What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.

This is more or less consistent with what I was saying a week ago.

Anything besides the Izyum gap is of little importance on strategic outcome.

Russia keeps sending forces to be slaughtered piecemeal past Izyum is easy to explain:

The alternative to not losing 1 BTG every 2 days is Ukraine retaking the Izyum gap, and pouring into hilly terrain, and endangering Russian control of bridges across Oskil. That patch of serious hilly terrain continues to the Russian border. Fighting in hills will massively negate Russian advantage in armour, and multiply ATGMs' efficiency.

So they are afraid of Ukrainian force which is 50%-40% smaller, and poorer equipped in that part of the front from going after them.

This means their 25-20 BTGs east of Izyum gathered from last reserves, and previously beaten units may be weak to the point that they themselves are now on defensive.
 
Last edited:
There is a difference and one need to learn to filter the non essentials of these statements.

This one is a firm WARNING not Jen Psaki nor Jen Stoltenberg rhetorics.

EU unlike the US faraway is not taking this lightly unlike the tge gregarious and mindless Americans who lived far away as it may ended up with the EU in nuclear flame. Just one push of a button away.

Is NATO prepared to take the road?

Then why not send NATO troops into Ukraine now.

NATO is humiliating Putin already. They don't need to send troops and directly engage him. The only loser in this is the Ukrainian people.

You don't see how embarrassing it is to warn somebody and they ignore your warning and you do nothing but issue more warnings?

And this goes on for two months...
 
Slipping into a war of attrition, the consequences will be dire for the world especially EU in the coming months and even years.

Due to disruption all these are leading to food supplies and energy shortages.

High inflation has hit most EU states and many citizens in these states are slipping into poverty.

Without welfare programs in place which in any case these givernment can't afford, the final loser won't be Russia but the European themselves.

That is why many EU nations suddenly waking up and understand why China, India, etc abstained in the UN.

Their National Security interests which include Food supplies and Energy comes first.

Then why are the Ukrainian Neptune batteries not firing at other Russian warships as well?

These are mere words of war which neither side can proved nor need to prove.

Russia is trying to prove US clandestine role and involvement in the Ukrainian conflict and drawing them directly in.

Sadly, very few will understand, hence, the smart ones abstained or voted against and on the side street watching the car wreck. But there are other motives besides economics as well why the rest of world isn’t giving much attention to Europe crying for support.


Selective reasoning much, lol
 
Last edited:
NATO is humiliating Putin already. They don't need to send troops and directly engage him. The only loser in this is the Ukrainian people.

You don't see how embarrassing it is to warn somebody and they ignore your warning and you do nothing but issue more warnings?

And this goes on for two months...
what can putin do anyway...except nukes he dont have anything...nato will simply send russia to stone age without nukes
 
NATO is humiliating Putin already. They don't need to send troops and directly engage him. The only loser in this is the Ukrainian people.

You don't see how embarrassing it is to warn somebody and they ignore your warning and you do nothing but issue more warnings?

And this goes on for two months...
That will be interesting.

Explain to us how did NATO humiliate Russia? Your explanation is illogical and strangely you agreed the only loser is the Ukrainian themaelves? East or West! You did not clarify.

The US offers new F-16V in exchange for every Soviet era warplanes donated by these ex-Warsaw Pact nations and Poland agreed but will only delivered them to US base in Germany for US to despatch. The US was alarmed and said NO. That is what humiliation is all about.

I am only highlighting the danger and implication of such warning but I guess many will take it lightly until it is too late.

Fools rush in where angel dare not to tread.
 
Last edited:
That will be interesting.

Explain to us how did NATO humiliate Russia? Your explanation is illogical and strangely you agreed the only loser is the Ukrainian themaelves? East or West! You did not clarify.

The US offers new F-16V in exchange for every Soviet era warplanes donated by these ex-Warsaw Pact nations and Poland agreed but will only delivered them to US base in Germany for US to despatch. The US was alarmed and said NO. That is what humiliation is all about.

I am only highlighting the danger and implication of such warning but I guess many will take it lightly until it is too late.

Fools rush in where angel dare not to tread.
The only ones that think Russia is doing well are the Russian people. Even Putin knows how this is going. That’s why he is putting FSB agents in jail and removing generals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmr
The only ones that think Russia is doing well are the Russian people. Even Putin knows how this is going. That’s why he is putting FSB agents in jail and removing generals.
This is a war that is going one direction.
Even the Pentagon admitted it in its statement:

Russia is shaping the war in Ukraine.

Without a political settlement with Russia, IMO and many there is no future for ukraine.

Now that Russia will upgrade the action to hitting decision making centers, will Ukraine leadership be in operation in exile?

No foreign investors will ever dare to step a foot into Ukraine without a peaceful political settlement with Russia and that is a fact and reality easily ignored with all these cheering by partisans.
 
Last edited:
That will be interesting.

Explain to us how did NATO humiliate Russia? Your explanation is illogical and strangely you agreed the only loser is the Ukrainian themaelves? East or West! You did not clarify.

The US offers new F-16V in exchange for every Soviet era warplanes donated by these ex-Warsaw Pact nations and Poland agreed but will only delivered them to US base in Germany for US to despatch. The US was alarmed and said NO. That is what humiliation is all about.

I am only highlighting the danger and implication of such warning but I guess many will take it lightly until it is too late.

Fools rush in where angel dare not to tread.
Chinese military fans are laughing at the USA for not daring to Soviet era warplanes to Ukraine. I don't think USA is a qualified boss8-)8-)
 
No foreign investors will ever dare to step a foot into Ukraine without a peaceful political settlement with Russia and that is a fact and reality easily ignored with all these cheering by partisans.

The the only man that can stop this war is Putin.

And so far he has made no reasonable offer that would bring peace.

Russians negotiations where in bad faith from the beginning.



~
 
Last edited:
Even the most absolute dictator must adhere to public opinion. Putin is the leader of Russia, but to say that he alone was the reason for this war is delusional. The consensus in Russia is that this war is about Russia's survival as a country. Putin is the face of that consensus.
 
That will be interesting.

Explain to us how did NATO humiliate Russia? Your explanation is illogical and strangely you agreed the only loser is the Ukrainian themaelves? East or West! You did not clarify.

The US offers new F-16V in exchange for every Soviet era warplanes donated by these ex-Warsaw Pact nations and Poland agreed but will only delivered them to US base in Germany for US to despatch. The US was alarmed and said NO. That is what humiliation is all about.

I am only highlighting the danger and implication of such warning but I guess many will take it lightly until it is too late.

Fools rush in where angel dare not to tread.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/stra...e-decisive-weapon-in-it.740297/#post-13714007
 
Last edited:

Crew of Russian Cruiser Moskva to Continue Serving in Navy - Defense Ministry

1 hour ago

MOSCOW (Sputnik) - The crew of the sunken Russian guided missile cruiser Moskva will carry on with their service in the country's navy, the Russian Defense Ministry said on Saturday.
On Thursday, the ministry said that the vessel, which had been damaged after ammunition explosion, sunk during stormy weather.

"The commander-in-chief of the navy, Admiral Nikolay Yevmenov, and the Black Sea Fleet command had a meeting with the crew of the guided missile cruiser Moskva in Sevastopol. Admiral Nikolay Yevmenov informed the cruiser's crew that the officers, midshipmen and sailors will continue their service in the navy," the ministry said on Telegram.
Conscript crew members of Moskva will be retired to reserve from may to June in line with law, Yevmenov said in a separate statement on Russian television channel Zvezda.
The ship, whose initial name was "Slava," was laid down in Mykolaiv in 1976 and commissioned in 1983.

https://sputniknews.com/20220416/cr...ng-in-navy---defense-ministry-1094821942.html

Crew of Sunken Moskva Missile Cruiser Re-Enlists To Continue Service In Navy​




https://www.bitchute.com/video/3HvqkTizClGj/
Interesting
Despite hit by 2 missiles they all be alive.
They seem invincible. But where can they go? The Moskwa is destroyed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom