What's new

Pakistan: The Next Electronics Manufacturing Hub?

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States

Soaring demand for consumer electronics and low labor costs are attracting major global smartphone manufacturers like Samsung to Pakistan. In 2021, local manufacturers produced 25 million handsets, up a whopping 88% increase from 13 million produced in 2020. A key factor credited for this rapid production ramp-up is the new Mobile Device Manufacturing Policy announced and implemented by former Prime Minister Imran Khan's government in 2020. It imposes high tariffs on the import of mobile phone sets and offers tax rebates for local manufacturing. The policy set a 49% localization target by June 2023, including 10% localization of components on the motherboard and 10% localization of batteries. Pakistan is forecast to be the world's 7th largest consumer market by 2030. The key to attracting more manufacturing in Pakistan lies in continuation of policies and a measure of political stability.

The local manufacturing plants have assembled 14.08 million mobile phone handsets in the first six months (January-June) of 2022, while imports declined to 1.14 million handsets, according to the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA). Implementation of Device Identification Registration and Blocking System (DIRBS) and conducive government policies including the Mobile Device Manufacturing Policy 2020 have created a favorable environment for mobile device manufacturing in Pakistan.

In addition to Samsung, a number of Chinese mobile handset manufacturers are investing in Pakistan to ramp up local production. Itel has manufactured 3.91 million mobile devices followed by VGO Tel's 2.97 million, Infinix 2.65 million, Vivo 2.45 million, Techno 1.87 million, QQMEE 0.86 million and Oppo 0.67 million. After the export of the first lot of 4G smartphones to the UAE in 2022, Pakistan has now set $1 billion target for mobile phone exports for the current fiscal year.

Pakistan wants to emulate Vietnam which has emerged as one of the leading countries in the assembly and export of smartphones and other consumer electronics devices in the past decade. Apple has recently moved part of its iPad manufacturing to Vietnam from China, where Covid lockdowns have disrupted supply chains. TRT World has recently quoted Quentin D’Silva, the head of Lucky's smartphone division in Pakistan, as saying, “It’s only in the last five to seven years that the smartphone business has mushroomed in developing countries like ours".

Related Links:

Haq's Musings

South Asia Investor Review

Unprecedented Tech Boom in Pakistan

State Bank of Pakistan Plans Digital Currency By 2025

Pakistan Broadband Subscriptions Pass 100 Million

Brothers From Rural Pakistan Teaching AI to American High Schoolers

Pakistan's Computer Services Exports Jump 26% Amid Coronavirus Lockdown

Pakistan Gig Economy Among World's Fastest Growing

Digital BRI and 5G in Pakistan

Pakistan's Demographic Dividend

Pakistan EdTech and FinTech Startups

State Bank Targets Fully Digital Economy in Pakistan

Campaign of Fear Against CPEC

Fintech Revolution in Pakistan

E-Commerce in Pakistan

2021: A Banner Year For Pakistani Tech Startups

FMCG Boom in Pakistan

Belt Road Forum 2019

Fiber Network Growth in Pakistan

Riaz Haq's Youtube Channel

PakAlumni: Pakistani Social Network


 
not going to happen unless we have consistent, investor friendly policies. Manufacturing needs cheap energy. Pakistan energy rates are highest in region.

If Imran Khan comes back and our military allows him to work, Pakistan can realize its true potential. Otherwise if army wants to keep playing with its corrupt political toys, who have no vision for country execpt to steal more money, Pakistan has no future. Army needs to be kicked out of country's political decisions.
 
not going to happen unless we have consistent, investor friendly policies. Manufacturing needs cheap energy. Pakistan energy rates are highest in region.

If Imran Khan comes back and our military allows him to work, Pakistan can realize its true potential. Otherwise if army wants to keep playing with its corrupt political toys, who have no vision for country execpt to steal more money, Pakistan has no future. Army needs to be kicked out of country's political decisions.
Most of the Asian tiger economies grew when the military and civilians were on the same page. 6% Grow for two years straight under PTI should have been a good start. Hope PTI and the military can sit down and work out a vision that can create a 25 year roadmap to growth. The kind of sacrifices the people will need to make to achieve the 9-10% sustainable year on year growth Pakistan can do over the next 25 years requires a popular civilian government the people are willing to follow, despite the hardships.

Btw, 9-10% adjusted for inflation is basically the world bank’s $2 Trillion GDP assessment of the Pakistani economy by 2047/2050 plus average inflation, if managed correctly.
 
Last edited:
Most of the Asian tiger economies grew when the military and civilians were on the same page. 6% Grow for two years straight under PTI should have been a good start. Hope PTI and the military can sit down and work out a vision that can create a 25 year roadmap to growth. The kind of sacrifices the people will need to make to achieve the 9-10% sustainable year on year growth Pakistan can do over the next 25 years requires a popular civilian government the people are willing to follow, despite the hardships.

Btw, 9-10% adjusted for inflation is basically the world banks $2 Trillion GDP assessment of the Pakistani economy by 2047/2050 plus average inflation, if managed correctly.

If our military leadership was this sincere, we sould have been Asian tiger long time ago. Its military which has been ruling the country directly or indirectly for last 75 years. Even after 75 years, we are still begging a billion or 2 dollars.
 
Implement a sweet blend of protectionist policies and subsidies to manufacturers and there’s no reason why Pakistan can’t be a manufacturing hub.

As long as we live by IMF’s rules though, you can neither have protectionist policies nor subsidies to manufacturers without the fiscal capacity.

Also there’s something that can be done regarding our consumer culture, government should run ads in Urdu on national television, caller tunes and what not explaining how buying imported stuff is detrimental to nation, and how it’s a patriotic thing to buy local, encouraging employment along the way. it won’t do much to our balance of payments because consumer imports don’t amount to anything significant but it will get companies like Unilever and P&G to shift more of their manufacturing to Pakistan. Remember that CJP Dam fund and how the country was pushed through patriotic jazbat to donate. A movement to buy made-in-Pakistan along the lines of that would do wonders.
 
Last edited:
Not without a dedicated, stable government

Most of the Asian tiger economies grew when the military and civilians were on the same page. 6% Grow for two years straight under PTI should have been a good start. Hope PTI and the military can sit down and work out a vision that can create a 25 year roadmap to growth. The kind of sacrifices the people will need to make to achieve the 9-10% sustainable year on year growth Pakistan can do over the next 25 years requires a popular civilian government the people are willing to follow, despite the hardships.

Btw, 9-10% adjusted for inflation is basically the world banks $2 Trillion GDP assessment of the Pakistani economy by 2047/2050 plus average inflation, if managed correctly.
Millitary and PTI need to be on the same page for Pak to progress
 
Implement a sweet blend of protectionist policies and subsidies to manufacturers and there’s no reason Pakistan can’t be a manufacturing hub.

As long as we live by IMF’s rules though, you can neither have protectionist policies nor subsidies to manufacturers without the fiscal capacity.
1659496593060.png
 
Neutrals don't want local manufacturing of any kind, per the instructions given to them by their Centcom bosses, local manufacturing engenders more involvement of China in the regional matters and as such the neutrals have brought back in the master importers of PMLN who will not only destroy local industry (textile export have already been pegged back by 10%) but rack up record imports particularly from neutrals' bosses' favorite regional sidekick India.
 
Last edited:
If our military leadership was this sincere, we sould have been Asian tiger long time ago. Its military which has been ruling the country directly or indirectly for last 75 years. Even after 75 years, we are still begging a billion or 2 dollars.

Pakistan's military-run enterprises need upgrade to revive economy
Corporate empire has potential to be globally competitive

By Uzair Younus


https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Pakistan-s-military-run-enterprises-need-upgrade-to-revive-economy

It is time to accept that rather than trying to cut this empire down to size, it may be more fruitful to develop Military Inc. 2.0: a corporate empire that is globally competitive.

Pakistan's military began playing a role in the economy soon after independence. The construction of the 805-km cross-border Karakoram Highway in the Himalayas was a major inflection point. The Frontier Works Organization was formed then with the mission to construct the highway on the Pakistani side.

Today, military-run organizations have their tentacles spread across the entire economy, with the military-owned Fauji Foundation being one of the largest conglomerates in the country. The government has exempted both the Army Welfare Trust and the Fauji Foundation from income taxes, giving them an edge over privately owned companies.

The military also operates housing developments across the country, with the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) a dominant force in the country's real estate sector. While the initial aim was to develop homes for serving and retired military personnel, DHA has since evolved into a multibillion-dollar entity with a presence in all major cities.

The military's economic footprint, however, is indicative of broader economic issues plaguing Pakistan. For decades, Pakistan's civilian and military elites have extracted wealth by engaging in highly protected, low-productivity sectors. As a result, Pakistani businesses are both globally uncompetitive and provide shoddy services to domestic consumers.

An example is the DHA project in Karachi, built on land reclaimed from the Arabian Sea. The predominant role enjoyed by the military meant that development of the DHA site occurred without proper access to proper stormwater drainage, resulting in multimillion-dollar homes, paid for in cash, routinely being flooded during monsoon rains.

Political volatility and instability have further compounded the problems, leading to an anemic rate of foreign direct investment, particularly in export-oriented sectors. The result: recurring balance of payments crises that require bailouts.

To emerge from this crisis, Pakistan's military must learn from its strategic ally China. While the Chinese regime also began with military-run organizations developing public infrastructure, over the decades, it has developed companies that have a more global outlook.

In addition, China focused on improving quality by leveraging technology while also investing in global best practices. This ensured that the country built globally competitive businesses that enhanced China's technological reach, such as telecommunications group Huawei Technologies.

Pakistan's military would do well to mimic China's strategy to become globally connected, competitive and innovative.

Such a reconfiguration may solve Pakistan's macroeconomic challenges and recurring external crises, as the military is finding it difficult to muster resources required to compete with an India that is growing at a faster pace and rapidly modernizing its military. This is tilting the balance of power in the region toward India, creating national security risks for Pakistan.

Critics will argue that reorienting the military's corporate empire will only worsen the challenges facing Pakistan's floundering democracy. This concern is valid, but Pakistan's growing economic challenges mean that it is time to prioritize sustainable growth and socioeconomic development.

Changing the military's corporate approach is likely to create the space for broader economic reforms that are urgently needed to end Pakistan's protracted economic decline.
 
Pakistan's military-run enterprises need upgrade to revive economy
Corporate empire has potential to be globally competitive

By Uzair Younus


https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Pakistan-s-military-run-enterprises-need-upgrade-to-revive-economy

It is time to accept that rather than trying to cut this empire down to size, it may be more fruitful to develop Military Inc. 2.0: a corporate empire that is globally competitive.

Pakistan's military began playing a role in the economy soon after independence. The construction of the 805-km cross-border Karakoram Highway in the Himalayas was a major inflection point. The Frontier Works Organization was formed then with the mission to construct the highway on the Pakistani side.

Today, military-run organizations have their tentacles spread across the entire economy, with the military-owned Fauji Foundation being one of the largest conglomerates in the country. The government has exempted both the Army Welfare Trust and the Fauji Foundation from income taxes, giving them an edge over privately owned companies.

The military also operates housing developments across the country, with the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) a dominant force in the country's real estate sector. While the initial aim was to develop homes for serving and retired military personnel, DHA has since evolved into a multibillion-dollar entity with a presence in all major cities.

The military's economic footprint, however, is indicative of broader economic issues plaguing Pakistan. For decades, Pakistan's civilian and military elites have extracted wealth by engaging in highly protected, low-productivity sectors. As a result, Pakistani businesses are both globally uncompetitive and provide shoddy services to domestic consumers.

An example is the DHA project in Karachi, built on land reclaimed from the Arabian Sea. The predominant role enjoyed by the military meant that development of the DHA site occurred without proper access to proper stormwater drainage, resulting in multimillion-dollar homes, paid for in cash, routinely being flooded during monsoon rains.

Political volatility and instability have further compounded the problems, leading to an anemic rate of foreign direct investment, particularly in export-oriented sectors. The result: recurring balance of payments crises that require bailouts.

To emerge from this crisis, Pakistan's military must learn from its strategic ally China. While the Chinese regime also began with military-run organizations developing public infrastructure, over the decades, it has developed companies that have a more global outlook.

In addition, China focused on improving quality by leveraging technology while also investing in global best practices. This ensured that the country built globally competitive businesses that enhanced China's technological reach, such as telecommunications group Huawei Technologies.

Pakistan's military would do well to mimic China's strategy to become globally connected, competitive and innovative.

Such a reconfiguration may solve Pakistan's macroeconomic challenges and recurring external crises, as the military is finding it difficult to muster resources required to compete with an India that is growing at a faster pace and rapidly modernizing its military. This is tilting the balance of power in the region toward India, creating national security risks for Pakistan.

Critics will argue that reorienting the military's corporate empire will only worsen the challenges facing Pakistan's floundering democracy. This concern is valid, but Pakistan's growing economic challenges mean that it is time to prioritize sustainable growth and socioeconomic development.

Changing the military's corporate approach is likely to create the space for broader economic reforms that are urgently needed to end Pakistan's protracted economic decline.
I fully agree with his pov, China(retired millitary personal) , Vietnam and couple other countries had millitary manufacturing companies

It's not perfect but when life gives you lemons you make lemonade

This is the best shot you got
 
I dunno but I find these smartphones fully crap and full of bloatware and unnecessary apps and shit you can’t even delete. Embedded ads for games etc. embedded tiktok, really? Seems like pushing their crap apps onto people….

Not to mention most only come in big sizes, there is hardly any small sized smartphones.

Too much tax wanted by PTA for iphones and androids purchased abroad….. its fucked up
 
Pakistan's military-run enterprises need upgrade to revive economy
Corporate empire has potential to be globally competitive

By Uzair Younus


https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Pakistan-s-military-run-enterprises-need-upgrade-to-revive-economy

It is time to accept that rather than trying to cut this empire down to size, it may be more fruitful to develop Military Inc. 2.0: a corporate empire that is globally competitive.

Pakistan's military began playing a role in the economy soon after independence. The construction of the 805-km cross-border Karakoram Highway in the Himalayas was a major inflection point. The Frontier Works Organization was formed then with the mission to construct the highway on the Pakistani side.

Today, military-run organizations have their tentacles spread across the entire economy, with the military-owned Fauji Foundation being one of the largest conglomerates in the country. The government has exempted both the Army Welfare Trust and the Fauji Foundation from income taxes, giving them an edge over privately owned companies.

The military also operates housing developments across the country, with the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) a dominant force in the country's real estate sector. While the initial aim was to develop homes for serving and retired military personnel, DHA has since evolved into a multibillion-dollar entity with a presence in all major cities.

The military's economic footprint, however, is indicative of broader economic issues plaguing Pakistan. For decades, Pakistan's civilian and military elites have extracted wealth by engaging in highly protected, low-productivity sectors. As a result, Pakistani businesses are both globally uncompetitive and provide shoddy services to domestic consumers.

An example is the DHA project in Karachi, built on land reclaimed from the Arabian Sea. The predominant role enjoyed by the military meant that development of the DHA site occurred without proper access to proper stormwater drainage, resulting in multimillion-dollar homes, paid for in cash, routinely being flooded during monsoon rains.

Political volatility and instability have further compounded the problems, leading to an anemic rate of foreign direct investment, particularly in export-oriented sectors. The result: recurring balance of payments crises that require bailouts.

To emerge from this crisis, Pakistan's military must learn from its strategic ally China. While the Chinese regime also began with military-run organizations developing public infrastructure, over the decades, it has developed companies that have a more global outlook.

In addition, China focused on improving quality by leveraging technology while also investing in global best practices. This ensured that the country built globally competitive businesses that enhanced China's technological reach, such as telecommunications group Huawei Technologies.

Pakistan's military would do well to mimic China's strategy to become globally connected, competitive and innovative.

Such a reconfiguration may solve Pakistan's macroeconomic challenges and recurring external crises, as the military is finding it difficult to muster resources required to compete with an India that is growing at a faster pace and rapidly modernizing its military. This is tilting the balance of power in the region toward India, creating national security risks for Pakistan.

Critics will argue that reorienting the military's corporate empire will only worsen the challenges facing Pakistan's floundering democracy. This concern is valid, but Pakistan's growing economic challenges mean that it is time to prioritize sustainable growth and socioeconomic development.

Changing the military's corporate approach is likely to create the space for broader economic reforms that are urgently needed to end Pakistan's protracted economic decline.
In a country like ours, no private business can have a competitive edge over Military Inc, for example, all commercial properties contracted, franchised or rented out under Military Inc ranging from McDonalds on Shahrah e Faisal to marriage lawns and shopping centres I see in Hyderabad have one thing in common, they are wonderfully built with sufficient parking spaces. This is a good thing until you realise if these were developed by private sector they would try to milk every square footage they had and we wouldn’t have parking spaces. All the Army Public schools are considerably larger than even the most expensive of private schools across our country. Why? land isn’t an issue for them.
There’s also other privileges that come with a military rank, the ability to get stuff done in this country, to cut through red tape is just a few of those privileges, dealing with zoning offices is a hectic thing if you are a citizen entrepreneur but a smooth ride if you are a Major.
dont you think a Military Inc with license to grow exponentially would be a de facto death certificate for private sector?
 
I fully agree with his pov, China(retired millitary personal) , Vietnam and couple other countries had millitary manufacturing companies

It's not perfect but when life gives you lemons you make lemonade

This is the best shot you got
Not just china Vietnam.it happens in West as well.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom