What's new

"Imposing Modernity:" Cultural Genocide in Tibet

A for Anarchy

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Dharamshala: - Thupten Samphel, the secretary of the Department of Information and International Relations, members of the Director for the Tibetan Center of Human Rights and Democracy, and Anant Ashthana of the Delhi office of the Human Rights Law Network introduced their new book this morning (4th July). For "Imposing Modernity with Chinese Characteristics: The Fate of Tibetan Civilization," researchers conducted countless interviews with Tibetan refugees in order to examine the current cultural situation in Tibet.

Through using many direct quotes from Tibetan refugees, "Imposing Modernity" seeks to express the perceptions and opinions of the Tibetan people. Through research, study, and interviews, the book seeks to investigate why there is such opposition to development in the Tibetan region and why many Tibetans refuse to stay in China.

It concludes that "cultural genocide," defined as a system "whose purpose is to destroy, in whole or in part, a people's culture through various different procedures," is taking place. According to the authors, Chinese development in Tibet "has a definite strategy and scheme aimed at disassociating the Tibetan population from its identity, value spectrum, history and other cultural affiliations like language and literature."

"Imposing Modernity" examines the various ways in which cultural genocide has occurred in Tibet. The first is the 'development' of Tibet. The authors claim that China seeks to completely assimilate Han Chinese into Tibetan culture by encouraging mass immigration and displacing local populations. They also claim that part of this assimilation is designed in order to exploit Tibet's natural resources through industrial mining and large-scale timber operations.

The authors also claim that certain values intrinsic to Tibetan society have been taken out of education in Tibet, such as the Buddhist ideas of developing the heart and purifying the mind.

The decline of the Tibetan language, with Chinese as the predominant language of instruction in schools, business, and, increasingly, general communication, is cited as another example of cultural genocide.

Examples related to religion and culture are also given; 90% of Tibet's monasteries have been destroyed, and Tibetans have been forces to "publicly denounce high religious leaders" and attend study sessions about Chinese communism. Tibetans have even been forced to go against the Buddhist teaching of not harming any living thing by forcibly fulfilling quotas of killing certain numbers of flies and dogs.

"Imposing Modernity" ends with an appeal to the international community regarding Tibet's development. The authors state that while sustainable development can ultimately benefit Tibet, Tibetans must be involved in the planning of projects, and be allowed to keep their own culture and customs alive. "They must, in short, be allowed a voice in determining their own future."

Ref: "Imposing Modernity:" Cultural Genocide in Tibet

The recent Crackdown on Tibetan writers who just documented what happened in 2008 is plain sad.


I invite the broadminded Chinese (who would not troll) to explain why the state imposes such hardline policies when it comes to Tibetans.

---------- Post added at 12:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 AM ----------

Beijing asserts that it allows Tibetans religious freedom yet it limits the number of monks and nuns allowed to enter Tibetan monasteries, supervises the selection of religious leaders, and limits the size of prayer gathering which they fear will generate anti-government demonstrations. Monasteries and temples are exploited as tourist attractions. Many monasteries are run by the Beijing-controlled Democratic Management Committees through monks selected on the basis of their pro-China views.

Monks are required to swear allegiance to local Communist party authorities. As part of the "patriotic education" campaign monks and nuns are required to renounce the Dalai Lama and not allowed to keep his photographs. In the 1990s, monks and nuns who refused to denounce the Dalai Lama were purged of their positions in Tibetan monasteries. Some were defrocked and imprisoned.

Religious teachings deemed politically sensitive are banned. In some places Mao posters have been placed where portraits of the Dalai Lama once hung and people have been jailed for as long as six years for having a photo of the Dalai Lama. There have been reports of the government sending prostitutes to monasteries to get monks to break their vows of celibacy.

Tibetan students who study in Tibet and Tibetans who work for the government have been prohibited at least since 1996 from practicing Buddhism. Tibetan monks are often refused admission into Chinese run hotels.

The phrase ‘parent of all gods’ entered the news during the crisis in Tibet, when the ‘autonomous region's’ party secretary declared that the Communist Party was the ‘real Buddha’ for Tibetans. A report issued by London-based Tibet Watch in December 2007 asserted that religious repression was worsening in Tibet, saying that Beijing was: 1) building large police stations near monasteries; 2) limiting the number of monks and nuns; and 3) requiring them to take an exam to prove their loyalty.

The director of Tibet Watch said, “Monks have also told us of returning to monasteries that are more like museums and having money donated for upkeep of monasteries snatched by Chinese authorities.” A nun told Tibet Watch that when Chinese soldiers found she was wearing a picture of the Dalai Lama and she refused to give it up, “”The soldiers rushed over and beat me...I was punched and kicked and blood was spouting from my mouth.”


Religious Tolerance in Tibet

The Dalai Lama told Newsweek, "Superficially, there is some religious freedom. Simple things, like prostration and carrying a rosary, are allowed. But there are restrictions on serious practice." Photographs of the Dalai Lama are now allowed in many places (but not Lhasa). Even so police poke around monasteries, measuring the size and placement of photos of the Dalai Lama and tear them down if something is perceived as wrong.

The government generally has no objection to Tibetans erecting new stupas and repairing old monasteries as long as they pay for it themselves. The High Lama of Lobsang is permitted by the Communist government to put on his official robes for one week a year, during the spring festival celebrating the Chinese New Year.

See Labrang Monastery

For some Chinese, Tibetan culture has become kind of hip. They read Tibetan Buddhist texts; make offerings at Tibetan temples in Lhasa; and seek blessings and the touch of the Dalai Lama. Some say this is so because the lives of Chinese are spiritually empty. Other say it is because it is fashionable in Hollywood. Yet others say it because Tibetan Buddhism is associated with Tantric sex.

Chinese Rules and Monks


Notice banning prayer flags in Darlag The Chinese government bans monastic education before the age of 18. The government justifies this policy by arguing that monasteries only teach religion and the Tibetan language and students need a complete education with sciences, the Chinese language and math. Many parents ignore the law and quietly send their sons off to monasteries for religious training. Senior monks have said that after attending regular schools for nine years many young Tibetans don’t want to become monks.

In many monasteries monks are not allowed to watch DVDs, surf the Internet or use cell phones in accordance with Beijing rules. They are told that pictures of the Dalai Lama are banned and reminded not to listen to what people outside China say.

Monasteries have been ordered to stop holding public teachings and are required to allow the Chinese government to conduct classes. One monk in Shigatse told the Washington Post, “We have enough to eat and enough clothes, but our spirits are heavy. There are political education classes every Tuesday and Friday now, and everyone is scared. We can’t even trust our senior monks.”

Foreign tourists have described undercover monks at some of the monasteries they have visited. One American couple told Lonely Planet that they gave one monk at Tashilhunpo monastery in Shigatse some tapes of speeches by the Dalai Lama. Later the couple was picked up by police, with the “monk” on hand to identify them. They were interrogated at police station and had their hotel room searched. Possessions connected to the Dalai Lama were confiscated.

Re-education Classes for Monks

In recent years regular re-education classes have become part of monastic life in Tibet. Three times between 1999 and 2008 monks were required to take “patriotic education” classes in which they studied China policies and wrote statements denouncing the Dalai Lama.

A monk at the Dege printing factory told National Geographic, “Fifteen times a year, Chinese officials visit the monasteries and conduct ‘patriotic education’ Each class lasts two or three hours. Basically they tell the monks the Dalai Lama is evil and that he wants to split the motherland. The monks must pretend to listen, but most manage to block it out by chanting silently to themselves.”

In recent years regular re-education classes have been stepped up. Attendance is mandatory—unless a monk is sick and then a letter from a doctor is necessary be excused from the class.

The re-education classes used to take place once or twice a month then they were increased to once or twice a week. Now at some monasteries they occur almost daily. One monk told the Times of London that in the morning, “We gather in the main hall and Communist Party officials deliver a speech telling us to be patriotic and they give each monk a paper to read.” In the afternoon the monks return to answer questions related to the paper. “Usually, it’s pretty relaxed. If I can’t remember my answers, then I just repeat the same as the monks in front of me.”

“Sometimes it turns more serious. That is when the police arrive. They may stand beside each monk listening carefully to make sure each answer is correct. If the police come we have to lie. We have to say, ‘I love the motherland. I don’t love him.’ They don’t require you to explain who ‘him’ is, because we all know.”

The answer for one question on a re-education test for Buddhist nuns and monks is: "The Dalai is 'the head of the serpent and the chieftain of the separatist organization conspiring for independence in Tibet" and "the root cause of social instability in Tibet."

Imprisoned Monks

See Tibet Under China, History, Tibet

In 1997, Chadrel Rinpoche, a high-ranking lama and abbot of Tashilhunpo was sentenced to six years in prison for "splitting the country" and leaking state secrets (leaking information on Beijing's choice for the Panchen Lama). Chadrel Rinpoche had previously been accused of being a Beijing puppet. In 1994 he received an award for turning Tashilhunpo monastery into a "Resplendent Model of Safeguarding the Motherland by Displaying the Spirit of Patriotism."

In 2002, a 52-year-old monk, Tenzin Delek Rinpoche, was sentenced to death in a closed trial on charges that he was involved the the bombing of a pubic park. In 2005, his sentence was commuted to life. A younger man, Lobsang Dondup, described as an assistant to Tenzin Deleg, was charged in the same crime and executed the same day his appeal was denied. Both men had claimed they were innocent. Their trials were regarded as shams. Tenzin Delek was a popular monk based at the Litang Monastery in Sichuan. Some say he was framed because of his pro-independence views, large following, support of the Dalai Lama and unwillingness to do what Beijing told him to do. Lobsang had little connection to him.

A 30-year-old monk arrested on suspicion of engaging in separatist activities was beaten so badly while in jail he was "brain damaged and paralyzed" when he was released.

At Rongbo, a 500-monk monastery in Qinghai Province known as a "separatist hotbed," monks have been routinely arrested.


Text Sources: New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Times of London, National Geographic, The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Reuters, AP, Lonely Planet Guides, Compton’s Encyclopedia and various books and other publications.

ref: RELIGIOUS REPRESSION IN TIBET - China | Facts and Details
 
For "decline" of the Tibetan Language to occur, there must be a Tibetan language in the first place, being taught in instruction. There indeed are government schools where the 1st language of instruction is Tibetan, and then as the children move up, Chinese is introduced.

On the other hand, the US regime, a so called "multicultural" country, does not have Spanish, German or Chinese medium schools that give recognized degrees and receive government funding despite these 3 being the largest 3 ethnic groups in the US. Instead, the top 10% Anglo-Jewish descendants impose English over the 50 million Hispanic, 30 million German and 5 million Asians in the US. This can only mean that the US is not actually multicultural, but the true cultural genocider that has destroyed the culture of native Americans, German-Americans, Hispanics and Chinese-Americans.
 
If, by "broadminded" Chinese you mean Western stooges eager to endorse Western propaganda, you will be deeply disappointed. Western mouthpieces, whatever their facades, have no credibility with us. It may be gospel to you but to us it is certainly not worth the paper it's written on. Demonization of China isn't anything new. We Chinese just take it in stride and with a sneer.
 
It is China's internal affair,why westerners always mentioned and not really interested in and care for.

People care about People

For "decline" of the Tibetan Language to occur, there must be a Tibetan language in the first place, being taught in instruction. There indeed are government schools where the 1st language of instruction is Tibetan, and then as the children move up, Chinese is introduced.

On the other hand, the US regime, a so called "multicultural" country, does not have Spanish, German or Chinese medium schools that give recognized degrees and receive government funding despite these 3 being the largest 3 ethnic groups in the US. Instead, the top 10% Anglo-Jewish descendants impose English over the 50 million Hispanic, 30 million German and 5 million Asians in the US. This can only mean that the US is not actually multicultural, but the true cultural genocider that has destroyed the culture of native Americans, German-Americans, Hispanics and Chinese-Americans.

True that. But it still did not stop people from practising what they believed. We are not talking about inclusion, rather about exclusion. Inclusion is something that cannot be helped, exclusion and discrimination; and coercion based on culture/ethnic to follow another culture is a dirty game


If, by "broadminded" Chinese you mean Western stooges eager to endorse Western propaganda, you will be deeply disappointed. Western mouthpieces, whatever their facades, have no credibility with us. It may be gospel to you but to us it is certainly not worth the paper it's written on. Demonization of China isn't anything new. We Chinese just take it in stride and with a sneer.

Sneer all you want. You are still screwing people around. You are not satisfying the West by trying to keep the Tibetans happy. Please know that they are people too.
 
Introducing technology to areas of the country is a national right. If the Han people bring their computers and technology there, who's there to stop them?

Same thing with Han people migrating there. Who has the right to stop these people from moving there? It is every person's right to move where he or she wants.

Chinese law applies to every single citizen, not just Tibetans or Hans. If the Tibetans are the only group that whines and kills people for it, then so be it. The West speak as if they want us to only listen to 0.3% of the population at the cost of ignoring the other 99.7%. Why does the Western media impose such biased and sometimes false views on the Chinese?
 
The title is laughable. You can't impose modernity. It will happened sooner or later even with out imposition. Tibet will have a bunch of McDonalds and Starbucks too.

Even China was force to move forward or left in the dust bin of history like the Native people around the world.

I say China need to learn from the West in dealing with this. Exile Tibetan thinks that it can prevent the tide of history starting from Western colonialism, they are really delusional.
 
People care about People



True that. But it still did not stop people from practising what they believed. We are not talking about inclusion, rather about exclusion. Inclusion is something that cannot be helped, exclusion and discrimination; and coercion based on culture/ethnic to follow another culture is a dirty game




Sneer all you want. You are still screwing people around. You are not satisfying the West by trying to keep the Tibetans happy. Please know that they are people too.


History repeats itself no? The colonization of America and Australia caused even greater impact on the native societies and worse if compared to Tibet, but here is the west hollering about Tibet. Funny thing is the Europeans complain far less then America despite them having a better moral standing.

Have you seen the impact of American, British and Australian "tourism" on poorer SEA countries? Literally turned small towns into sex towns. Or how the US demand for drugs has turned Mexico into a drug riddled violence infested countries. (Guess who supplies weapons to the Mexican drug cartels)

Cultural genocide can come in form of money, violence and soft influence or total ignorance, every country is responsible some stage for some form of cultural assimilation. So who is the west to judge??
 
Introducing technology to areas of the country is a national right. If the Han people bring their computers and technology there, who's there to stop them?

Same thing with Han people migrating there. Who has the right to stop these people from moving there? It is every person's right to move where he or she wants.

Chinese law applies to every single citizen, not just Tibetans or Hans. If the Tibetans are the only group that whines and kills people for it, then so be it. The West speak as if they want us to only listen to 0.3% of the population at the cost of ignoring the other 99.7%. Why does the Western media impose such biased and sometimes false views on the Chinese?

I do not think you have read one word of what is written inside other than the title.

@Asian American: The title is sarcastic - Please read the rest of the article.

@Anon: Nobody is saying what that was done in America was right. We are talking about the Present.

"Tourism" has everything to do visiting and going, rather than an invasion.
 
History repeats itself no? The colonization of America and Australia caused even greater impact on the native societies and worse if compared to Tibet, but here is the west hollering about Tibet. Funny thing is the Europeans complain far less then America despite them having a better moral standing.

Have you seen the impact of American, British and Australian "tourism" on poorer SEA countries? Literally turned small towns into sex towns. Or how the US demand for drugs has turned Mexico into a drug riddled violence infested countries. (Guess who supplies weapons to the Mexican drug cartels)

Cultural genocide can come in form of money, violence and soft influence or total ignorance, every country is responsible some stage for some form of cultural assimilation. So who is the west to judge??

That is true. White tourists use Cambodia and Thailand's underaged children as cheap fk toys that can be discarded at will. I feel sorry for those children who will never grow up to have a normal life.
 
@Anon: Nobody is saying what that was done in America was right. We are talking about the Present.

"Tourism" has everything to do visiting and going, rather than an invasion.

As I said history repeats itself, Roman empire left its mark, British left their mark, Chinese won't be the last. Nothing changes because greed is what makes mankind evolve. Regardless if its today, tomorrow or the future.

Tourism of a country without changing its culture is one thing, Tourism with intent that changed its culture is another thing. The only difference is that its a lot softer approach but nevertheless still obtains the same goal.

Just to add no-one knows for sure what happened in Tibet was it better or worse for the population especially with Serdom and feudalism where some of the people suffered horrifically under the upper echelon of society. But I can say for sure China and Tibet have long been intertwined, even the early emperors could write Tibetan script.

Unless you actually been there and know of what the history and current situation from the people its pretty hard to pass any kind of judgement that is non biased.
 
That is true. White tourists use Cambodia and Thailand's underaged children as cheap fk toys that can be discarded at will. I feel sorry for those children who will never grow up to have a normal life.

Please do not give me Tu quoque arguments or try to justify the atrocity committed in Tibet by what the "White man" is doing in Cambodia or Thailand.
 
That is true. White tourists use Cambodia and Thailand's underaged children as cheap fk toys that can be discarded at will. I feel sorry for those children who will never grow up to have a normal life.

I wouldn't go to the extent of that but I'm just using it as an example. Bottom line this is the reality of the world we face today
 
So you are using this as an excuse for what's going in Tibet?

Pathetic.

No I am just saying grow up and stop your pointing fingers around, if you want go there and petition or join a human rights protest and get there to do something. I know my stand and its more pathetic to see someone whining on the internet and not do anything.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom