What's new

Japanese furious at Chinese addressing of Okinawa as "Ryukyu Autonomous Reg

Status
Not open for further replies.
:coffee: Good evening, Mr Bush.
1# China is not a democracy country, we refuse to vote.
2# What can you contribute to the great anti-China alliance? 1.2 billion hungry people?

to be fair, that's 1.1 billion :agree:

---------- Post added at 11:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:45 PM ----------

Is that all you could muster?

wrong again !

come back tomorow.
 
learn some knowlage about Ryuukyuu kingdom and Ryuukyuu independent movement

illiterate people got crazy about any fake news :lol:

阿三米有文化 表理它们

have a mercy on stunted people, mate.
 
to be fair, that's 1.1 billion :agree:

---------- Post added at 11:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:45 PM ----------



wrong again !

come back tomorow.

It is pathetic that you not even able come up with a reasonable retort to any of the posts on this thread ..but your ego is hurting so much, that got to write some crap..or whatever eases the pain.. hunh?
 
It's funny how the Indians here assume that all Chinese wishes for Indian democracy. They don't; it fails to feed its people. And democracy isn't even Indian, it's Western at best.

PS: Western democracies were brought to Asian countries through either colonization or occupation. India is no different. It should be a national disgrace to embrace Wester democracy as it was your British fathers who taught the idea to you in the first place.

I loled after penning this.

PS2: You can't counter diss me or Canada, as my country and I are dissidents of the very people who ruled your nation for 10 generations.
 
I feel as if the chinese propaganda establishment is getting much too over confident.

because we have to match up with the western propaganda establishment! care enough to educate urself on the history of Okinawa?
 
Oh, more anti-Chinese propaganda from the Japanese media. There are some ppl on the internet want Okinawa to be an autonomous region, so what? There are a lot more people on the internet calling for KMT to retake mainland. Some people really need to grow a tougher skin.
 
A bit off topic but posts on this thread, especially from our Indian friends, made me to think the question "Are all democracies created equal?" I think not. Too many Indian friends here assume if a country has a multi-party election system then its democracy and its the best political system in the world and so on so forth. This is simply far from truth.

Personally I don't even think the typical American style democracy is the best form of governance anyway. American's highly individualism based democracy only provides half of the freedom - mainly freedom to choose and protection from prosecution for being different (individualism); however it does not provide the other half of the freedom - freedom to access such as free healthcare, eduction, job and housing. In contrast communism gives you the freedom to access without the freedom of choice, so in my opinion the best system should be a system that can provide a balance between these two. Personally I think a single party system based on collectivism with freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom of political expression in addition to a strong socialist supporting system (free healthcare, free high education, and affordable housing among others) would be a nice system.

This might be sounded like too good to be true, but I think China is well positioned to eventually transform into something like that.

BTW, I think, if to be very technical, China's current system is actually pretty close to a parliamentary democracy system.
 
A bit off topic but posts on this thread, especially from our Indian friends, made me to think the question "Are all democracies created equal?" I think not. Too many Indian friends here assume if a country has a multi-party election system then its democracy and its the best political system in the world and so on so forth. This is simply far from truth.

Personally I don't even think the typical American style democracy is the best form of governance anyway. American's highly individualism based democracy only provides half of the freedom - mainly freedom to choose and protection from prosecution for being different (individualism); however it does not provide the other half of the freedom - freedom to access such as free healthcare, eduction, job and housing. In contrast communism gives you the freedom to access without the freedom of choice, so in my opinion the best system should be a system that can provide a balance between these two. Personally I think a single party system based on collectivism with freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom of political expression in addition to a strong socialist supporting system (free healthcare, free high education, and affordable housing among others) would be a nice system.

This might be sounded like too good to be true, but I think China is well positioned to eventually transform into something like that.

BTW, I think, if to be very technical, China's current system is actually pretty close to a parliamentary democracy system.

democracy means power in the hands of people and to utilise the democracy,ppl must know their rights:D
and for which education is necessary
 
democracy means power in the hands of people and to utilise the democracy,ppl must know their rights:D
and for which education is necessary

this is very vague explaination of democracy! people not only must know their rights but most importantly their responsibilities and obligations as well which are plaid down by western powers especially when trying to impose their value to other nations.

thats one of the reasonss Chinese people like the idea of impartiality and human rights as much as others, but when we hear western people shouting with the 'big' word 'democracy we feel irritated. becuae most of them have no idea what they r talking about. this applies to some of the india friends here as well.

we chinese believe in balance between the state and people. individualism is wonderful, and by any means chinese civilization always embrace that. but what makes us different from the west is that we understand the meaning of compromising small for big.
 
It's funny how the Indians here assume that all Chinese wishes for Indian democracy. They don't; it fails to feed its people. And democracy isn't even Indian, it's Western at best.

PS: Western democracies were brought to Asian countries through either colonization or occupation. India is no different. It should be a national disgrace to embrace Wester democracy as it was your British fathers who taught the idea to you in the first place.

I loled after penning this.

PS2: You can't counter diss me or Canada, as my country and I are dissidents of the very people who ruled your nation for 10 generations.

No Indian claims that chinease wishes for "Indian" democracy or "american" democracy.
But every self respecting people(even arabs now) want it now, at least in its very basic form.
There is nothing to be ashamed to copy an western idea, if it is good for us, and considered best practice in almost all continents.
I did not understand PS2, what do you mean you are "dissidents" of people who ruled India for 10 generations.

A dissident, broadly defined, is a person who actively challenges an established doctrine, policy, or institution.

Whom did you challenge?
 
zoochee, welcome to the forum!

I don't get it what's it with the Chinese in Canada, as most people from there in the forum seem to live in a la la land...a suicidal PC product of multi culti Canadian time bomb must be? :D

You'll soon find out talking democracy to the Indians in this forum, at least in formal way you do, is like discussing Tsjaikovski with Somalia pirates...:lol:
 
It's funny how the Indians here assume that all Chinese wishes for Indian democracy. They don't; it fails to feed its people. And democracy isn't even Indian, it's Western at best.

PS: Western democracies were brought to Asian countries through either colonization or occupation. India is no different. It should be a national disgrace to embrace Wester democracy as it was your British fathers who taught the idea to you in the first place.

I loled after penning this.

PS2: You can't counter diss me or Canada, as my country and I are dissidents of the very people who ruled your nation for 10 generations.

First Indians don't assume all Chinese want democracies - just the majority. But unfortunately it also means death to them if they speak up. We seen how your govt handles protests.

why would we diss Canada? it's great country that opens its arms and gives freedom to folks like you to spew you stuff. Tell us can we go to your China and be allowed to do the same?

irony is that its the western economies that feeds your country... for China to survive it needs those democracies. you should be ashamed given you stance on western democracies that your people are sold and bought by those economies .

I LOL'ed seeing you reside in canada and reading a statement like " It should be a national disgrace to embrace Wester democracy "-

It's like the circus clown dissing the circus acts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom