What's new

JF-17 Picture for Military Aviation?

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
JF-17 Picture for Military Aviation?

Currently Military Aviation displaying F-16 jets, what about replacing F-16 with JF-17


JF-17_landing.jpg


:pakistan::pakistan::pakistan::pakistan:
 
Mr Sri Lankan if u have no knowledge about jf-17 thunder than please don't publish incorrect information about jf-17 project
PAF wants to replace its f-7pg,mirages III/V with jf-17 thunder
not replacing withf-16
f-16 is our back-bone
but our are collecting more f-16s from USA.
 
Mr Sri Lankan if u have no knowledge about jf-17 thunder than please don't publish incorrect information about jf-17 project
PAF wants to replace its f-7pg,mirages III/V with jf-17 thunder
not replacing withf-16
f-16 is our back-bone
but our are collecting more f-16s from USA.

I believe he is talking about the display picture of the F-16 pasted beside the Military Aviation section, to be replaced by the JF-17 picture.

He is not talking about PAF replacing its F-16s with JF-17s practically, just the display pic.
 
Mr Sri Lankan if u have no knowledge about jf-17 thunder than please don't publish incorrect information about jf-17 project
PAF wants to replace its f-7pg,mirages III/V with jf-17 thunder
not replacing withf-16
f-16 is our back-bone
but our are collecting more f-16s from USA.

nomi sb, srilankan is saying that just replace pic of f-16 with jf-17, just for display not replace whole fleet of falcons with thunders.
 
Good Idea :)
Replace that display pic with JF-17 :smitten:
 
Mr Sri Lankan if u have no knowledge about jf-17 thunder than please don't publish incorrect information about jf-17 project
PAF wants to replace its f-7pg,mirages III/V with jf-17 thunder
not replacing withf-16
f-16 is our back-bone
but our are collecting more f-16s from USA.

PAF Plan for 2015
~100 F-16
~150 JF-17
~ 36 J-10B
~ 50 F-7PG
~100 Mirage ROSE

Source 1
Source 2

JF-17 defense mode activate. :rofl:

You guys really need actually read the OP first rather than a few lines.
 
I like the idea - JF-17 should be shown to have the lead role and the F16 a supporting role, somewhere in the background
 

Back
Top Bottom