china:-
 
Good, people raising their voice.
 
agar yehi provincial autonomy india mein de di na tu india sirf tukroon mein milay ga! dont forget your inter-provincial enmity and jealousy! you people are trying to control it centrally! and we dont forget that Indians are sending baloch insurgents in Pakistan that got trained in your 6 embassies in Afghanistan on the border of AFPAK(the durand line).
 
It has been portrayed as a potential threat to India hence its not just a internal matter.

The relations of friendly cooperation between our two countries(pak-china) does not rest upon the "Indian's FEELING",but upon (pak-china) benefit, friendship and loyalty.

Indian are not going to gossiping about this and that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom