What's new

Pakistan's 'secret' war in Baluchistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brahamdagh Bugti seeks US, India help against Pakistan

* BRP chief says military operation being carried out only in Baloch-dominated areas

Daily Times Monitor

LAHORE: Baloch Republican Party chief Brahamdagh Bugti has appealed to the United States and India to help Baloch people against Pakistan, a private TV channel reported on Wednesday.

Talking to the channel, Bugti said, “We will welcome India’s help for the Baloch people.” Bugti told the channel that the military operation was being carried out only in those parts of Balochistan where the Baloch live while the areas where the Punjabis resided were “exempted”.

He said the Baloch were fighting for their rights, adding that the cruelties perpetrated on them were never highlighted by the media, the channel said.

“We do not recognise the Constitution of 1973. We only want freedom,” he added.

The channel quoted him as saying that Balochistan had never been considered a part of the country and “the Baloch people have always been considered as slaves”. He said they had been ‘forced’ to put up resistance against the usurpation of their rights.

“Isn’t it a wrong that the people of the very district from where gas is being explored have to use wood for fire while the facility of gas is available in every house in Punjab,” he said. He said no one had ever protested against the killing of the Baloch leaders and the wrong being done to the Baloch. He said the rulers wanted to take control of the resources of Balochistan by suppressing the Baloch people.

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
sir when we all knew about baluchistan problem and we knew that marri tribe leader khair bux marri and his family... Brahamdagh bughti are responble for all things in baluchistan and they are backed by indians then why dun we just finish them when start army operations at the time of akber bughti....sir if we love our country we have to finish them bcoz they not in pakistan favor plz relpy me. meri jaan meri shaan pakistan pakistan :pakistan:
 
Last edited:
With its “Islamic” nuclear bomb, Taliban- and al-Qaeda-infested borderlands, dysfunctional cities, and feuding ethnic groups, Pakistan may well be the world’s most dangerous country, a nuclear Yugoslavia-in-the-making. One key to its fate is the future of Gwadar, a strategic port whose development will either unlock the riches of Central Asia, or plunge Pakistan into a savage, and potentially terminal, civil war.

by Robert D. Kaplan
Pakistan’s Fatal Shore - The Atlantic (May 2009)

Photo by Reza/Webistan

kaplan-pakistan-wide.jpg


The word Pakistan summons up the Indian subcontinent, but the subcontinent actually begins with the Hub River, a few miles west of Karachi, near the Indus River Delta. Thus, Pakistan’s 400-mile-long Makran coast, which runs from the Iranian frontier eastward along the Arabian Sea, constitutes a vast transition zone that bears a heavy imprint of the Middle East and particularly of Arabia: directly across the Gulf of Oman is Muscat, the capital of Oman. This transition zone, which also includes the interior land adjacent to the coast, is known as Baluchistan. Through this alkaline wasteland, the 80,000-man army of Alexander the Great marched westward in its disastrous retreat from India in 325 B.C.

To travel the Makran coast is to experience the windy, liberating flatness of Yemen and Oman and their soaring, sawtooth ramparts the color of sandpaper, rising sheer off a desert floor pockmarked with thornbushes. Here, along a coast so empty that you can almost hear the echoing camel hooves of Alexander’s army, you lose yourself in geology. An exploding sea bangs against a knife-carved apricot moonscape of high sand dunes, which, in turn, gives way to crumbly badlands. Farther inland, every sandstone and limestone escarpment is the color of bone. Winds and seismic and tectonic disruptions have left their mark in tortuous folds and uplifts, deep gashes, and conical incrustations that hark back far before the age of human folly.

Drive along this landscape for hours on end and the only sign of civilization you’ll encounter is the odd teahouse: a partly charred stone hut with jute charpoys, where you can buy musty, Iranian-packaged biscuits and strongly brewed tea. Baluch tribesmen screech into these road stops driving old autos and motorcycles, wearing Arab head scarves, speaking in harsh gutturals, and playing music whose rumbling rhythms, so unlike the introspective twanging ragas of the subcontinent, reverberate with the spirit of Arabia.

But don’t be deceived by the distance that separates the Makran coast from teeming Karachi and Islamabad to the east. Pakistan exists here, too. The highway from Karachi to the Iranian border area is a good one, with only a few broken patches still to be paved. The government operates checkpoints. It is developing major air and naval bases to counter India’s projection of power into the Indian Ocean. And it has high hopes of using new ports on the Makran coast to unlock trade routes to the markets and energy supplies of Central Asia. The Pakistani government might not control the desert and mountain fastnesses of Baluchistan, with their rebellious and smuggling tribes and dacoits, or bandits. But it can be wherever it wants, whenever it wants: to extract minerals, to grab land, to build highways and bases. Think of the Pakistani government’s relationship to its southwestern province of Baluchistan as similar to that of Washington to the American West in the mid-19th century, when the native American Indians still moved freely, though decreasingly so, and the cavalry had strategic outposts.

Indeed, as the government builds roads and military bases, Baluch and minority Hindus are being forcibly displaced. Both groups are thought to harbor sympathy for India, and they do: in Baluch and Hindu eyes, India acts as a counterweight to an oppressive Pakistani state. The hope of these minorities is that a fissiparous Pakistan, with its history of dysfunctional civilian and military governments, will give way in the fullness of time to a sprawling Greater India, thus liberating Baluchistan to pursue its destiny as a truly autonomous region.

So: Will Pakistan, beset by internal contradictions that never befell 19th-century America, gradually disintegrate before it subjugates the Baluch? The answer to that question, which will also shape the future of Pakistan’s neighbors, is bound up with the future of Gwadar, a port town of 70,000 close to the border with Iran, at the far end of the Makran coast.

If we can think of great place-names of the past—Carthage, Thebes, Troy, Samarkand, Angkor Wat—and of the present—Dubai, Singapore, Tehran, Beijing, Washington—then Gwadar should qualify as a great place-name of the future.

During the military rule of Ayub Khan in the 1960s, shortly after Oman ceded the territory to Pakistan in 1958, Gwadar fired the imagination of Pakistani planners. They saw it as an alternative air-and-naval hub to Karachi that, along with the port of Pasni to the east, would make Pakistan a great Indian Ocean power athwart the whole Near East. But the Pakistani state was young, poor, and insecure, with weak infrastructure and institutions. Gwadar remained a dream.

The next people to set their sights on Gwadar were the Russians. Gwadar was the ultimate prize denied them during their decade-long occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s—the fabled warm-water outlet to the sea that formed the strategic raison d’être for their Afghan adventure in the first place. From Gwadar, the Soviet Union could have exported the hydrocarbon wealth of Central Asia. But Afghanistan proved to be the graveyard of Soviet imperial visions. Gwadar, still just a point on the map, a huddle of fishermen’s stone houses on a spit of sand, was like a poisoned chalice.

Yet the story goes on. In the 1990s, successive democratic Pakistani governments struggled to cope with intensifying social and economic turmoil. Violence was endemic to Karachi and other cities. But even as the Pakistani political elite turned inward, it remained obsessed with the related problems of Afghanistan and energy routes. Anarchy in the wake of the Soviet withdrawal was preventing Pakistan from establishing roads and pipelines to the new oil states of Central Asia—routes that would have helped Islamabad consolidate a vast Muslim rear base for the containment of India. So obsessed was Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s government with curbing the chaos in Afghanistan that she and her interior minister, the retired general Naseerullah Babar, conceived of the newly formed Taliban as a solution. But, as Unocal and other oil firms, intrigued by the idea of building energy pipelines from the Caspian Sea across Afghanistan to Indian Ocean energy hubs like Gwadar, eventually found out, the Taliban were hardly an agent of stability.

Then, in October 1999, after years of civilian misrule, General Pervez Musharraf took power in a bloodless coup. In 2000, he asked the Chinese to fund a deepwater port at Gwadar. A few weeks before 9/11, the Chinese agreed, and their commitment to the project intensified after the U.S. invaded Afghanistan. Thus, with little fanfare, Gwadar became an example of how the world changed in the wake of the World Trade Center attacks in ways that many Americans and the Bush administration did not anticipate. The Chinese spent $200 million on the first phase of the port project, which was completed on schedule in 2005. In 2007, Pakistan gave PSA International of Singapore a 40-year contract to run Gwadar port.

So now imagine a bustling deepwater port at the extreme southwestern tip of Pakistan, much more a part of the Middle East than of the Indian subcontinent, equipped with a highway, and oil and natural-gas pipelines, extending north all the way through some of the highest mountains in the world, the Karakorams, into China itself, where more roads and pipelines connect the flow of consumer goods and hydrocarbons to China’s burgeoning middle-class markets farther east. Another branch of this road-and-pipeline network would go north from Gwadar through a stabilized Afghanistan, and on into Iran and Central Asia. Gwadar, in this way, becomes the hub of a new Silk Road, both land and maritime; a gateway to landlocked, hydrocarbon-rich Central Asia; an exotic 21st-century place-name.

But history is as much a series of accidents and ruined schemes as it is of great plans. And when I got to Gwadar, the pitfalls impressed me as much as the dreams. What was so fantastic about Gwadar was its present-day reality. It was every bit the majestic frontier town that I had imagined, occupying a sweeping, bone-dry peninsula set between long lines of ashen cliffs and a sea the color of rusty tap water. The cliffs, with their buttes and mesas and steeple-like ridges, were a study in complexity. The town at their base could have been mistaken for the sprawling, rectilinear remains of an ancient Near Eastern city: low, scabby white stone walls separating sand drifts and mounds of rubble. People sat here and there in broken-backed kitchen chairs, sipping tea under the shade of bamboo and burlap. Everyone wore traditional clothes; there were no Western polyesters. The scene evoked a 19th-century lithograph of Jaffa, in Palestine, or Tyre, in Lebanon, by David Roberts: dhows emerging out of the white, watery miasma, laden with silvery fish and manned by fishermen dressed in ****** turbans and shalwar kameezes, prayer beads dripping out of their pockets.

I watched as piles of trout, snapper, tiger prawns, perch, bass, sardines, and skates were dropped into straw baskets and put ashore via an ingenious pulley system. A big shark, followed by an equally large swordfish, was dragged by ropes into a vast, stinking market shed where still-living fish slapped on a bloody cement floor beside piles of manta rays. Until the next phase of the port-and-pipeline project is in full swing, traditional fishing is everything here.

At a nearby beach, I watched as dhows were built and repaired. Some men used their fingers to smear epoxy on the wooden seams of the hulls while others, sprawled next to scrawny dogs and cats, took long smokes in the shade. There were no generators, no electric drills—just craftsmen making holes with manual drills turned by bows, as though they were playing stringed instruments. A few men working for three months can build a 40-foot fishing boat in Gwadar. The teak comes from Burma and Indonesia. Cod-liver oil, painted on the hulls, provides waterproofing. The life of a boat is 20 years. To take advantage of the high tides, new boats are launched on the first and 15th days of the lunar cycle. This was Arabia before the modern era.

As-Salem Musa, a turbaned Baluch graybeard, told me that his father and grandfather before him built boats. He fondly remembered the days of Omani control, which were “freer” because “we were able to sail all around the gulf without restrictions.” He harbored both hope for and fear of the future: change could mean even less freedom for the Baluch, as Punjabis and other urban Pakistanis sweep down to take over the city.

“They don’t have a chance,” a Pakistani official in Islamabad told me, referring to the fishermen in Gwadar. “Modernity will wipe out their traditional life.”

In the covered bazaar, amid the most derelict of tea, spice, and dry-goods shops, their dusty jars filled with stale candy, I met more old men with beards and turbans, who spoke with nostalgia about the sultan of Oman, and how Gwadar had prospered under his rule. Many of these old men had dual Omani-Pakistani nationality. They led me through somnolent, burlap-covered streets and along crumbling mud-brick facades, past half-starved cows and goats hugging the shade of collapsed walls, to a small, round, stuccoed former palace with overhanging wooden balconies. Like everything else in Gwadar, it was in an advanced stage of disintegration. The sea peeked through at every turn, now bottle-green in the midafternoon sun.

At another beach I came upon the stunning, bizarre sight of donkeys—the smallest donkeys I had ever seen—charging out of the water and onto the sand, pulling creaky carts loaded down with fish just transferred from boats bobbing in the waves and flying a black-white-yellow-and-green local flag of Baluchistan. Miniature donkeys emerging from the sea! Gwadar was a place of wonders, slipping through an hourglass.

Nearby, the Chinese-built deepwater port, with its neat angles, spanking-new gantry cranes, and other cargo-handling equipment, appeared charged with expectation, even as the complex stood silent and empty against the horizon, waiting for decisions from Islamabad. Just a few miles away, in the desert, a new industrial zone and other development sites had been fenced off, with migrant-labor camps spread alongside, waiting for construction to begin. “Just wait for the new airport,” another businessman from Karachi told me. “During the next building phase of the port complex, you will see the Dubai miracle taking shape.”

But everyone who spoke to me about the port as a business hub to rival Dubai (notwithstanding its current economic troubles) neglected a key fact: the Gulf sheikhdoms, and Dubai in particular, have wise, effective, and wholly legitimate governments.
pakistan-map.jpg

Whether Gwadar becomes a new silk-route nexus or not is tied to Pakistan’s own struggle against becoming a failed state. Pakistan, with its “Islamic” nuclear bomb, Taliban- and al-Qaeda-infested northwestern borderlands, dysfunctional cities, and territorially based ethnic groups for whom Islam could never provide adequate glue, is commonly referred to as the most dangerous country in the world, a nuclear Yugoslavia-in-the-making. And so Gwadar is a litmus test, not just for roads and energy routes but for the stability of the entire Arabian Sea region. If Gwadar languishes, and remains what to a Western visitor was just a charming fishing port, it will be yet more evidence of Pakistan’s failure as a nation.

After spending a few days in Gwadar, I attracted the attention of the local police, who thereafter insisted on accompanying me everywhere with a truckload of black-clad commandos armed with AK‑47s. The police said they wanted to protect me. But Gwadar had no terrorism; it was one of the safest places that I had been to in nine visits to Pakistan.

Talking to people became nearly impossible; the locals clearly feared the police. “We Baluch only want to be free,” I was told whenever out of earshot of my security detail. You might think that economic development would give the Baluch the freedom they craved. But that’s not how they saw it. More development, I was told, meant more Chinese, Singaporeans, Punjabis, and other outsiders. Indeed, evidence indicated that the Baluch would not only fail to benefit from rising real-estate prices, but in many cases would lose their land altogether—and they knew it.

In June 2008, The Herald, a respected Karachi-based investigative magazine, published a cover story, “The Great Land Robbery,” alleging that the Gwadar project had “led to one of the biggest land scams in Pakistan’s history.” The magazine detailed a system in which revenue clerks had been bribed by elites to register land in their names; the land was then resold at rock-bottom prices to developers from Karachi, Lahore, and other major cities for residential and industrial schemes. Hundreds of thousands of acres of land were said to have been illegally allotted to civilian and military bureaucrats living elsewhere. In this way, the poor and uneducated Baluch population had been shut out of Gwadar’s future prosperity. And so, Gwadar became a lightning rod for Baluch hatred of Punjabi-ruled Pakistan. Indeed, Gwadar’s very promise as an Indian Ocean–Central Asian hub threatened to sunder the country.

Pakistan’s Arabian Sea coast has long been rife with separatist rebellion: both Baluchistan and Sind have rich, venerable histories as self-contained entities. In recent decades, the Baluch, who number 6 million, have mounted four insurgencies against the Pakistani military to protest economic and political discrimination. The fiercest of these wars, from 1973 to 1977, embroiled some 80,000 Pakistani troops and 55,000 Baluch warriors. Baluch memories of the time are bitter. In 1974, writes the South Asia expert Selig S. Harrison, “Pakistani forces, frustrated by their inability to find Baluch guerrilla units hiding in the mountains, bombed, strafed and burned the encampments of some 15,000 Baluch families … forcing the guerrillas to come out from their hideouts to defend their women and children.”

What Harrison calls a “slow-motion genocide” has continued. In 2006, thousands of Baluch fled villages attacked by Pakistani F‑16 fighter jets and Cobra helicopter gunships. Large-scale, government-organized kidnappings and disappearances followed. That year, the Pakistani army killed the Baluch leader Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti. But as government tactics have grown more brutal, a new and better-armed generation of Baluch warriors has hardened into an authentic national movement. Emerging from a literate middle class in the capital of Quetta and elsewhere, and financed by compatriots in the Persian Gulf, these Baluch have surmounted the age-old weakness of feuding tribes, which outsiders like the Punjabis in the Pakistani military once played against each other. According to the International Crisis Group, “The insurgency now crosses regional, ethnic, tribal and class lines.” Helping the Baluch, the Pakistanis say, have been the Indian intelligence services, which clearly benefit from the Pakistani armed forces’ being tied down by separatist rebellions. The Pakistani military has countered by pitting radical Islamic parties against the secular Baluch. As one activist mournfully told the International Crisis Group, “Baluchistan is the only secular region between Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan and has no previous record of religious extremism.”

The Baluch amount to less than 4 percent of Pakistan’s 173 million people, but Pakistan’s natural resources, including copper, uranium, potentially rich oil reserves, and natural gas, are mostly found in Baluchistan. The province produces more than a third of the country’s natural gas, yet it consumes only a tiny amount. Moreover, as Harrison explains, the central government has paid meager royalties for the gas and denied the province development aid.

Thus, the real-estate scandal in Gwadar, combined with fears of a Punjabi takeover there, taps into a bitter history of subjugation. To taste the emotions behind all of this, I met with Baluch nationalist leaders in Karachi.

The setting for the first meeting was a KFC in the Karachi neighborhood of Clifton. Inside were young people wearing Western clothes or pressed white shalwar kameezes, the men with freshly shaven chins or long beards. Yet despite the clash of styles, they all had a slick, suburban demeanor. Over trays of chicken and Pepsi, they were texting and talking on their cell phones. Drum music blasted from loudspeakers: Punjabi bhangra. Into this upscale tableaux strode five Baluch men in soiled and unpressed shalwar kameezes, wearing turbans and to*pees, with stacks of papers under their arms, including the issue of The Herald with the cover story on Gwadar.

Nisar Baluch, the general secretary of a Baluch nationalist organization, was the group’s leader. He had unruly black hair and a thick moustache. His fingertips tapped on the table as he lectured me, staring into the middle distance. “The Pakistani army is the biggest land grabber,” he began. “It is giving away the coast of Baluchistan for peanuts to the Punjabis.

“The Punjabi army wears uniforms, but the soldiers are actually terrorists,” he continued. “In Gwadar, the army is operating as a mafia, falsifying land records. They say we don’t have papers to prove our ownership of the land, though we’ve been there for centuries.” Baluch told me he was not against development, and supported dialogue with the Pakistani authorities. “But when we talk about our rights, they accuse us of being Taliban.

“We’re an oppressed nation,” he said, never raising his voice, even as his finger-tapping grew in intensity. “There is no other choice but to fight. The whole world is now talking about Gwadar. The entire political establishment in this country is involved in the crime being perpetrated there.”

Then came this warning:

“No matter how hard they try to turn Gwadar into Dubai, it won’t work. There will be resistance. The pipelines going to China will not be safe. They will have to cross through Baluch territory, and if our rights are violated, nothing will be secure.” In 2004, in fact, a car bomb killed three Chinese engineers on their way to Gwadar. Other nationalists have said that Baluch insurgents would eventually kill more Chinese workers, bringing further uncertainty to Gwadar.

Nisar Baluch was the warm-up to Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri, the chief of the Marri tribe of Baluch, a man who had been engaged in combat with government forces off and on for 50 years, and whose son had recently been killed by Pakistani troops. Marri greeted me in his Karachi villa, with massive exterior walls, giant plants, and ornate furniture. He was old and wizened, and walked with a cane. Marri spoke a precise, hesitant, whispering English that, combined with his robe and beige topee and the setting, gave him a certain charisma.

“If we keep fighting,” he told me gently, “we will ignite an intifada like the Palestinians’. It is the cause of my optimism that the young generation of Baluch will sustain a guerrilla war. Pakistan is not eternal. It is not likely to last. The British Empire, Pakistan, Burma—these have all been temporary creations.

“After Bangladesh left Pakistan,” Marri continued, in his mild and lecturing tone, “the only dynamic left within this country was the imperialist power of the Punjabi army. East Bengal was the most important element in Pakistan. The Bengalis were numerous enough to take on the Punjabis, but they seceded. Now the only option left for the Baluch is to fight.” He liked and trusted no one in Pakistan who was not Baluch, he told me.

And what about Punjabi overtures to make amends with the Baluch?, I asked.

“We say to these Punjabis”—still in his sweet, regal voice—“‘Leave us alone. Get lost. We don’t need your direction, your brotherliness.’ If Punjab continues to occupy us with the help of the American imperialists, then eventually our name will be nowhere in the soil.”

Marri explained that Baluchistan overlaps three countries—Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan—and would eventually triumph, as the central governments of all those lands weakened. Gwadar, in his view, was just the latest Punjabi plot that would prove temporary. The Baluch would bomb the roads and pipelines leading out of the town.

Leaving his villa, I realized the development of Gwadar depended on how the government in Islamabad behaved. If it did not make a grand bargain with the Baluch, of a scope that would isolate embittered men like Marri and Nisar Baluch, then indeed the giant project near the Iranian border would become another lost city in the sand, beset by local rebellion. If the government did make such a bargain, allowing Baluchistan to emerge as a region-state under the larger rubric of a democratic and decentralized Pakistan, then the traditional fishing village that I saw could well give way to a Rotterdam of the Arabian Sea, its highways and pipelines stretching northward to Samarkand.

But nothing was destiny.
 
‘Akbar Bugti caused the explosion that led to his death’

LAHORE: A close aide of late Baloch nationalist leader Nawab Akbar Bugti has claimed that a rocket fired by Bugti caused the explosion that led to the nationalist leader’s death. “When security forces entered the cave where he (Bugti) was hiding, he attempted to fend them off by firing a shell. This caused a massive explosion, which resulted in the cave-in that led to the death of Bugti, one colonel, two majors and three commandoes,” Wadera Muhammad Murad Bugti told a private TV channel. He said the late Bugti had decided that he would rather die fighting than surrender to the security forces. “When forces besieged his cave on August 26, 2006, he asked his comrades to leave the cave and let him fight them alone,” he added. daily times monitor

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
Since Halaku posted an article quoting Selig and his fantastic claims of genocide, I am cross posting a prior comment:

Some more doubts about Selig Harrison's credibility and objectivity as it relates to Pakistan, but first an excerpt form his book in 1981 about the events at Chamalang:

Every summer, the Marri nomads converge on the broad pasture lands of the Chamalang valley, one of the few rich grazing areas in all of Balochistan. In 1974, many of the men stayed in the hills to fight with the guerrillas, but the women, children, and older men streamed down from the mountains with their flocks and set up their black tents in a sprawling, fifty-square mile area. Chamalang, they thought, would be a haven from the incessant bombing and strafing attacks in the highlands. As the fighting gradually reached a stalemate, however, the army decided to take advantage of this concentration of Marri families as means of luring the guerrillas down from the hills. The Pakistani officers calculated-correctly-that attacks on the tent villages would compel guerrillas to come out in the open in defense of their families.

After a series of preliminary skirmishes in surrounding areas, the army launched Operation Chamalang on September 3rd, 1974, using a combined assault by ground and air forces. Interviews with Pakistani officers and Baluch participants indicate that some 15,000 Marris were massed at Chamalang. Guerrilla units formed a huge protective circle around their families and livestock. They fought for three days and nights, braving artillery fire and occasional strafing attacks by F-86 and Mirage fighter planes and Huey Cobras. Finally, when the Baluch ran out of ammunition, they did what they could to regroup and escape.


This excerpt is from Pakistan's Security Under Zia, 1977-1988 by Robert Wirsing
"More common, however, was the view that Pakistan had never been a viable state, that brute force was all that held it together, and that the United States, in supplying its government with the arms to repress dissent, was exposing itself to considerable risk of guilt by association. No one more tirelessly advanced these themes than the Carnegie Endowment's long time South Asia-watcher, Selig Harrison. "As the Bengali's still bitterly recall," Harrison reminded his listeners in congressional hearings on the Reagan administrations proposed aid package in 1981, "it was American weaponry that the Pakistan Army used against them. Similarly, when the Baluch staged and insurgency of their own in 1973, Islamabad once again turned its US Equipment not against invading Communist forces, but against its own people. It took 80,000 Pakistani troops four years to subdue the Baluch, despite repeated strafing attacks on the Baluch villages by US fighter planes received under the military aid program and by Huey-Cobra helicopters borrowed from the Shah of Iran." In an article published in 1978, Harrison had written that " at the height of the fighting in late 1974, American supplied Iranian combat helicopters provided the key to victory in a crucial battle at Chamalang in early September when a force of some 17000 guerrillas of the Marri tribe, was decimated."

Harrison's claim was factually inaccurate and highly misleading. By 1970, Chinese-supplied aircaft made up "33 percent of the Pakistan Air Force's 270 planes, 65 percent of all the interceptor-bombers, and 90 percent of the first-line modern fighter planes at its disposal." These percentages rose even higher in the first few years of the 1970's (prior to the outbreak of the Baloch insurgency) with large Chinese transfers to Pakistan of the Shanyang F-6 (mig 19). The sinification of PAF's inventory was clearly in an advanced stage when the insurgency broke out in Baluchistan in 1973. To the extent that the air force was involved at all in the fighting in Baluchistan, the probability was slight that it would have used its Korean War vintage F-86 Sabre jets and not its newer and far more numerous Chinese aircraft. AS for the Huey-Cobra helicopter gunships, no armed helicopters of any kind were used by the Pakistan army against the Baluch insurgents. Pakistan had none of its own at that time, and the Shah loaned Pakistan only a small number (most sources say ten, but estimates range as high as thirty) of unarmed, Iranian piloted Chinook transport helicopters. These, according to well informed sources, played an extremely minor role in the fighting and were returned to Iran in may 1974 after only eight months or so in Baluchistan. They played absolutely no role, incidentally, in the battle at Chamalang, which took place months after the Iranian helicopters had been withdrawn.

Though its authenticity was questionable at best, Harrison's evocative tale of the gunship helicopters was picked up and repeated for years thereafter by a wide variety of commentators on Pakistan. The picture he painted of the dread American killer cobras raining death upon the practically defenseless Baluch insurgents inevitably made a powerful impression in a population that had only a few years earlier forced its government that abandoned a much bloodier counterinsurgency war in Vietnam....

The lack of gunships is also validated by Musharraf's warning recently to the militants that this time they wouldn't be able to hide in the hills because Pakistan did have gunships.

Almost every reference to the events in 1974 that I have found in some way are attributed to Selig Harrison's comments - from his book or his various articles - and it is unfortunate that he has painted a misleading account about those events. His own account does not seem to add up. The Pakistan Army apparently attacked the camp at Chamalang first, but somehow 17,000 Baluch militants (his figure as quoted by Wirsing above) managed to sneak in and form a ring around the site (from his book). The obvious answer is that the camp already had militants in it, perhaps drawn by the "skirmishes" with militants around the camp, which then led to the camp becoming a legitimate target.

I am not suggesting that there was no collateral damage at all, nor that the PA never used brutal tactics, but Selig Harrison's accounts are over the top.
 
What needs to be done is to recognize the right of the provinces over their resources. If Gas is coming from the Sui in Balochistan, a large chunk of royalty must go to the Balochistan, similarly royalty on hydalpower must go to the NWFP, royalty from Agriculture must go to Punjab and royalty from the shipping industry must go to the Sindh.

Even though Pakistan got its independence from the colonial rule, the country is still being run on the same lines. Buy few most powerful landlords/politicians, and rule the province through them. In the whole process the federal government has totally isolated herself from the common people of the different provinces.

Since I have lived in Balochiastan for 25 or so years, I have seen very closely the dealing of the GoP with the Sardars and the politicians (who are actually landlords again). Instead of giving due royalty of Sui Gas to the people of Balochistan, a large amount was paid directly to Nawab Akbar Bugti and other Sardars in order to keep them quite and what happened to the real dues, no one knows. Even in Quetta, the gas reached in around 1983 whereas until recently a majority of Balochistan's towns had no Gas that was coming from their own land. Turbat and Makran have no electricity (now even rest of the Pakistan has none or very little!), and people are forced to use diesel electric generator. In fact, some electricity comes from Iran to several border towns. With my Dad, I have traveled throughout Balochistan by Road and sometimes by chopper and you’ll be surprised that except for the major highway (Quetta-Karachi), Western Balochistan has mostly dirt roads.

Trust me, under these circumstances, people do become rebellious. Baloch may have several inappropriate demands, but they do have several other very legitimate ones. And I guess this is as truer for the inhabitants of other provinces (including Punjab). In my personal view, there is no silver bullet that can solve all these problems, but the limited provincial autonomy and the recognition of the rights of the provinces over their resources.
 
PPP calls meeting prior to APC on Balochistan

* Meeting will discuss grievances of Baloch people
* PPP decides not to field candidates against Nawaz, Shahbaz Sharif

ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari on Tuesday advised Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani to convene a Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) meeting on Balochistan prior to holding an all-parties conference (APC) on the matter.

The meeting would discuss the grievances of the Baloch people and mull recommendations for resolving outstanding issues.

Briefing the media on the meeting between Zardari and Gilani, president’s spokesman Farhatullah Babar said the PPP meeting would be convened by the prime minister in his capacity of the PPP vice chairman. The PPP meeting would serve as a prelude to the all-parties conference (APC) on Balochistan, which Gilani would convene later, he said.

The president told Gilani that issues faced by Balochistan could no longer be ignored and it was essential that a broad-based national consensus were achieved for settling the province’s grievances, Babar said.

The spokesman said Zardari had also advised the Balochistan Assembly to adopt unanimous resolutions and forward them to parliament, which in turn would re-endorse the suggestions for devising the way forward on the matter. Babar said the prime minister apprised the president about the rehabilitation efforts being undertaken for the internally displaced persons.

Candidates: Meanwhile, APP reported that the PPP had decided not to field candidates on any seat against the PML-N’s Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif, after the Supreme Court on Tuesday termed them eligible to contest elections and hold public office.

The decision was made in the meeting between Zardari and Gilani, and was a gesture of reconciliation and respect for each party’s mandate, the agency quoted its sources as saying. staff report/app
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
Magsi says nationalists no danger to federation

QUETTA: The separatists in Balochistan are not in any position to endanger the federation of Pakistan, as their activities are confined to political rhetoric, Balochistan Governor Zulfiqar Ali Magsi said on Tuesday. He told the media only a small percentage of the population of the province wanted independence. The remaining population are patriots who only want ownership of their resources, equal opportunities and equitable representation in the federation. (all these are valid demands which must be fulfilled) He said past problems had resulted from the centre refusing to consider the suggestions forwarded by the provincial government. Responding to questions about the financial health of the province, he said Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani had directed the provincial government to contact the Finance Division for aid. staff report
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
Editorial: Towards a Balochistan APC

May 28, 2009

President Asif Ali Zardari wants Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani to convene a Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) meeting on Balochistan prior to holding an all-parties conference (APC) on the matter. Obviously, if the wide spectrum of political parties in Pakistan is inclined to be vague while supporting reforms for Balochistan, the PPP must be clear in its mind about what it wants to propose at the APC.

The PPP meeting will be actually more important than the APC because it will put together the agenda of empowering the province where a sense of injustice has led to rebellion against the federation. From recent developments involving the alienation of the governor who serves at the pleasure of the president, and disaffection of the PPP president in Balochistan, it is clear that a meeting is called for to remove the cobwebs of emotion from the principle of devolution of power to the provinces.

Balochistan Governor Mr Zulfiqar Ali Magsi says that the separatists in Balochistan are not in any position to endanger the federation of Pakistan, as their “activities are confined to political rhetoric”. According to him, only a small percentage of the population of the province wants independence while the remaining are patriots who only want “ownership of their resources, equal opportunities and equitable representation in the federation”. On the basis of this observation, a “deal” with Balochistan is quite possible.

One good omen for the APC has been the positive vibe sent out recently from Punjab. Once the two big parties are agreed to let Balochistan have what rightfully belongs to it under devolution and autonomy, the clash of views at the APC will not matter too much. There is no doubt that the APC consensus will be in favour of Balochistan, unlike the APC on Swat where it was divided. What a bipartisan consensus in the APC on Balochistan will achieve is the rationalisation of extreme views on what Balochistan should have inside the federation.

There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that Balochistan should have far more autonomy than it has now, far more rights over its resources than it has now, and far more freedom of governance than it has now under the Constitution. Whatever it gets will also have to be given to all the provinces, even if that means amending the Constitution. And for that a bipartisan consensus will have to mould what emerges from the AP
 
PM announces Rs 80 bn Balochistan uplift outlay

Sunday, May 31, 2009

By our correspondent

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani on Saturday announced Rs 80 billion development outlay for Balochistan in the coming budget and said the government was fully committed to addressing the sense of deprivation in the people of the province.

The prime minister made this announcement in a meeting with a delegation of the Balochistan cabinet. Governor Balochistan Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi, Chief Minister Balochistan Nawab Mohammad Aslam Raisani and Deputy Chairman Senate Jan Mohammad Jamali were also present during the meeting.

The prime minister announced Rs 50 billion for Balochistan in the Public Sector Development Programme for the next financial year, giving an increase of Rs 8 billion over the last year’s PSDP of Rs 42 billion.

The prime minister also announced that the current financial year’s unspent amount of the PSDP funds for Balochistan worth Rs 21 billion would not lapse and would be made available to the province during the next financial year.

Gilani announced packages of Rs 9 billion for Balochistan, comprising Rs 3 billion for the Quetta package, Rs 3 billion for budgetary support and Rs 3 billion for the development schemes to be identified by the members of the Balochistan Assembly.

Thus the total development outlay available to the province of Balochistan in the next financial year would come to Rs 80 billion in addition to the funds allocated to MNAs and senators for development projects in their constituencies.

The prime minister said his government attached high priority to redress the grievances of the people of Balochistan and had decided that the entire political leadership of the province would be taken on board, including the parliamentary leadership, to resolve the decades-old outstanding issues of the province.

The prime minister said issues related to Balochistan needed immediate attention and, therefore, a special committee had been formed to work out the modalities for developing a broader consensus by taking all the stakeholders on board for permanent resolution of the problems.

“Mian Raza Rabbani has been asked to finalise the draft recommendations for Balochistan that will be presented before the All Parties Conference,” he added.

About the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award, the prime minister said the government was serious in its implementation at the earliest.

He also dispelled the impression that the Balochistan Assembly would be dissolved and said the country was passing through a critical juncture and could not afford any such thing.

He said like the previous year, the government would try to provide Rs 5 million to each constituency of the National Assembly.

The prime minister also took into confidence the Baloch leadership about the ongoing operation in the Malakand Division and said the action had to be taken as a last resort, as the other party did not honour its part of the commitment.

He said the operation in parts of the NWFP was in fact a war for the survival of Pakistan and expressed confidence that the miscreants would be defeated soon and the people would return to their homes with honour and dignity.

The prime minister said the Balochistan government must ensure the implementation of 5 per cent quota for minorities.

Answering a suggestion, he said the government would conduct feasibility about setting up of a women sports complex in Quetta.

He said soon a meeting of the federal cabinet would be held at Gwadar, which would also be attended by members of the provincial assembly.

The prime minister said he had already called a meeting of the PPP Balochistan Provincial Executive Committee in Islamabad on June 5, 2009 in order to take the provincial party on board before the All Parties Conference.

The meeting will be attended by the provincial office-bearers, divisional presidents and heads of the party’s affiliated wings as well as members of the Central Executive Committee and the Federal Council from Balochistan besides Chief Minister Nawab Aslam Raisani.

He said that various steps for the speedy socio-economic development of Balochistan for bringing the province at par with other provinces were under way and expressed confidence that these new initiatives would greatly help in addressing the concerns of the people of Balochistan.

He said work on 111 Basic Health Units in the province would commence to provide better health facilities to the people.

Appreciating the prime minister’s announcement regarding the enhancement of the PSDP funds and various other packages, the delegation extended its full support to the federal government.

They also lauded the prime minister’s initiative for convening the PPP Balochistan Provincial Executive Committee meeting and hoped that it would go a long way in bringing about a change in the lives of the people of Balochistan.

The delegation included Balochistan ministers Maulana Abdul Wassey, Asim Kurd, Syed Ehsan Shah, Engr Zamrak Khan, Sardar Sanaullah Khan Zehri, Capt (retd) Abdul Khaliq, Mir Shahnawaz Marri, Haji Muhammad Khan, Mir Abdur Rehman Mengal, Mir Hamal Kalmati, Parveen Magsi, Rubina Irfan and MPA Sh Jaffar Khan Mandokhel.

The chief secretary Balochistan and the secretary finance Balochistan were also present during the meeting.
PM announces Rs 80 bn Balochistan uplift outlay
 
now i hope this money is used properly and now how those sardars used to deal with it (goin to their own pockets)
 
Well all the happening in Balochistan is because of our THAND TIME in india and afghanistan. Where are the Mujaddadi and Hikmat Yaar why don't we reactivate them in there areas? All these will be stoped if we do so.........
 
Terrorists are terrorists are terrorists at the end of the day...the "good"/"bad" distinction within the Taliban, Bajrang Dal, and sundry fundamentalists needs to be removed. A blanket call for state action is what is needed. The fact remains that liberation by terrorists will only bring on terroist government in the power-vacuum--we in India saw that in 2002 under Modi in Gujarat, and you have seen that before in Afghanistan, and NWFP.

The very nature of terrorism is that it is insatiable. This, by the way, is called the "March of the dimes" effect in strategic studies--their goals will always expand if you give them concessions.
 
Solutions needed

Dawn Editorial
Tuesday, 30 Jun, 2009


ALL is not well in Balochistan. The simmering insurgency there shows no sign of abating. But why should it? After all nothing has been done on the ground to meet the demands of the disgruntled Baloch. The provincial budget with an outlay of Rs72.2bn hardly reassured those in the province who are demanding control over their resources. Be it the gas in Sui, the mineral wealth of Saindak and now the deep-water port in Gwadar, one knows well that the underdeveloped province will not be the major beneficiary of these projects. Even the NFC which divides taxes collected by the centre among the provinces works against Balochistan, which is contributing handsomely to the treasury but gets very little in return. The allocation is made on the basis of population and Balochistan happens to be sparsely populated. The province needs proportionately more funds to develop infrastructure throughout its sprawling territory and make facilities accessible to its scattered population. Long overdue, a new NFC Award is being promised but nothing has been delivered. And, with summer in full swing, it is a major blow to a water-starved province to be deprived of 30 per cent of its water entitlement.

Seen against this backdrop, it is shocking that Islamabad doesn’t seem to be in a hurry to put matters right. Since the PPP government assumed office more than a year ago it has been reiterating its commitment to negotiate with the Baloch to resolve problems that have already been identified — many of them by committees and subcommittees set up by the centre itself. An apology has been offered by the president and the need to grant autonomy to the province has been conceded. But this is just talk and no one walks the walk. As a result we now have a hardening of the Baloch nationalists’ stance which may take them to the point of no return. On Sunday Sardar Akhtar Mengal, head of the BNP-M, said that even a compromise is not acceptable on the national rights of the Baloch. It is disturbing that the nationalists are now convinced that they are being taken down the garden path with offers of dialogue and negotiation that are designed to appease and not necessarily solve any problem. This is most disquieting because our failure to respect the political sensitivities of one province led to the loss of half the country. We cannot push another province over the brink. The government itself says that there is many a foreign power interested in continued turmoil in Balochistan. Why should we so willingly help?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom