What's new

Refugee Crisis Brews in Pakistan

First of the headline is misleading they are Not Refugees. They are not moving to any other country rather they moved from one part of Pakistan to other part simple as that.
The actual nomenclature is IDPs (Internally displaced persons). However this term although aptly describing the situation and commonly used these days by many an international authoritative body hasn't officially been included in the UNHCR's definition guide as yet (although it will be very soon). In the mean time the term refugee is actually the only legally recognized one that can be applied to this case.

Jana said:
So trolls dont need to jump like monkeys in the first place.


Now coming to your point well your flag shows you are from UK right so you dont know a s.hit what is going on in my province so dont need to come up with an emotional statement without substance.
This is funny coming from you. Considering that your entire e-persona is based on the exact activity for which you're castigating martialLaw. Not knowing anything about a situation has never stopped you from trolling... oh wait I forgot... it is only fine when you do it against the West or India... but god forbid if anyone said anything wrong about YOUR PROVINCE!!!!!

Jana said:
We fully support the current operation going on in Bajaur as this time Baitullah is holed up and Inshallah this mole of US/CIA/India going to be slaughterd like anything.
Yes yes.. its all a giant conspiracy. Also you forgot to mention Mossad and the KGB!!!! You're slipping Jana, you're slipping.
 
Very nice speech. However it shows how clueless you are......

The guys fighting against the rule of law are using the civilians to hide behind and supply them with food and other supplies. The army has to target these areas in order to defeat the Militants. It's simple guerrilla warfare. the civilians don't want to be human shields for the Militants and are leaving (understandably).
Now if the Militants were not hiding behind the civilians there would not be a problem at all would there.........

I am sure there is a school you should be burning or women whose education you should be preventing. But occasionally do look up military tactics.
MartialLaw's post is undoubtedly indicative of his cluelessness. Nonetheless he inadvertently does bring the valid issue of the Pak government not being prepared to handle the IDPs. This is IMO of utmost importance. If I'm not mistaken the west has offered help in this regards. I hope its taken promptly; get the UNHCR involved if its a must. But if we assume that this conflict is going to go on for a considerable amount of time, and that the status of the IDPs isn't going to change in the near future, then it would be prudent of the GoP to ensure to temporarily house these people in an appropriate manner where they have ample access to food, shelter and most of all education. There is enough data out there supporting the theory that IDPs (particularly children) are far more susceptible to radicalism and other anti-social activities (even if they're running from it). Needless to say this cycle cannot be allowed to repeat itself.
 
MartialLaw's post is undoubtedly indicative of his cluelessness. Nonetheless he inadvertently does bring the valid issue of the Pak government not being prepared to handle the IDPs. This is IMO of utmost importance. If I'm not mistaken the west has offered help in this regards. I hope its taken promptly; get the UNHCR involved if its a must. But if we assume that this conflict is going to go on for a considerable amount of time, and that the status of the IDPs isn't going to change in the near future, then it would be prudent of the GoP to ensure to temporarily house these people in an appropriate manner where they have ample access to food, shelter and most of all education. There is enough data out there supporting the theory that IDPs (particularly children) are far more susceptible to radicalism and other anti-social activities (even if they're running from it). Needless to say this cycle cannot be allowed to repeat itself.

First create the problem then offer 'help' , no thanks Id rather not take it
 
I think conceptually MartialLaw has valid points, few so called intellectuals, though it looks like they are also not in Pakistan and do not have any idea of ground reality going mad against him.

This is simply true that military operation against own people can never solve problems, generally own people take guns in hand due to political reasons and their problems can only be solved politically.

What is happening in Pakistan (mass suicide bombing etc.) is outcome of 9 years military Raj and military is not going to solve the issue rather make the whole situation worse.

I want to just point out one thing here how great members of this forum having completely opposite view to general public of Pakistan, example when Musharraf resigned we were really sad but general people in Pakistan celebrated it. I afraid this due difference between class and mass...
 
I think conceptually MartialLaw has valid points, few so called intellectuals, though it looks like they are also not in Pakistan and do not have any idea of ground reality going mad against him.

This is simply true that military operation against own people can never solve problems, generally own people take guns in hand due to political reasons and their problems can only be solved politically.

What is happening in Pakistan (mass suicide bombing etc.) is outcome of 9 years military Raj and military is not going to solve the issue rather make the whole situation worse.

I want to just point out one thing here how great members of this forum having completely opposite view to general public of Pakistan, example when Musharraf resigned we were really sad but general people in Pakistan celebrated it. I afraid this due difference between class and mass...

You seem to have missed the arguments raised by all of us 'so called intellectuals' in response to Martial Law's points, which you have repeated.

That our opinions might be in the minority in Pakistan has been acknowledged, but that does not necessarily make our opinion the 'wrong' opinion. The fallout from the IDP's not being properly taken care off, especially if the displacement of the people from their homes becomes one of an extended duration, has also been acknowledged, and none of us 'so called intellectuals' have argued against proper facilities and care for the IDP's.

That said, neither Martial law nor you have offered anything constructive for tackling the militant threat, resorting to making general statements about 'military ops against own people are bad'.

We agree on the danger of IDP's not being taken care of - what is your solution to the issue, other than telling the US to shove off and let the Taliban run riot?
 
You seem to have missed the arguments raised by all of us 'so called intellectuals' in response to Martial Law's points, which you have repeated.

That our opinions might be in the minority in Pakistan has been acknowledged, but that does not necessarily make our opinion the 'wrong' opinion. The fallout from the IDP's not being properly taken care off, especially if the displacement of the people from their homes becomes one of an extended duration, has also been acknowledged, and none of us 'so called intellectuals' have argued against proper facilities and care for the IDP's.

That said, neither Martial law nor you have offered anything constructive for tackling the militant threat, resorting to making general statements about 'military ops against own people are bad'.

We agree on the danger of IDP's not being taken care of - what is your solution to the issue, other than telling the US to shove off and let the Taliban run riot?



How about this as a constructive solution to solving the problem of "militancy" [as you put it] : ditch the US-lead "War On Terror" and cease making enemies of Pakistan's own people . . . !!

. . . Islamabad should approach the tribal areas as a credible and independent state addressing its own people, not a 'lackey' of US imperialism. This will be sufficient signal for any [home-grown] militancy to stop its attacks against their own military and start to cooperate with both Islamabad and Pindi as trustworthy partners. This will ensure that any agreement entered into between tribal elements and Islamabad will not be torpedoed by the United States and result in more Muslim blood being spilt.

Making enemies of your own people results in disintegration . . . the lessons of East Pakistan must be learnt. I feel there is more wisdom amongst the Pakistani people than there is in the corrupt and discredited political establishment in Islamabad. If the security situation worsens, make no mistake . . . the Pakistani people will hold the civilian government and some members of the Pakistani military top brass directly responsible.

The violence we witness on the streets of Pakistan is a DIRECT consequence of the military incursions into the tribal belt. When people are attacked in their homes and villages, the martial spirit of our people will respond in kind.
We know about our people and our land . . . so why do we persist in alienating one Pakistani from another on the basis that one is more religious than the other !? What madness and stupidity is this !?
 
Its unfortunate that senior members on this forum have to resort to abuse just because somebody else has taken a different view to them about the current military engagement in the tribal belt.

I am, also, a little amused that some posters allege that Baitullah is in the pay of the CIA/US government !?

Can you substantiate these allegations?!

Assuming you can substantiate your allegations [which I doubt] . . . shouldn't you, by the very same token and principle, object to the Pakistani military and the civilian government from receiving "US aid" - which, is just blood money for killing Pakistanis in the failed War On Terror. ??

The moral and intellectual veracity of the arguments being deployed in favour of Pakistani military engagement in the tribal belt is of a poor order and there is no popular support for it amongst Pakistanis . . . inside and outside of the country.

Stop perpetuating the American Raj and back Pakistan as an INDEPENDENT and credible nation on the international arena. No nation has ever achieved distinction and greatness by being the vassal of another !!

Hon Martial Law, no doubt you have every right to view the situation as you see fit. Many people in Pakistan hold similar opinion. This however is root cause of the problem. It is said that road to hell is paved with good intentions. Let us examine the situation dispassionately.

Firstly, law and order is the responsibility of both the citizen and the state. Before the state is made responsible for safeguarding life and property of her citizens, citizens have to accept the laws and regulations made by the state. Currently people in certain part of FATA don’t accept the laws of Pakistan National Assembly and insist on the laws (as they interpret the Sharia) of their own making. Once they do this, they are classified as law breakers and not entitled to the privileges enjoyed by the law abiding citizen. All countries would use what ever force is necessary to enforce the writ of the gov't.

Secondly, once a civilian picks up a gun and is willing to us force against the state, he is no longer a civilian. Such a person is either a terrorist or a rebel or a criminal (such as Mafiosi or gangster) and he will be treated as an enemy of the state.

Now let us examine what the people who a misguided section of Pakistan society is obsessed with:

1. Akbar Bugti and his followers took up arms and refused to accept writ of the state. His followers are to date blowing up pipelines. In any country he would have met with a similar fate.

2. Las Masjid thugs fought govt forces with guns and insisted on enforcing their interpretation of Islam on every one else with complete disregard of the laws enacted by Pakistan's legislature. Did you ever ask what the guns were doing inside the mosque in first place?

3. Baitullh Mahsood and his followers are blowing girls schools, planting bombs inside the hospitals and have even attacked POF factory to enforce what they call Sharia law. Pray tell me why you and many people like you completely ignore their actions and blame every thing on Pakistan govt. What do you expect GOP to do? What twisted kind of love do you have for Pakistan and her people?

Terrorists can only succeed if and when they are supported by a section of the society. Are you aware of the consequences of aiding and abetting of criminals in the UK Law? I have full sympathy with the people who have been forced to move out of their homes. But why do you blame Pakistan’s security forces. If some of these would have informed on the terrorists in their midst, there would be no need for the PA to bomb.

There is little doubt that US is a bully. Being the sole super power US continues to do what their gov't thinks is in the best of US interest with complete disregard of the world opinion.
However, does your hate of the US justify destruction of Pakistan? You have mentioned American Raj. Do you mean that we should have accepted Lal Masjid thuggery and now the dictation of Baitullah Mahsood out of spite towards the US?

I couldn’t care less if Baitullah Mahsood and the Taliban create havoc in Afghanistan and kill with whatever means the NATO and US forces inside Afghanistan. But when they run away to hide inside Pakistan, they endanger Pakistan. Pakistan is not at war with US or NATO or the UK. Providing succour to the enemy is accepted as a genuine pretext for war. Do you really want Pakistan to fight US and NATO on behalf of Taliban? This is precisely the aim of the Taliban. It is surprising that many otherwise intelligent people are unable to realize this clear Taliban strategy.

You call this American Raj. With friend like you who needs enemies?
 
Dear niaz . . . I agree that consensus between the state and its citizens is vital in assisting the former to extend its writ throughout the land.

However, this is the crux of the issue . . . no such consensus exists in Pakistan. The political system in Islamabad is a renegade from the Pakistani people . . . it lacks any legitimacy, credibility or support . . . it is bankrupt. The Pakistani people and their governments have been drifting apart over successive generations, the chasm between them is as wide as the Grand Canyon.

The "War On Terror" has made matters worse by pitting the state against its own people . . . the latter being vehemently opposed to the conflict. For the Pakistani military top brass and the civilian political establishment to continue prosecuting this illegal and immoral war for America is bringing both into disrepute with the Pakistani people. It is not possible for the Pakistani state to accelerate military operations in the tribal belt without [further] eroding its standing with the Pakistani people . . . the very constituency the state needs in order to take on militancy.

In short, there is no military solution to what is, essentially, a cultural and political problem . . . one that only Islam and the Pakistani people can resolve.
A new political system would assist in unifying the state with its people, thereby, providing a platform for addressing serious internal+external issues. Accelerating military operations in the tribal belt will ensure that Pakistan will not only be fighting militants, but, the vast swathe of its own people . . . this is the self-destruct solution . . . M.A.D - mutual assured destruction.

You are, ofcourse, at liberty to advocate a military solution, but, you should be prepared to acknowledge its consequences and ramifications.
 
Martial Law:

Last I heard Islam did not advocate letting criminals get away scott free after repressing and murdering people and destroying private and public property. Islam does not allow for the Taliban to find sanctuary in Paksitan after attacking NATO and Afghan troops in Afghanistan.

If the Islam proposed by the Taliban is what the majority of the people want, and is the solution you suggest be adopted, then let there be MAD, for a Pakistan existing under the Islam of the barbarians calling themselves warriors of God is really not one worth anything.

We either prevent such a Pakistan, or be destroyed fighting against it.
 
Last edited:
Bajaur tribes to fight Taliban

LAHORE: Tribal elders belonging to various parts of Bajaur Agency have decided to fight the local Taliban, and demanded that the government halt the ongoing military operation in the agency, Samaa TV reported on Sunday. According to the channel, tribal jirgas held in Mamoon, Salarzai and Khar tehsils decided that local tribes would not provide shelter to the Taliban in their areas. daily times monitor
-----------------------------------

And I suppose these are the 'people' and the 'culture' that the GoP is allied against, a people and a culture that is in fact allying itself with the GoP to fight the horror of the Taliban.
 
And then there are civillains who may not be allied either with GoP (read Security Forces) nor Taliban....But when Security forces bomb their homes while fighting the taliban and victory over Taliban seems far away...they are only pushing these people towards talibani alliance...

Uprooted civilians beg Pakistan, militants to talk​
By NAHAL TOOSI, Associated Press Writer Nahal Toosi, Associated Press Writer – Sat Aug 23, 10:42 pm ET

PESHAWAR, Pakistan – Some of the women were eating lunch, while others were busy making bread.

Then, the bombs fell like rain.

Pakistan's latest military offensive against Taliban-led insurgents in its northwest had reached 60-year-old Haya Bibi and her extended family. They soon abandoned their mud homes in the Bajur tribal region and joined an exodus of tens of thousands of civilians walking and driving across rugged terrain to escape a 17-day operation some now call a war.

Bibi and some 45 relatives have spent the past week in sweltering, mosquito-infested tents in Pir Piai village near Peshawar city in one of more than 20 relief camps the government says are for the displaced.

Like others among the nearly 1,000 people at this camp, Bibi won't utter a critical word about the masked militants in her area. Pressed on whether she blames the government or the Taliban for her current state, she diplomatically says both, and requests the two sides try to work things out peacefully.

"We are the sufferers," a tearful Bibi says, fingering prayer beads while surrounded by a crowd of nodding relatives. "We don't want the fighting."

Aiding — and not disillusioning — those displaced by the war on terror is a huge challenge facing Pakistan as it tries to wipe out the insurgent presence in Bajur, a rumored hiding place for Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahri.

U.S. officials say tribal regions such as Bajur are turning into safe havens for militants involved in attacks on American and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Pakistani officials have been reluctant to divulge details of the operation in Bajur. Death tolls given more than a week ago put the number of suspected insurgents dead at more than 460 along with 22 paramilitary troops killed. No civilian death toll was given, though witnesses have reported dozens.

The information has been difficult to confirm because of the remote, dangerous nature of the fiercely independent and deeply conservative tribal areas, where the federal government has long had limited authority.

But if the numbers given so far are accurate, it is one of the bloodiest episodes since Pakistan first deployed its troops along its volatile border with Afghanistan in support of the U.S.-led war on terror nearly seven years ago.

Attempts to reach the army spokesman Saturday were not immediately successful. But previously officials have said army helicopter gunships and jets have been pounding militant positions since Aug. 6, when scores of insurgents attacked a military outpost.

The offensive comes amid exceptional political turbulence. Pervez Musharraf, a stalwart supporter of the U.S. in the war on terror, recently was forced to resign as president, and the young ruling coalition is on the brink of collapse.

And in Washington, American officials are worried about the new civilian government's resolve to fight militants.

Estimates vary, but at least 50,000 to possibly more than 200,000 people have fled Bajur and nearby Mohmand tribal region, officials say. Many are staying with relatives, while others are at camps facing difficult conditions and the prospect of disease.

The International Committee of the Red Cross said thousands of people had also shifted across the border into Afghanistan.

The U.S., which has pressed Pakistan to forcefully crack down on insurgents in its tribal belt, has declared the resulting civilian uprooting a "disaster" situation, and given $50,000 for aid such as gas stoves and utensils.

The conditions in the two camps visited by The Associated Press were dismal.

In Bibi's camp, for instance, the nearly 1,000 people, more than half of them children, are crowded into classrooms and tents in a school compound. Babies' skins were red raw with mosquito bites. In the sweltering heat, one woman lay shivering under a blanket — a sign of the malaria medical officials say has sprung up.

Diarrhea is ravaging the population, camp officials said, and the smell of fecal matters hangs in the air. There's no air conditioning, which is especially tough on women, who are trying to observe their cultural and religious traditions of staying indoors and out of the sight of unrelated men.

Every day, more families are arriving. On Friday, children helped clear grass to allow space to set up more tents.

"It is so hard here," said Jamshid Khan, a 20-something with a bum leg who reached the camp five days ago. "We want to go back as soon as possible."

Pakistan's Taliban movement, meanwhile, has claimed responsibility for at least three major attacks in recent days, calling them revenge for the Bajur operation and a military offensive in Swat. One attack, a twin suicide bombing at a weapons manufacturing complex near the capital, Islamabad, killed 67 people.

Mian Iftikhar Hussain, the information minister for Pakistan's North West Frontier Province, which lies next to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and is absorbing many of the displaced, called the civilian exodus a "gesture of cooperation from the local people," to allow the operation against the insurgents to avoid "collateral damage."

"To us, the main objective is to bring peace and stability in this area," he said. "We will fight until the last victory."

In interviews at two camps visited by the AP, virtually no one would criticize the Taliban or openly support the military action.

It was difficult to say why — whether they were scared, sympathetic, or genuinely not bothered by the insurgents, or whether tribal loyalties wouldn't allow them to speak ill of the militants to a foreigner.

Did the Taliban force them to give up male members to fight the jihad? "No."

Did the Taliban threaten the people? "No — they leave us alone, and we leave them alone."

Did the Taliban punish men without beards or women who wandered out alone? "No ... they might encourage people to observe Islamic law, but most of us do so anyway."

Is the Interior Ministry chief correct when he says more than 3,000 armed militants — many of them from other countries — are in Bajur? "We don't want to take sides."

Three women, including Bibi, said they saw militants offer to pay drivers to give lifts to civilians trying to escape.

Sartaj Khan, a slender 21-year-old with a sad face in the Pir Piai camp, said, "If anybody says anything bad about the Taliban, they'll go after them."

Not far away, in a separate camp on the outskirts of Charsadda town, more than 150 people are staying in classrooms in a vocational school building.

Khan Wali, a 29-year-old with one wife and four children, said the military operation could lead to more sympathy for the Taliban.

"Why is the government bombing our homes? The Taliban want to bring peace to the area," he said.

He and others also decried suspected U.S. missile strikes that they said have killed innocent people in compounds allegedly inhabited by Taliban and al-Qaida fighters.

"It is because of these atrocities that people are giving the militants more and more sympathy," said Mohammad Shoaib, a 23-year-old manual laborer.

___

Associated Press Writer Riaz Khan contributed to this report.
http://news.yahoo.com/story/ap/pakistan_the_displaced;_ylt=Av4sFl0O60XUDi2xzB4PWlKaK8MA



I feel taking care of the displaced people with facilities and comfort can go a long way in winning their heart and mind while forces are fighting around their homes or else the condition they are living in at the moment can push them back to taliban camp
 
Last edited:
^This is what I have been saying all this while... the goal of every insurgency is to create an anti-establishment feeling among the masses.

Note these lines:

"In interviews at two camps visited by the AP, virtually no one would criticize the Taliban or openly support the military action.

It was difficult to say why — whether they were scared, sympathetic, or genuinely not bothered by the insurgents, or whether tribal loyalties wouldn't allow them to speak ill of the militants to a foreigner.

Did the Taliban force them to give up male members to fight the jihad? "No."

Did the Taliban threaten the people? "No — they leave us alone, and we leave them alone."

Did the Taliban punish men without beards or women who wandered out alone? "No ... they might encourage people to observe Islamic law, but most of us do so anyway."

And best of all this:

Khan Wali, a 29-year-old with one wife and four children, said the military operation could lead to more sympathy for the Taliban.

"Why is the government bombing our homes? The Taliban want to bring peace to the area," he said.

He and others also decried suspected U.S. missile strikes that they said have killed innocent people in compounds allegedly inhabited by Taliban and al-Qaida fighters.

"It is because of these atrocities that people are giving the militants more and more sympathy," said Mohammad Shoaib, a 23-year-old manual laborer.
 
^This is what I have been saying all this while... the goal of every insurgency is to create an anti-establishment feeling among the masses.

Note these lines:

"In interviews at two camps visited by the AP, virtually no one would criticize the Taliban or openly support the military action.

It was difficult to say why — whether they were scared, sympathetic, or genuinely not bothered by the insurgents, or whether tribal loyalties wouldn't allow them to speak ill of the militants to a foreigner.

Did the Taliban force them to give up male members to fight the jihad? "No."

Did the Taliban threaten the people? "No — they leave us alone, and we leave them alone."

Did the Taliban punish men without beards or women who wandered out alone? "No ... they might encourage people to observe Islamic law, but most of us do so anyway."

And best of all this:

Khan Wali, a 29-year-old with one wife and four children, said the military operation could lead to more sympathy for the Taliban.

"Why is the government bombing our homes? The Taliban want to bring peace to the area," he said.

He and others also decried suspected U.S. missile strikes that they said have killed innocent people in compounds allegedly inhabited by Taliban and al-Qaida fighters.

"It is because of these atrocities that people are giving the militants more and more sympathy," said Mohammad Shoaib, a 23-year-old manual laborer.

How can one expect them to criticize Taliban? These displaced people are living in camps temporarily build for them, not permanent and they see themselves going back to their villages in future. It is a well known fact that fear of gun is always more than the fear of badge. If one has been forcefully made to witness Taliban slaughtering tribesman on accusations of being Pak spy & fully being aware of the fact that they have to return back to their homes in future, it is natural for a person to keep his mouth shut and not to say a word against them.

Moreover, there are reports of foreign elements involved in disturbance which makes situation more flammable. Have peace talks succeeded before? No. So why to do that drama again & again without achieving any goal?

How can one say that Taliban want to bring peace? Is the person saying this is stupid? No. He is actually scared. Taliban want to bring peace at the cost of human lives in Pakistan, that is rightly, not acceptable by GOP.

Recently Taliban has offered peace talks but GOP has refused it saying that unless militants surrender, there can be no peace and operation will continue. Fair enough...

Taliban’s offer to cease fire, hold talks rejected
 
Last edited:
Martial Law:

Last I heard Islam did not advocate letting criminals get away scott free after repressing and murdering people and destroying private and public property. Islam does not allow for the Taliban to find sanctuary in Paksitan after attacking NATO and Afghan troops in Afghanistan.

If the Islam proposed by the Taliban is what the majority of the people want, and is the solution you suggest be adopted, then let there be MAD, for a Pakistan existing under the Islam of the barbarians calling themselves warriors of God is really not one worth anything.

We either prevent such a Pakistan, or be destroyed fighting against it.


I am unaware that Islam [or any other religion] advocates letting criminals get away scott free and I, certainly, do not propose the Talibanization of Pakistan - [as you claim].

Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of Islam and its history would regard your notion of an "Islam of the barbarians" as a complete oxymoron.

The Taliban and Al-Qaeda are not movements that sprang organically from the fertile soil of Islam, but, jihadist outfits that were created to fight the Soviet Union . . .with considerable assistance from the CIA and the House of Al-Saud. Their 'handlers' amongst the Pakistani military and intelligence apparatus has, also, used them as instruments of Pakistani policy in the region.
However, in the fevered atmosphere of the "War On Terror", the Taliban/Al-Qaeda have been cast as convenient 'bogeymen' . . . in complete contrast to their lack of support and relevancy to the averge Pakistani/Afghan. I, also, do not feel that they have, in any way, a credible vision for any part of the Muslim World.

However, Political Islam is the dominant cultural force in the Muslim World today . . . its advocates do have a credible programme for Pakistan and they pose a real challenge to American hegemony. Pakistan is about to undergo a cultural transformation, which, gives the Pakistani people an opportunity to rid themselves of a bankrupt political system and assume autonomy over their affairs . . . Al-Qaeda and the Taliban will have a limited role in this process.
As a supporter of Pakistan and her people, you should welcome the prospect of a productive, accountable and dynamic political system in Islamabad !?
 
This is what I have been saying all this while... the goal of every insurgency is to create an anti-establishment feeling among the masses.

Err.. yes. Which is why everyone here has been pointing out that we need to ensure that the refugees are provided proper facilities and resources, and the operation be finished as soon as possible.

However, given the barbarity of the Taliban, the previous 'peace deals' that allowed the Taliban to continue to do whatever they wanted, and skepticism about the GoP's chances of success, it stands to reason that the people would want to hide opinions.

The people being non-committal is IMO a positive for the GoP - since the people fear the Taliban, and hence fear for their lives.

There are of course those as well who see nothing wrong with the Taliban, such as the man who said they were for peace, but I would argue that they remain in the minority, as shown by an opinion poll posted by Rabzon a few weeks ago.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom